Permalink
-- MY DISCOVERY OF AUSTRALIA AND THE PLATITUDE OF ADVANCE AUSTRALIA
FAIR: TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT CAPTAIN JAMES COOK'S FAKE NEWS OF DISCOVERY?
(c) 2016 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 2 April, 2017
*PLATITUDE*
- a flat, dull, or trite remark, especially one uttered as if it were
fresh or profound.
- the quality or state of being flat, dull, or trite: the platitude of
most political oratory.
- Word of the Day for 2 April, 2017; Courtesy: www.dictiomary.com
Nous:#15
Time:18:15 hrs
Date:1770.12.25
Torah:#40 #2 #5 %81 = #47
Dao:Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of Virtue
Tetra:#1 - Centre
I-Ching:H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning
Latin: Solus {Alone; Eternal God} Alt: Lakbel {Journey in the Circuit of
God} {
1. HELPS IN CONSOLATION AND THOSE WHO WISH TO HAVE CHILDREN
2. MORALS
3. RELIGION & PIETY
4. Seat
} Partial Solar Eclipse 25 December 2000
Eliud {God is my praise}
- http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:7,col:9,nous:15
***@zen: 4, row: 7, col: 9, nous: 15 [Super: #359 / #1 - To Guide
with Names, Reason's Realisation; I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra:
24 - Joy, Ego: #397 / #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of
Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning;
Tetra: 1 - Centre]
YOUTUBE: "AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL ANTHEM - choir, Australian imagery,
lyrics, two verses"
-
@memeBrain [Telos: #35, Super: #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of
Benevolence; I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 -
Following, Ego: #73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46 -
Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent]
Captain Cook says of his 22 August 1770 discovery, "[since I] sic. may
land no more upon this Eastern coast of New Holland, and on the Western
side I can make no new discovery the honour {ie.
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #359 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #35} = #4, #5, #60, #10,
#70, #10, #200 = dexios (G1188): 1) *THE* *RIGHT*, *THE* *RIGHT* *HAND*;
2) *METAPHOR*; 2a) *A* *PLACE* *OF* *HONOUR* *OR* *AUTHORITY*
} of which belongs to the Dutch navigators and as such they may lay
Claim to it as their property." [Journal, 22 August 1770 p 387, n. 4]
The argument on the lack of effectual British sovereignty as a
superseding authority over the discovery of the East coast of New
Holland hangs on the Sovereign motto:
DIEU ET MON DROIT: God is my right had."
YOUTUBE: "Power of Positivity (A bag of nails)" (Published on 10 October
2016)
-
#37 - NON-DEEMING ACTION, GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION; I-CHING: H40 -
DELIVERANCE; TETRA: 21 - RELEASE
"The Dao in its constancy engages in no conscious action,
[COMMENT: It complies with the Natural].
Yet nothing remains undone.
[COMMENT: In either getting its start or achieving its completion, every
one of the myriad things, without exception, stems from what is done in
this way].
If any lord or prince could hold on to it, the myriad folk would undergo
moral transformation spontaneously. Once nurtured, should desire arise,
I would press down on it with the nameless uncarved block.
[COMMENT: In 'once nurtured, should desire arise,' 'arise' means the
formation of desire. 'I would press down on it with the nameless
uncarved block' means that I would not play the master].
With the nameless uncarved block, they too would stay free of desire.
[COMMENT: There would be no desire or contention; The common people,
befuddled by praise and advancement and excited by honor and reward, let
their desires advance and their hearts/minds contend].
Achieving tranquility by keeping them free of desire, all under Heaven
would govern themselves." [Readings from Section #37, The Classic of the
Way and Virtue, Tao Te Ching of Laozi as Interpreted by Wang Bi,
Translation by Richard John Lynn, 1999]
Pity that it didn't work for Captain James {that supplants, undermines;
the heel} Cook and his bag of nails which the sailors in wanton glee
exchanged for sexual favours as prostitution with the Tahitian wives--so
virulent was it, that the previous ship called the Dolphin was virtually
rendered unseaworthy.
Cook lamented to his medical officer that the instance of venereal
disease was so prevalent that there wasn't sufficient medicinal remedy.
Captain James Cook wrote in a journal on 22 August 1770 of his discovery
as the east coast of Australia: "[Since I] may land no more upon this
eastern coast of New Holland, and on the western side I can make no new
discovery the honour of which belongs to the Dutch navigators and as
such they may lay claim to it as their property."
- http://indigitrax.org.au/dutch-shipwrecks/dirck-hartogh.html
In memory of a 400 year history as a Dutch presence at Cape Inscription,
Shark Bay, Western Australia and recorded on a Dirk Hartog pewter dish
which translates as: 'arrived here on 25 October 1616'
YOUTUBE: "The KLF - America What Time is Love?”
- http://youtu.be/9L4OnoEh2us
In history's page, let every stage, advance Australia Fair {of a means
or procedure not violent}: 'that you stole the land at the time of the
Boer War (1899–1902) and Australian Federation into a Commonwealth of 1901.'
The last person to be hung for sodomy in Amsterdam occurred in 1765 and
whilst such criminalised acts occurred upon Dutch ships and were
prosecuted there was thereafter a degree of cultural permissibility, and
the British perverse experience of prostituted married native women was
as a social depravity, entirely unknown.
According to Wikipedia, "That on 14 February 1779, Cook who was regarded
by some Hawaiians as an incarnation of the Polynesian god Lono as the
deity of fertility, agriculture, rainfall, music and peace who descended
to Earth on a rainbow to marry Laka as the goddess of forest growth and
whom the kings of Tahiti and Hawaiʻi claimed as their ancestors, marched
through the Hawaiian village to kidnap and ransom the King of Hawaiʻi,
Kalaniʻōpuʻu. Cook took the King (aliʻi nui) by his own hand and led him
willingly away.
One of Kalaniʻōpuʻu's favorite wives, Kanekapolei and two chiefs
approached the group as they were heading to boats. They pleaded with
the king not to go until he stopped and sat where he stood. An old
Kahuna (priest), chanting rapidly while holding out a coconut, attempted
to distract Cook and his men as a large crowd began to form at the
shore. The king began to understand that Cook was his enemy.
As Cook turned his back to help launch the boats, he was struck on the
head by the villagers and then stabbed to death as he fell on his face
in the surf."
That on 25 October 2016 we the people of Dutch ancestry will celebrate
400 years of a true history when an inscribed pewter plate of their
discovery event and sovereign claim were nailed to a post.
We have a dignity which Australians do not nor cannot possess and have
actively sought to deny us, and neither can such sin the nails of Christ
erase.
Gadzooks ([origin of late 17th century]: alteration of God's hooks, ie.
the nails by which Christ was fastened to the cross).
THE BINDING NORM (ie. NORMA OBLIGANS) under the under the LETTERS PATENT
to FEDERATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF 1901 is not MARRIAGE to be
"OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL.
The motto "DIEU ET MON DROIT" is said to have first been used by Richard
I (1157–1199 CE) as a battle cry (#65 - SOLDIER) and presumed to be a
reference to the divine right of the Monarch to govern.
DIEU ET MON DROIT has been translated in several ways, including 'God
and my right,' 'God and my right hand,' 'God and my lawful right,' and
'God and my right shall me defend.'
So your composite #15 - HYMEN / MARRIAGE; #34 - PHALLUS / SATAN; #65 -
SOLDIERS; #111 - SUNDAY SACREDNESS by CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE AS
INTELLECTUAL TETRAD as CONTEMPTUOUS statement of denial over which you
are quite delusional and so don't be a twat with a loose digit--wipe
your hands (ie. specifically your *ZEIG* *HEIL* fascist right hand)
before you next so impiously touch the keyboard as the instrument of
TREASON.
But that doesn't mitigate the accusation of TREASON under the auspices
of SECTION 9A of the Crimes Act of Victoria (1958) AND FOR WHICH *I*
*WILL* *NOT* *BE* *SATISFIED* *WITH* *ANYTHING* *ELSE* *THAN* *THE*
*DEATH* *PENALTY* (ie.
*THE* *MACCA* *MACKENZIE* *PISS* *POT*, *STONE* *CASTLE* *AND* *JAKE*
*KOVCO* *AS* *LADY* *BOY* *FASCIST* *FAN* *CLUB* *MEMORIAL*
) *SO* *THAT* *A* *PROPER* *SOLEMNITY* *IS* *RESTORED* {EGO (FEMALE)
IDEA: #414 = #4, #70, #20, #5, #10, #300, #5 = dokeo (G1380): 1) to be
of opinion, think, suppose; 2) *TO* *SEEM*, *TO* *BE* *ACCOUNTED*,
*REPUTED* {IE. *THE* *STATE* *OF* *BEING* *HIGHLY* *REGARDED*; *FAME*};
3) it seems to me; 3a) I think, judge: thus in question; 3b) it seems
good to, pleased me, I determined; glory (as very apparent), in a wide
application (literally or figuratively, objectively or
subjectively):—dignity, glorious), honour, praise, worship}.
The intention of '*ZEIG* *HEIL*' is to show a complete stupidity with
German culture as to being entirely unacquainted with its political
constructs such as fascism that is readily known by its mantra as
'*SIEG* *HEIL*' (ie. victory hail). Which is evidently so familiar to
your own nature, that you immediately resort to a triumphant-ism and
superiority over the mere excitement which the recital of the term
brings to you.
Because it's an artful bastardization of a phrase, it cannot then be
construed as offensive language even though it sounds similar to the
usual form of the expression with which you are so familiar.
The intention is to mock, in the sense of the phrase: '*ZEIG* *MAL*
*HER*' (ie. let me see it) or the idiom: '*ZEIG* (*MAL* *ETWAS*)
*RÜCKGRAT*!' (ie. Grow a pair [of balls]!) and therefore the phrase
which I intend is (if my German is correct): '*ZEIG* *HEIL*' (ie. show
me salvation) as in the sense '*HEILIG*' which means 'holy'."
NARCISSUS AND PERENNIALISM: The Ancient Greek myth of Narcissus tells of
a young *HUNTER* so enchantingly beautiful that he became inflated with
hubris and rebuffed the advances of anyone who fell in love with him
because no one could possibly be good enough for his exceptional opinion
of himself. The goddess of revenge, Nemesis, decided to teach Narcissus
a lesson, so she lured him to a *POOL* of water. There Narcissus saw his
own reflection and immediately fell hopelessly in love with it,
eventually ending his own life because he could not have the only thing
he ever met that was good enough to receive his love:
A REFLECTION OF HIMSELF.
I wonder if lessons from this myth may pertain to perennialism. In light
of Narcissus, let's explore the above-stated problems with perennialism
starting with the blatant anthropocentrism and individualism of
enlightenment. Anthropocentrism means "regarding humankind as the
central or most important element of existence" (The New Oxford American
Dictionary), and individualism suggests that the interests of the
individual should take precedence over the needs of the larger community
(Individualism). The common denominator of anthropocentrism and
individualism is an exaggerated sense of self-importance. In
perennialism this sense of self-importance rises all the way to the
belief that "I am God." In the ancient Indian philosophies of Vedanta,
Samkhya, and Yoga that gave rise to perennialism, this is stated as tat
tvam asi, or "thou art that." It would be hard to conceive of a more
grandiose belief than that our individual human mind can evolve 'all the
way up the hierarchy to Spirit itself' (Wilber in Walsh and Vaughan,
Paths Beyond Ego, p. 215). The anthropocentrism and individualism of
enlightenment therefore connect directly with the exaggerated sense of
self portrayed by the myth of Narcissus.
FOR FURTHER CONCEPTS OF SELF INFATUATION SEE ALSO: FRANK VISSER'S
INTEGRAL WORLD NEWSLETTER NO: 648 (Amsterdam, 17 March 2017) WHICH
CONVEYS AN ESSAY BY GARY STOGSDILL, TITLED: "PERENNIALISM AND THE MYTH
OF NARCISSUS - Falling in Love with Mind"
- http://www.integralworld.net/stogsdill2.html
To be #41 or not to be #81 that is the question?
I will not make any clever interventions [of petitions] for you as I
have done for others.
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #359 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #35} has 16 Categories: #6,
#1, #300, #2, #50 = 'Eshban (H790): 1) an chief of Edom; #6, #3, #300,
#50 = Goshen (H1657): 1) a region in northern Egypt, east of the lower
Nile, where the children of Israel lived from the time of Joseph to the
time of Moses; 2) a district in southern Palestine between Gaza and
Gibeon; 3) a town in the mountains of Judah probably in the district of
Goshen; #6, #50, #8, #200, #90, #5 = charats (H2782): 1) *TO* *CUT*,
*SHARPEN*, *DECIDE*, *DECREE*, *DETERMINE*, *MAIM*, *MOVE*, *BE*
*DECISIVE*, *BE* *MUTILATED*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO* *CUT*, *MUTILATE*;
1a2) *TO* *SHARPEN*; 1A3) *TO* *DECIDE*; 1b) (Niphal) *TO* *BE*
DECISIVE*; #6, #5, #30, #2, #10, #300, #6 = lebash (Aramaic) (H3848): 1)
to be clothed; 1a) (P'al) to be clothed; 1b) (Aphel) to clothe someone;
#50, #8, #300, #1 = nechash (Aramaic) (H5174): 1) *COPPER*, *BRONZE*;
#6, #80, #3, #200, #10, #20, #40 = peger (H6297): 1) *CORPSE*,
*CARCASS*, *MONUMENT*, *STELA*; 1A) *CORPSE* (*OF* (*MAN*); 1B)
*CARCASS* (*OF* *ANIMALS*); #300, #6, #3, #10, #40 = shagah (H7686): 1)
*TO* *GO* *ASTRAY*, *STRAY*, *ERR*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO* *ERR*, *STRAY*;
1a2) *TO* *SWERVE*, *MEANDER*, *REEL*, *ROLL*, *BE* *INTOXICATED*, *ERR*
(*IN* *DRUNKENNESS*); 1a3) *TO* *GO* *ASTRAY* (*MORALLY*); 1a4) *TO*
*COMMIT* *SIN* *OF* *IGNORANCE* *OR* *INADVERTENCE*, *ERR*
(*IGNORANTLY*); 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) *TO* *LEAD* *ASTRAY*; 1b2) *TO*
*LEAD* *ASTRAY*, *MISLEAD* (*MENTALLY*); 1b3) *TO* *LEAD* *ASTRAY*
(*MORALLY*); #5, #300, #4, #10, #40 = Siddiym (H7708): 1) valley where
the Dead Sea is located; #50, #300, #6, #3 = suwg (H7734): 1) to move,
go, turn back, turn away; 1a) (Niphal) to turn oneself away; #300, #9,
#10, #40 = sh*ttah (H7848): 1) acacia tree, acacia wood; #5, #300, #40,
#9, #5 = shemittah (H8059): 1) *LETTING* *DROP* *OF* *EXACTIONS,
(*TEMPORARY*) *REMITTING*, *RELEASE* (*FROM* *DEBT*); #2, #70, #8, #9,
#70, #200 = boethos (G998): 1) a helper; #4, #5, #60, #10, #70, #10,
#200 = dexios (G1188): 1) *THE* *RIGHT*, *THE* *RIGHT* *HAND*; 2)
*METAPHOR*; 2a) *A* *PLACE* *OF* *HONOUR* *OR* *AUTHORITY*; #20, #5,
#50, #70, #4, #70, #60, #70, #10 = kenodoxos (G2755): 1) *GLORYING*
*WITHOUT* *REASON*, *CONCEITED*, *VAIN* *GLORIOUS*, *EAGER* *FOR*
*EMPTY* *GLORY*; #70, #20, #50, #8, #200, #1, #10 = okneo (G3635): 1) to
feel loath, to be slow; 2) to delay, hesitate; #5, #200, #8, #40, #1,
#50, #5, #50 = semaino (G4591): 1) *TO* *GIVE* *A* *SIGN*, *TO*
*SIGNIFY*, *INDICATE*; 2) *TO* *MAKE* *KNOWN*;
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #397 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #73} has 13 Categories:
#50, #1, #300, #40, #6 = 'asham (H816): 1) *TO* *OFFEND*, *BE *GUILTY*,
*TRESPASS*; 2) (TWOT) *TO* *BE* *DESOLATE*, *ACKNOWLEDGE* *OFFENSE*; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) *TO* *DO* *WRONG*, *OFFEND*, *TRESPASS*, *COMMIT* *AN*
*OFFENSE*, *DO* *INJURY*; 1a2) *TO* *BE* *OR* *BECOME* *GUILTY*; 1A3)
*TO* *BE* *HELD* *GUILTY*; 1A4) *TO* *BE* *INCRIMINATED*; 1b) (Niphal)
*TO* *SUFFER* *PUNISHMENT*; 1c) (Hiphil) *TO* *DECLARE* *GUILTY*; #6,
#1, #300, #40, #10, #40 = 'ashem (H818): 1) *GUILTY*, *FAULTY* (*AND*
*OBLIGED* *TO* *OFFER* *A* *GUILT*-*OFFERING*); #6, #10, #300, #10, #40,
#1, #30 = Yesiyma'el (H3450): 1) a Simeonite chief of the family of
Shimei; #6, #30, #300, #50, #10, #1 = lishshan (Aramaic) (H3961): 1)
*TONGUE*, *LANGUAGE*; 1a) *TONGUE*, *LANGUAGE*; 1b) *PEOPLE*
(*FIGURATIVE*); #5, #40, #100, #2, #200, #10, #40 = qabar (H6912): 1) to
bury; 1a) (Qal) to bury; 1b) (Niphal) to be buried; 1c) (Piel) to bury,
bury (in masses); 1d) (Pual) to be buried; #40, #100, #2, #200, #10, #5,
#40 = qeber (H6913): 1) grave, sepulchre, tomb; #30, #300, #2, #50, #10,
#5 = Shebanyah (H7645): 1) a Levite who sealed the covenant with
Nehemiah; 2) a priest who sealed the covenant with Nehemiah; 3) a 2nd
Levite who sealed the covenant with Nehemiah; 4) a priest appointed by
David to blow with the trumpets before the ark of God; #5, #300, #2, #90
= shabats (H7661): 1) *CRAMP*, *AGONY*, *ANGUISH*; 1a) *MEANING*
*DUBIOUS*; #1, #30, #30, #70, #3, #5, #50, #8, #200 = allogenes (G241):
1) *SPRUNG* *FROM* *ANOTHER* *RACE*, *A* *FOREIGNER*, *ALIEN*; #1, #80,
#70, #4, #5, #4, #5, #10, #3, #40, #5, #50, #70, #50 = apodeiknumi
(G584): 1) *TO* *POINT* *AWAY* *FROM* *ONE'S* *SELF*, *TO* *POINT*
*OUT*, *SHOW* *FORTH*, *TO* *EXPOSE* *TO* *VIEW*, *EXHIBIT*; 2) *TO*
*DECLARE*, *TO* *SHOW, *TO* *PROVE* *WHAT* *KIND* *OF* *PERSON* *ANYONE*
*IS*, *TO* *PROVE* *BY* *ARGUMENTS*, *DEMONSTRATE*; #5, #30, #1, #40,
#10, #300, #1, #10 = Elamites (G1639): 1) an Elamite, ie. an inhabitant
of the province of Elymais, a region stretching southwards to the
Persian Gulf, but boundaries of which are variously given; #5, #40, #80,
#1, #10, #60, #1, #200 = empaizo (G1702): 1) *TO* *PLAY* *WITH*,
*TRIFLE* *WITH*; 1a) *TO* *MOCK*; 1b) *TO* *DELUDE*, *DECEIVE*; #80,
#30, #8, #9, #70, #200 = plethos (G4128): 1) *A* *MULTITUDE*; 1a) *A*
*GREAT* *NUMBER*, *OF* *MEN* *OR* *THINGS*; 1b) *THE* *WHOLE* *NUMBER*,
*THE* *WHOLE* *MULTITUDE*, *THE* *ASSEMBLAGE*; 1B1) *THE* *MULTITUDE*
*OF* *THE* *PEOPLE*;
PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES TO THE LAWS OF NATURE
Three somewhat diferent approaches to the “laws of nature" have been set
out in recent studies exploring the more philosophical aspects of the
matter. In the first place, there is continued support for the Humean
approach, which discerns regularity in the ordering process of the human
mind, rather than any independently-existing natural ordering (Urbach
1988). For such writers, “laws of nature” merely record actual or de
facto regularities. Since there is no necessity in nature, the “laws”
in question can only describe what is observed, and nothing more
Observation may thus be regarded as a process which aims to impose order
on the extra-mental world. This kind of approach can be found in the
writings of Ernst Mach (Mach 1898):
"The communication of scientific knowledge always involves description,
that is, mimetic {ie.
Nous:#73
Time:19:55 hrs
Date:2017.1.19
Torah:#40 #90 #200 %81 = #6
Dao:Employing Deeming, Daring to Act
Tetra:#7 - Ascent
I-Ching:H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending
Latin: Gloria {God who comforts the oppressed} Alt: Menkel {Cease Strife
Before God] {
1. HELPS HEAL THE ILLS OF THE SPIRIT, RELEASES FROM PERSECUTORS
2. MEN OF VIRTUE
3. FAITHFULNESS, INDUCES OBEDIENCE IN SUBORDINATES
4. hom*oth
}
ASSOCIATED TO THE 4TH JURISPRUDENT/CHRONOLOGICAL (Hebrew Kabbalah Magic
Square) PLANE AS {Nature amended in its Nature}
With Ascent (#7 as {#3, #20, #52, #73 *** , #79, #1, #16, #35, #7}),
high ambitions.
With Sinking (#64 as {#21, #9, #25, #76, #47, #76, #49, #69, #64}), low
ambitions.
Jesus {He is saved/A savior; a deliverer} of Nazareth {Sovereign; one
chosen or set apart; separated; crowned; sanctified};
#15 CE
***@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 6, nous: 73 [Super: #373 / #71 - Know-How
as a Disease, Disease of Knowledge; I-Ching: H38 - Contrariety,
Opposition, Polarising, Perversion; Tetra: 6 - Contrariety, Ego: #325 /
#73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46 - Climbing,
Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #373 HAS 10 CATEGORIES:
#80, #1, #100, #8, #3, #70, #100, #10, #1 = paregoria (G3931): 1)
addressing, address; 1a) exhortation; 1b) comfort, solace, relief,
alleviation, consolation;
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #325 HAS 21 CATEGORIES:
#30, #5, #20, #10, #200, #50, #10 = nakar (H5234): 1) to recognise,
acknowledge, know, respect, discern, regard; 2) to act or treat as
foreign or strange, disguise, misconstrue; 1a) (Niphal) to be
recognised; 1b) (Piel) to regard; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to regard, observe,
pay attention to, pay regard to, notice; 1c2) to recognise (as formerly
known), perceive; 1c3) to be willing to recognise or acknowledge,
acknowledge with honour; 1c4) to be acquainted with; 1c5) to
distinguish, understand; 1d) (Hithpael) to make oneself known; 2a)
(Niphal) to disguise oneself; 2b) (Piel); 2b1) to treat as foreign
(profane); 2b2) to misconstrue; 2c) (Hithpael); 2c1) to act as alien;
2c2) to disguise oneself;
#5, #50, #70, #200 = heis (G1520): 1) *one*;
#40, #10, #40, #5, #10, #200, #9, #1, #10 = mimeomai (G3401): 1) to
imitate: any one;
#70, #10, #70, #40, #5, #50, #70, #10 = oiomai (G3633): 1) *to*
*suppose*, *think*;
ASSOCIATED TO THE 4TH #369 as JURISPRUDENT/CHRONOLOGICAL (Hebrew
Kabbalah Magic Square) PLANE AS (Nature amended in its Nature)
} reproduction of facts in thought, the object of which is to replace
and save the trouble of new experience. Again, to save the labour of
instruction and acquisition, concise abridged description is sought.
This is really all that natural laws are."
For Mach, the “laws of nature" arc thus nothing more than “concise
abridged descriptions” of reality, a convenient and helpful manner of
depicting reality which has no ontological significance. They are purely
heuristic in character, and cannot be held to correspond to anything
that exists independent of the mind of the observer.
Other writers adopt a viewpoint which is more sympathetic to a realist
interpretation. David Lewis may be regarded as developing some insights
John Stuart Mill, who argued that the question about “laws of nature”
may be reduced to the simpler question: “What are the fewest and
simplest assumptions, which being granted, the whole existing order of
nature would result?" (Mill 1974, vol. 7, 317). Lewis suggests that “a
contingent generalization is a law of nature if and only if it appears
as a theorem or (axiom) in each of the true deductive systems that
achieves a best combination of simplicity and strength" (Lewis 1973,
73). A “law of nature” is thus understood to be a contingent
generalization which possesses an appropriate balance of “simplicity"
and “strength", which can be formulated in a propositional manner
allowing it to function within a deductive system. As Lewis himself
later acknowledged, this seems to introduce a significant degree of
subjectivity into the definition of such a law, in that the “best
combination of simplicity and strength” is left to the judgment of the
observer. The distinction between what is a genuine law of nature and
what is simply an accidental regularity thus remains unclear.
A third approach argues that the laws of nature are to be thought of as
relations between universals (Dretske 1977; Tooley l977; Armstrong
1983). These laws of nature arc assumed to exist independently of the
human minds which attempt to discern them. Armstrong draws a fundamental
distinction between “laws of nature" and “law-statements” (Armstrong
1983, 8). A law of nature is thus a feature of the real world; a
law-statement is a human creation which attempts to express these
features. Regularities reflect the way in which certain universals stand
in a relation of “nomic necessitation” (Lange 1992, 154-5). For
Armstrong, a statement p (a “law-statement") affirms a cosmic uniformity
(“a law of nature") if (i) p is universally quantified; (ii) p is true;
(iii) p is contingent; and (iv) p contains only non-local empirical
predicates (apart from logical connectives and quantifiers) (Armstrong
I983, 12). This allows Armstrong to affirm fundamental ordering in
nature, while maintaining the provisionality of human attempts to
express and articulate such regularities.
It is beyond the scope of this work to enter into this debate, although
we shall be considering the merits of a realist approach in due course.
The Humean suggestion that “laws of nature” are imposed on nature is
widely regarded as implausible within the scientific community.
Regularity, according to this viewpoint, is not to be seen as a feature
of the “real World,” but as a construct of an order-imposing human mind.
It is widely-held within the scientific community that regularity
(including statistical regularity) is an intrinsic feature of the world,
uncovered (not imposed) by human investigation. For example, consider
the comments of Paul Davies, which would be widely endorsed by natural
scientists (Davies l992, 8Z—3):
It is important to understand that the regularities of nature are real .
. . I believe any suggestion that the laws of nature are similar
projections of the human mind is absurd. The existence of regularities
in nature is an objective mathematical fact. On the other hand, the
statements called laws that are found in textbooks clearly are human
inventions, but inventions designed to reflect, albeit imperfectly,
actually existing properties of nature. Without this assumption that
regularities are real, science is reduced to an absurdity. Another
reason why I don’t I think the laws of nature are simply made up by us
is that they help us to uncover new things about the world, sometimes
things we never suspected. The mark of a powerful law is that it goes
beyond a faithful description of the original phenomenon it was invoked
to explain, and links up with other phenomena too . . . The history of
science shows that, once a new law is accepted, its consequences are
rapidly worked out, and the law is tested in many novel contexts, often
leading to the discovery of new, unexpected and important phenomena.
This leads me to believe that in conducting science we are uncovering
real regularities and linkages out of nature, not writing them into nature.
It will be clear that a religious (and especially a Christian) approach
to the debate will focus on the idea of the ordering of the world as
something which exists in that world, independent of whether the human
mind recognizes it or not, and that this ordering can be understood to
be related to the doctrine of creation. While many natural scientists
have discarded the original theological framework which led their
predecessors of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries to speak of
“laws of nature,” there is no reason why such an insight should not be
re-appropriated by those natural scientists sensitive to the religious
aspects of their work.
Recent studies of the “laws of nature” have stressed their role in
reflecting ,and conceptualizing order (Harre 1993; Carroll 1994). This
"ordering” can be discerned at several levels, including the general
principles which appear to govern the universe and the classification
systems or “taxonomies” which play such an important role in laying the
foundations for the exploration of the laws of nature (Harte 1993,
10-11). In view of the importance of such taxonomies, we shall explore
their role in the thought of a leading botanist, noting especially the
theological aspects of the matter.
IT WOULD SEEM TO ME THAT WHEN THE BIBLE AND JESUS SAYS:
"*GOD* *IS* *NOT* *THE* *GOD* *OF* *THE* *DEAD*"
IT MEANS THE BINARY (GENDER AND SPERMATIC) HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER AS
TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE ASSOCIATED WITH HETEROSEXUAL MARRIAGE THAT IS
THE WICKED RELIGIOUS/GOVERNMENTAL USE OF THE META-DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES
WHICH ARE DEPICTED WITHIN THE EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD:
"And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar
spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a
people seek unto their God? For the living to the dead? To the law and
to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is
because there is no light in them.
And they shall pass through it, hardly bestead and hungry: and it shall
come to pass, that when they shall be hungry, they shall fret
themselves, and curse their king and their God, and look upward. And
they shall look unto the earth; and behold trouble and darkness, dimness
of anguish; and they shall be driven to darkness." [Isaiah 8:19-22 (KJV)]
AND THE #15 - FACTS {ie. ARE THAT THE MARRIAGE/SOVEREIGN DYNAMIC WHICH
IS DEPENDENT UPON THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER IS ONLY A
METHODOLOGY, WHEREAS THE hom*oIOS THEORY OF NUMBER PROPERLY CONSTITUTES A
PARADIGM} ON #111 - SUNDAY SACREDNESS, #65 - REPENTANCE {#666 - NERO /
SAME SEX MARRIAGE} AS THEIR JEWISH, ROMAN CATHOLIC ET AL CHRISTIAN AND
ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS PIETY {ie. BELIEF, DIS-BELIEF OR NON-BELIEF} BEING
DIABOLICAL #34 - CHRIST-MURDERS.
"*BUT* *THE* *GOD* *OF* *THE* *LIVING*: *YE* *THEREFORE* *DO* *GREATLY*
*ERR*" [Mark 12:12 (KJV)]
Is that this relates to the cosmological / chronological ternary
perspective of number as the Tetragrammaton 3-6-9 bifurcated reality
which was aligned to the custom of prayer times (ie. as #3 - *TERCE*
(ie. @ 0900 hours / when the Psalms 83, 84, and 85 were read), #6 -
*SEXT* (ie. 1200 hours), and #9 - *NONE* (ie. 1500 hours)) as concluding
with the ritual TETRAD (ie. 1800 hours) observed within the Acs of
Apostles Chapter 10 story of Cornelius as Roman *CENTURION* {ie.
According to this SCIENCE as the Pythagorean Theorem: c² = a² + b²
whereby: 5x5 = 25 / #65 as magic sum, #2 as line redacted sum, #1 as
esoteric redacted sum, is assigned to the {*SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars as
the planet of war}
#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury,
#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus,
#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars,
#34 - Lion (Leo): Jupiter,
#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar,
#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol Invictus, and
#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn.
And is thusly given the total Esoteric Number value of #325 as being the
CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING which is within the providence of the
Greco-Roman magic square then associated to Nous: #36 - Natural
Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance,
Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young shoot, Discovering; Tetra:
12 - Youthfulness.
} of what was then called the Italian regiment. [Acts 10:1-48 (KJV)]
And this sacred 'Sabbath' centric religious peaceful dynamic was in
clear deference to the Mithraic character of the state religion by an
anal sad*stic and psychological maleficent as a well-spring {ie. #0 ...
#15 (9) ISIS / SATURN / HYMEN = *HETEROS* MARRIAGE/SOVEREIGN DYNAMIC ...
#34 (16) - JUPITER / OSIRIS / PHALLUS = *SATAN* ... #65 (25) MARS /
HORUS / *SOLDIER* = NERO (#666 v's Same Sex Marriage) ... #111 (36 -
Sunday Sacredness and the total esoteric sum of #666)} being expressly
defined by the five Julio-Claudian Dynasty (27 BCE to 68 CE) era Roman
Caesars as the cause for insatiable conquest desire for Empire which was
advanced in accord with the Pythagorean METHODOLOGY:
MIND (DING-DONG): {#1 + #2 = #3} +
SCIENCE (POOH-POOH): {#3 + #4 = #7} +
OPINION (BOW-WOW): {#5 + #6 = #11} +
SENSE (TA-TA): {#7 + #8 = #15 - *EMBLEM* *OF* *THE* *FLAG*, *POLICE*
*AND* *EMERGENCY* *SERVICES* *SYMBOL*} = #36 (ie. H27 - Realm of its
Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law + H9 - System's Cosmology as
Earth - Formula of Humanity)
As a sophistic opinion perpetuating a HETEROS MARRIAGE ethic through a
mechanical and merciless CANON OF TRANSPOSITION by a pantomimed
contrivance of reality as a faux superiority in a claim of wisdom
comprising the eight elements as only a logical fallacy encapsulation
made of a hybridisation to the DAOist PARADIGM perspective which had
it's Grand Inception at midnight on the new moon of solstice as 21
December 103 BCE to this present day, as the hom*o[IOS] SAPIEN[T] natural
and harmonious equivalent to the COURSE-trochos of NATURE-genesis.
[James 3:6]
Which occurred within King Herod's temple at Jerusalem until it was
raised by Roman military incursion to quell a Jewish revolt within 69
CE, when Vespasian {born in the evening; resembling a wasp} laid siege
to Jerusalem {vision of peace} as the Emperor of Rome and who was the
founder of the Flavian dynasty which consolidated Roman rule in Germany
and Britain and reformed the army and brought prosperity to the empire;
the city of Jerusalem was then captured the following year by his son
Titus {pleasing}.
As encapsulated knowledge, it concerns a perspective of the
SOVEREIGN/MARRIAGE and the supposed peace dynamic as the microcosm being
expressed by a Natural / Common law syllogism and an egalitarian
SOVEREIGN AUTONOMOUS RIGHT aligned to time and associated with a
rational conception of PI (3W1D as ipso facto: 7 x 24 x 13 x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2423 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / New Moon Thursday 21 March 1996) as then distinctly, a
different septet macrocosm perspective of the decalogue as a
circ*mscribing of consciousness being fundamental to existence
articulated by the hom*oIOS THEORY OF NUMBER.
Excerpts from the T'AI HSUAN CHING (CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY) as
commentary on Tetragram #16 - CONTACT as meta-descriptor (outside time)
prototypes as published within 4 BCE, it specifically states '*THE*
*WISE* *PERSON* (ie. hom*o[IOS] SAPIEN[T]) *AVOIDS* *CONTACT* *WITH*
*LESSER*, *BESTIAL* (ie. HETEROS: #15 (9) - SATURN ... #34 (16) -
JUPITER ... #65 (25) - MARS as MALEFICIENT IN BEING FASCIST AS IDEA
SOURCE FOR THE *SWASTIKA*) *MEN*, *LEST* *HE* *BE* *INFLUENCED *FOR*
*THE* *WORSE*':
MALEFICENT (adjective)
- literary causing harm or destruction, especially by supernatural means.
- Astrology relating to the planets Saturn and Mars, traditionally
considered to have an unfavourable influence.
MALFEANCE (noun)
- (LAW) the performance by a public official of an act that is legally
unjustified, harmful, or contrary to law; wrongdoing used especially of
an act in violation of a public trust; Word of the Day for 1 March 2017;
www.dictionary.com
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indcXA0OWJZWnBhc1k
It acquires this distinct FASCIST MALEFICENT intention as a Categorical
Imperative (ie. the TETRAD is always intellectual) by applying the
Pythagorean Method of Reduction to each total sum as the progression of
magic squares.
Thus [1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9]:
#15 gives line sum reduction to 6 with esoteric number #45 and reduces to 9
#34 gives line sum reduction to 7 with esoteric number #136 and reduces to 1
#65 gives line sum reduction to 2 with esoteric number #325 and reduces to 1
#111 gives line sum reduction to 3 with esoteric number #666 and reduces
to 9
On the question of nomenclature the discussion the #41 - #CENTRE (ie. as
is referenced within the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY 4 BCE discussion of
the DAOist (206 BCE - 220 CE) calendar as an Oriental school of
perennials thought as basis to CHINESE Empire Governance) as proposition
which is advanced by Richard (can I call you Dick?) HEATHFIELD is that
"the *AD* nomenclature does not, as some people mistakenly think, number
the years since Jesus's death and resurrection" @ 2102 HOURS (AEST) ON
22 MARCH 2017 and prior to the terrorist EVENT @ 0410 HOURS (AEST) on 22
March 2017 of Westminster, London.
THE ROMAN CATHOLIC HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER AS BINOMIAL (bifurcated
gender and spermatic attributes) NOMENCLATURE IS THEN:
The Roman Catholic nomenclature conforms ONLY to the Pythagorean
scientific formula: c² (25 as #65 - MARS) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN) + b²
(16 as #34 - JUPITER); Binominal nomenclature or binary nomenclature
which is beholden Forma Corporis which is dependent upon its TETRAD (36
as #111 - SOL INVICTUS) as its Intellectual Proposition:
MIND (BOW-WOW): {#1 + #2 = #3} +
SCIENCE (POOH-POOH): {#3 + #4 = #7} +
OPINION (DING-DONG): {#5 + #6 = #11} +
SENSE (TA-TA): {#7 + #8 = #15} = #36 (ie. H27 - Realm of its Nature as
Heaven - Formula of Universal Law + H9 - System's Cosmology as Earth -
Formula of Humanity)
'I *swear* by him who the TETRAKTYS (#10) found,
Whence all our wisdom springs and which contains
Perennial Nature's fountain, cause and root.'
THUS THE PYTHAGOREAN TETRAD is an intellectual conception of the HEAVEN
(#27) + EARTH (#9) = MAN (#36) dynamic which equates to total esoteric
sum equals #666 and which is an encapsulation of Roman Catholic
Religious Belief as a guarded reliance of it being expressed by this
historical ANCHORAGE the sophistry of the Pythagorean TETRAD:
#0 CE ...
@1 = #15 CE (9) - SATURN (ISIS/MARY/HYMEN) ...
@2 = #34 CE (16) - JUPITER (OSIRIS/SATAN/PHALLUS) ...
@3 = #65 CE (25) - MARS (HORUS/SOLDIER) ...
@4 = #111 CE (36) - SOL INVICTUS (Julian 365.25 of Roman Empire
Governance v's 364.5 Chinese DAOist Nature Year or Jewish Temple 364
day/year; {ie.
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #301 = #6, #40, #40, #7, #200, #8 = mizrach (H4217):
1) *PLACE* *OF* *SUNRISE*, *EAST*; 1a) *SUNRISE*, *EAST* (*WITH*
'*SUN*’); 1b) *THE* *EAST* (*WITHOUT* '*SUN*’); 1b1) *TO* *OR* *TOWARD*
*THE* *PLACE* *OF* *SUNRISE*; 1b2) *TO* *THE* *EAST*, *EASTWARD*}
This PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS (ie. gender and spermatic bifurcated
attribution) convention associated with the notional son of HEAVEN-EARTH
dynamic as the forma corporis of MAN as the State and Empire Governance
being worship associated with the *SUN* / #111 as #36 - Sol Invictus as
the 365.25 days conveyed by the Julian Calendar.
1) In that by 1582 CE, the Julian Calendar had already lost 11 days and
so no longer had a HEALTHY (ie. in a good physical or mental condition;
in good health; (of a part of the body) not diseased; normal, natural,
and desirable; indicating or promoting good health) CONGRUITY AND
WHOLESOME (ie. conducive to or characterized by moral well-being)
RELEVANCE with any regime of Roman Empire governance associated to
attributed time.
2) The Gregorian calendar, also called the Western calendar and the
Christian calendar, is internationally the most widely used civil calendar.
It is named after Pope Gregory XIII, who introduced it in October 1582.
3) Most Western European countries changed the start of the year to 1
January before they adopted the Gregorian calendar. For example,
Scotland changed the start of the Scottish New Year to 1 January in 1600
(this means that 1599 was a short year).
4) Whereas the British Empire only adopted these reforms by Act of
Parliament in 1751 and thereby made an effectual "Jesus in the
Wilderness" denial of Satan's regime [#15CE ... #34CE ... #64CE ...
#2000CE] of Roman Empire Governance.
England, Ireland and the British colonies changed the start of the year
to 1 January in 1752 (so 1751 was a short year with only 282 days)
though in England the start of the tax year remained at 25 March (O.S.),
5 April (N.S.) till 1800, when it moved to 6 April. Later in 1752 in
September the Gregorian calendar was introduced throughout Britain and
the British colonies. These two reforms were implemented by the Calendar
(New Style) Act 1750.
5) In 1664, England took over the Dutch colony of New Netherland
(including the New Amsterdam settlement) which England renamed the
Province of New York. With New Netherland, the English also came to
control the former New Sweden (in what is now Delaware), which the Dutch
had conquered earlier. This later became part of Pennsylvania after that
was established in 1680.
Thirteen of Great Britain's colonies rebelled in the American
Revolutionary War, beginning in 1775, primarily over representation,
local laws and tax issues, and established the United States of America,
which was recognised internationally with the signing of the Treaty of
Paris on 3 September 1783.
6) Captain Cook's first voyage (1768–71) reached the south-eastern coast
of Australia on 19 April 1770, and in doing so his expedition became the
first recorded Europeans to have encountered its eastern coastline.
What was it that Captain Cook came to call his 'trusty friend' and
'never-failing guide', which accompanied him on his second and third
voyages?
The Longitude Act of 1714 offered life changing rewards for anyone who
could achieve measurement of east-west position at sea.
The answer is the first marine timekeeper known as 'K1', which was a
copy of a sea-watch built by groundbreaking horologist John Harrison
whose timepieces from the mid 1700s allowed accurate time keeping at sea
enabling the measurement of longitude.
Cook's second voyage (1772–75) marked a successful employment of Larcum
Kendall's K1 copy of John Harrison's H4 marine chronometer, which
enabled Cook to calculate his longitudinal position with much greater
accuracy. Cook's log was full of praise for this time-piece which he
used to make charts of the southern Pacific Ocean that were so
remarkably accurate that copies of them were still in use in the
mid-20th century.
"The timepiece that helped Captain Cook get a quick fix and put
Australia on the map." [The Sydney Morning Herald, 1 May 2016, Tim
Barlass, Senior writer]
-
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/the-timepiece-that-helped-captain-cook-get-a-quick-fix-and-put-australia-on-the-map-20160427-gogacn.html
VENUS / SOL INVICTUS CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING:
Nous:#38
Time:21:15 hrs
Date:2017.2.8
Torah:#40 #8 #10 %81 = #58
Dao:Consequences for Virtuous Discourse
Tetra:#11 - Divergence
I-Ching:H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing
Latin: Propulsator {God who vivifies all things} Alt: Yeyazel {God
Causes a Start} {
1. PROTECTS AGAINST RABIES & FIERCE ANIMALS
2. THE LEARNED, ORATORS & AUTHORS
3. PRESS, BOOKS ETC
4. Astiro
}
#175 CE
VENUS [7X7 = #49 / #175 / #1225 / PYTHAGOREAN SUM OF LINE REDUCTION #4 -
{ie. Formula of Progression of individual phenomena: + *1* - *MONAD*,
*2* - *DUAD*, *3* - *TRIAD* = #6}
***@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 2, nous: 38 [Super: #275 / #65 -
Unlearned Virtuosity as Simplicity; I-Ching: H20 - Viewing,
Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 63 - Watch, Ego: #333 / #38 -
Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority,
Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of the small, Small
surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #275 {#81, #81, #81, #32} has 10 Categories: #6, #30,
#2, #200, #7, #30 = barzel (H1270): 1) iron; 2) tool of iron; 3)
harshness, strength, oppression (fig.); 1a) *iron*; 1a1) *iron* *ore*;
1a2) *as* *material* *of* *furniture*, *utensils*, *implements*; #2, #8,
#200, #10, #5, #50 = chowr (H2356): 1) hole, cave; #5, #20, #200, #10,
#40 = kar (H3733): 1) howdah, palanquin, basket saddle; 2) pasture,
meadow; 3) ram, lamb, he-lamb; 4) battering-ram; 1a) an enclosed riding
space erected on a camel's saddle; #5, #20, #200, #40, #10 = Karmiy
(H3757): 1) the descendants of Carmi, the 4th son of Reuben; #6, #2,
#40, #200, #20, #2, #5 = merkabah (H4818): 1) chariot; #5, #50, #20,
#200 = nekar (H5236): 1) *foreign*, *alien*, *foreignness*, *that*
*which is foreign; 1a) *foreignness*, *foreign* *gods*; 1b) *alien*,
*foreigner*; 1c) *foreign* (*vanities*); #6, #30, #70, #9, #30, #80,
#10, #40 = `atalleph (H5847): 1) bat; #100, #90, #10, #70, #5 =
Qetsiy`ah (H7103): 1) the 2nd of the daughters born to Job after his
trial; #6, #10, #200, #4, #50, #5 = radah (H7287): 1) *to* *rule*,
*have* *dominion*, *dominate*, *tread* *down*; 2) *to* *scrape* *out*;
1a) (Qal) *to* *have* *dominion*, *rule*, *subjugate*; 1b) (Hiphil) *to*
*cause* *to* *dominate*; 2a) (Qal) to scrape, scrape out; #30, #200,
#40, #5 = rimmah (H7415): 1) maggot, worm (as cause and sign of decay);
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #333 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #9} has 12 Categories: #30,
#2, #100, #200, #1 = beqar (Aramaic) (H1240): 1) to seek, enquire; 1a)
(Pael) to enquire; 1b) (Ithpael) to let search be made; #6, #7, #200,
#70, #10, #40 = zerowa` (H2220): 1) arm, forearm, shoulder, strength;
1a) arm; 1b) arm (as symbol of strength); 1c) forces (political and
military); 1d) shoulder (of animal sacrificed); #30, #5, #8, #200, #10,
#40, #40 = charam (H2763): 1) to ban, devote, destroy utterly,
completely destroy, dedicate for destruction, exterminate; 2) to split,
slit, mutilate (a part of the body); 1a) (Hiphil); 1a1) to prohibit (for
common use), ban; 1a2) to consecrate, devote, dedicate for destruction;
1a3) to exterminate, completely destroy; 1b) (Hophal); 1b1) to be put
under the ban, be devoted to destruction; 1b2) to be devoted, be
forfeited; 1b3) to be completely destroyed; 2a) (Qal) to mutilate; 2b)
(Hiphil) to divide; #5, #10, #7, #200, #70, #1, #30, #10 = Yizre`e'liy
(H3158): 1) an inhabitant of Jezreel; #6, #40, #5, #70, #7, #200, #5 =
`azarah (H5835): 1) enclosure; 1a) ledge (surrounding Ezekiel's altar);
1b) court (outer one of temple); #6, #5, #70, #200, #2, #10, #40 = `oreb
(H6158): 1) raven; #5, #70, #200, #2, #6, #50 = `arabown (H6162): 1)
pledge, security; #30, #200, #8, #90, #5 = rachats (H7364): 1) to wash,
wash off, wash away, bathe; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to wash, wash off, wash
away; 1a2) to wash, bathe (oneself); 1b) (Pual) to be washed; 1c)
(Hithpael) to wash oneself; #5, #30, #30, #8, #50, #10, #200 = Hellenis
(G1674): 1) a Greek women; 2) a Gentile women, not a Jewess; #5, #9, #1,
#40, #2, #8, #9, #8, #200, #1, #50 = thambeo (G2284): 1) to be
astonished; 2) to astonish, terrify; 2a) to be amazed; 2b) to be
frightened; #70, #100, #3, #10, #30, #70, #50 = orgilos (G3711): 1)
prone to anger, irascible; #5, #80, #30, #1, #200, #9, #8 = plasso
(G4111): 1) to form, mould (something from clay, wax, etc.); 1a) used of
a potter;
@memeBrain [Telos: #32, Super: #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness;
I-Ching: H44 - Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting;
Tetra: 43 - Encounters, Ego: #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion]]
Nous:#24
Time:23:15 hrs
Date:2017.3.9
Torah:#10 #2 #40 %81 = #52
Dao:Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence
Tetra:#18 - Waiting
I-Ching:H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving
Latin: Operator {Word which produces all things} Alt: Eriel
{Watchfulness of God} {
1. GENERATION OF BEINGS & PHILOSOPHICAL KNOWLEDGE
2. PROTECTS & REGENERATES, LEADS TO INNER HARMONY
3. PHENOMENA OF NATURE
4. Thopibui
}
#1379 CE
VENUS [14X14 = #196 / #1379 CE / #19306 / PYTHAGOREAN SUM OF LINE
REDUCTION #2 - {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity: +
0, 9, 18 = #27}
***@zen: 4, row: 9, col: 8, nous: 24 [Super: #250 / #36 - Natural
Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance,
Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young shoot, Discovering; Tetra:
12 - Youthfulness, Ego: #354 / #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble
from Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting,
Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #250 {#81, #81, #81, #7} has 18 Categories: #40, #4,
#6, #200 = duwr (H1752): 1) to heap up, pile; 2) to dwell; 2a) (Qal);
2a1) to dwell; 2a2) heap up (imp.); #2, #40, #3, #200, #5 = megerah
(H4050): 1) saw (for stone cutting); #30, #40, #70, #50, #20, #40 =
ma`an (H4616): 1) purpose, intent prep; 1a) for the sake of; 1b) in view
of, on account of; 1c) for the purpose of, to the intent that, in order
to conj; 1d) to the end that; #6, #40, #200, #4 = Mered (H4778): 1) son
of Ezra and a descendant of Judah; #30, #5, #50, #60, #100, #5 = necaq
(Aramaic) (H5267): 1) to ascend, come up; 1a) (Aphel) to lift, take up;
1b) (Hophal) to be taken up; #50, #80, #10, #60, #10, #40 =
Nephuwsheciym (H5300): 1) a family of exiles who returned with
Zerubbabel; #20, #50, #100, #80 = noqeph (H5363): 1) striking off; #40,
#60, #70, #80 = ca`aph (H5586): 1) (Piel) to cut off, lop off boughs;
#70, #80, #30, #10, #20, #40 = `ophel (H6076): 1) hill, mound, fort,
stronghold, Ophel; 2) tumour, hemorrhoid; #30, #80, #70, #30, #40 =
po`al (H6467): 1) work, deed, doing; 1a) deed, thing done; 1b) work,
thing made; 1c) wages of work; 1d) acquisition (of treasure); #6, #50,
#80, #100, #8, #6 = paqach (H6491): 1) to open (the eyes); 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to open (the eyes); 1a2) to open (the ears); 1b) (Niphal) to be
opened; #90, #4, #100, #50, #6 = tsedeq (H6664): 1) justice, rightness,
righteousness; 1a) what is right or just or normal, rightness, justness
(of weights and measures); 1b) righteousness (in government); 1b1) of
judges, rulers, kings; 1b2) of law; 1b3) of Davidic king, Messiah; 1b4)
of Jerusalem as seat of just government; 1b5) of God's attribute; 1c)
righteousness, justice (in case or cause); 1d) rightness (in speech);
1e) righteousness (as ethically right); 1f) righteousness (as
vindicated), justification (in controversy), deliverance, victory,
prosperity; 1f1) of God as covenant-keeping in redemption; 1f2) in name
of Messianic king; 1f3) of people enjoying salvation; 1f4) of Cyrus;
#10, #90, #50, #80, #20 = tsanaph (H6801): 1) (Qal) to wrap, wrap or
wind up together, wind around; #100, #4, #40, #6, #50, #10, #40 =
qadmowniy (H6931): 1) former, ancient, eastern; 1a) former, ancient; 1b)
eastern; #100, #30, #70, #10, #40 = qela` (H7050): 1) sling,
slingstones; 2) curtain, drape, hanging; #100, #50, #90, #10 = qenets
(H7078): 1) snare, net; 1a) meaning dubious; #70, #100, #5, #60, #5, #10
= orexis (G3715): 1) desire, longing, craving for; 2) eager desire,
lust, appetite; 2a) used both in a good and a bad sense, as well of
natural and lawful and even of proper cravings (of appetite for food),
also of corrupt and unlawful desires; #80, #100, #70 = pro (G4253): 1)
before;
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #354 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #30} has 13 Categories:
#30, #8, #6, #300, #10 = Chuwshay (H2365): 1) an Archite, a friend of
David; 2) the father of Baana, an officer of Solomon; probably the same
as 1; #8, #6, #300, #40 = Chuwsham (H2367): 1) one of the early kings of
Edom; #6, #10, #8, #30, #300 = chalash (H2522): 1) to be weak, be
prostrate; 2) to weaken, disable, prostrate; 1a) (Qal) to be prostrate;
2a) (Qal) to disable, prostrate; #40, #8, #200, #6, #50, #10, #40 =
Choronayim (H2773): 1) a town of Moab; #6, #8, #300, #40 = Chashum
(H2828): 1) head of a family of 223 exiles returning with Zerubbabel; 2)
one of the priests or Levites who stood on Ezra's left while he read the
law; #30, #70, #4, #200, #10, #40 = `eder (H5739): 1) flock, herd; 1a)
flock; 1b) herds, flocks and herds; #6, #50, #90, #200, #2, #6 = tsarab
(H6866): 1) to burn, scorch; 1a) (Niphal) to be scorched; #300, #1, #3,
#10, #40 = sha'ag (H7580): 1) (Qal) to roar; 1a) of lion, conqueror,
Jehovah, cry of distress; #300, #2, #2, #10, #40 = shabab (H7616): 1)
splinters, fragment; 1a) meaning probable; #40, #300, #3, #10, #1 =
saga' (H7679): 1) to increase, grow, magnify, grow great; 1a) (Hiphil);
1a1) to make great; 1a2) to magnify, laud; #6, #30, #300, #9, #9 =
shotet (H7850): 1) scourge; #1, #3, #1, #30, #30, #10, #1, #200, #9, #8,
#50, #1, #10 = agalliao (G21): 1) to exult, rejoice exceedingly, be
exceeding glad; #70, #4, #70, #10, #200 = hodos (G3598): 1) properly; 2)
metaph.; 1a) a way; 1a1) a travelled way, road; 1b) a travellers way,
journey, travelling; 2a) a course of conduct; 2b) a way (ie. manner) of
thinking, feeling, deciding;
@memeBrain [Telos: #7, Super: #7 - Intentional Reversal, Dimming
Radiance; I-Ching: H12 - Obstruction, Stagnation, Selfish persons;
Tetra: 56 - Closed Mouth, Ego: #30 - Government without Coercion, Be
Chary of War; I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering,
Gathering together (massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing]
Nous:#25
Time:20:55 hrs
Date:2017.2.3
Torah:#70 #50 #6 %81 = #45
Dao:What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious
Tetra:#10 - Defectiveness, Distortion
I-Ching:H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing
Latin: Advitor {Infinitely good God} Alt: Rah'el {Friend of God} {
1. PROTECTS AGAINST ACCIDENTS, MAINTAINS HEALTH & HEALS
2. TRADE & BUSINESSMEN
3. BUSINESS
4. Asau
}
#111 CE
SUN [6X6 = #36 / #111 CE / #666 / PYTHAGOREAN SUM OF LINE REDUCTION #3 -
{ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy: + 0, 3, 6 = #9}
***@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 9, nous: 25 [Date: 2017.4.2, Time: 0002
hrs, Super: #462 / #67 - Three Treasures; I-Ching: H10 - Treading
(conduct), Tread Carefully, Continuing; Tetra: 48 - Ritual, Ego: #417 /
#25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious; I-Ching: H62 -
Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of the
small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness, Distortion]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #461 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #81, #56} has 21
Categories: #5, #1, #9, #40, #6, #400 = 'atam (H331): 1) to shut, shut
up, close; 1a) (Qal) to shut, stop (of lips); 1b) (Hiphil) of the wicked
stopping their ears (fig.); #1, #400, #10, #50 = 'ath (Aramaic) (H852):
1) sign, miraculous signs, wonders; #1, #400, #50, #10 = 'Ethniy (H867):
1) an ancestor of Asaph; #6, #30, #9, #2, #8, #6, #400 = tabbachah
(H2879): 1) female cook, cook; #6, #10, #400, #40, #5 = Yithmah (H3495):
1) a Moabite, one of David's mighty warriors; #6, #400, #30, #5, #9, #5,
#6 = lahat (H3857): 1) to burn, blaze, scorch, kindle, blaze up, flame;
1a) (Qal) blazing (participle); 1b) (Piel) to scorch, burn, blaze; #6,
#40, #9, #6, #400 = mowtah (H4133): 1) pole, bar of yoke; 1a) pole; 1b)
bar of yoke; 1b1) of oppression (fig.); #2, #50, #2, #6, #1, #400 =
nebuw'ah (Aramaic) (H5017): 1) prophesying; #100, #200, #90, #10, #5,
#6, #50 = qerats (Aramaic) (H7170): 1) piece; 1a) denounce, slander,
accuse maliciously, chew on (idiom); #40, #300, #40, #6, #70, #5 =
shemuw`ah (H8052): 1) report, news, rumour; 1a) report, news, tidings;
1b) mention; #6, #30, #300, #40, #70, #10, #5 = Shema`yah (H8098): 1) a
prophet of the Lord in the reign of king Rehoboam of Judah; 2) the
Nehelamite, a false prophet in the time of the prophet Jeremiah; 3)
father of Delaiah, one of the princes of Judah in the time of the
prophet Jeremiah; 4) an inhabitant of Kirjathjearim and father of
Urijah, a prophet of the Lord in the time of the prophet Jeremiah; 5) a
Judaite, son of Shechaniah, father of Hattush, and descendant of
Zerubbabel; 6) a Simeonite, father of Shimri; 7) a Reubenite, son of
Joel and father of Gog; 8) a Merarite Levite, son of Hasshub in the time
of Nehemiah; 9) a Levite, son of Galal and father of Obadiah; 10) a
Levite and head of the family of the sons of Elizaphan who were
commissioned to bring the ark to Jerusalem in the time of David; 11) a
Levite and scribe, son of Nethaneel in the time of David; 12) a Levite,
1st son of Obed-Edom in the time of David; 13) a Levite, descendant of
Jeduthun the singer in the time of king Hezekiah of Judah; 14) a Levite,
one of the messengers of Ezra to Iddo; 15) a Levite in the time of king
Jehoshaphat of Judah; 16) a Levite, one of several in charge of
distributing the free will offerings brought to God to their Levite
brethren in the time of king Hezekiah of Judah; 17) a Levite in the time
of king Josiah of Judah; 18) head of a family of exiles who returned
with Ezra; 19) a priest, of the sons of Harim who had a foreign wife in
the time of Ezra; 20) an Israelite of the sons of Harim who had a
foreign wife in the time of Ezra; 21) son of Delaiah, grandson of
Mehetabeel, and a false prophet hired by Tobiah and Sanballat to give
false guidance to Nehemiah; 22) a priest who sealed the covenant with
Nehemiah and participated in the dedication of the wall; 23) a priest
who returned from exile with Zerubbabel; 24) a leader of the people at
the dedication of the wall of Jerusalem in the time of Nehemiah; 25)
grandfather of the priest Zech; #5, #400, #50, #6 = tanah (H8566): 1) to
hire; 1a) (Qal) to hire; 1b) (Hiphil) to hire (a prostitute), give
amorous favours; #1, #4, #10, #20, #8, #200, #8, #10, #200 = adikeo
(G91): 1) absolutely; 2) transitively; 1a) to act unjustly or wickedly,
to sin,; 1b) to be a criminal, to have violated the laws in some way;
1c) to do wrong; 1d) to do hurt; 2a) to do some wrong or sin in some
respect; 2b) to wrong some one, act wickedly towards him; 2c) to hurt,
damage, harm; #1, #50, #5, #80, #5, #200, #70, #50 = anapipto (G377): 1)
to lie back, lie down; 2) to recline at a table, to sit back; #4, #70,
#60, #1, #7, #8, #300, #1, #10 = doxazo (G1392): 1) to think, suppose,
be of opinion; 2) to praise, extol, magnify, celebrate; 3) to honour, do
honour to, hold in honour; 4) to make glorious, adorn with lustre,
clothe with splendour; 4a) to impart glory to something, render it
excellent; 4b) to make renowned, render illustrious; 4b1) to cause the
dignity and worth of some person or thing to become manifest and
acknowledged; #5, #60, #8, #3, #5, #10, #300, #70 = exegeomai (G1834):
1) to lead out, be leader, go before; 2) metaph., to draw out in
narrative, unfold a teaching; 2a) to recount, rehearse; 2b) to unfold,
declare; 2b1) the things relating to God; 2b2) used in Greek writing of
the interpretation of things sacred and divine, oracles, dreams, etc.;
#5, #80, #1, #10, #300, #5, #10, #50 = epaiteo (G1871): 1) to ask
besides, ask for more; 2) to ask again and again, importunately; 3) to
beg, to ask alms; #20, #1, #50, #70, #50, #70, #200 = kanon (G2583): 1)
a rod or straight piece of rounded wood to which any thing is fastened
to keep it straight; 2) a definitely bounded or fixed space within the
limits of which one's power of influence is confined; 3) metaph. any
rule or standard, a principle or law of investigating, judging, living,
acting; 1a) used for various purposes; 1a1) a measuring rod, rule; 1a2)
a carpenter's line or measuring tape; 1a3) the measure of a leap, as in
the Olympic games; 2a) the province assigned one; 2b) one's sphere of
activity; #20, #1, #300, #8, #100, #3, #8, #20, #1 = katargeo (G2673):
1) to render idle, unemployed, inactivate, inoperative; 2) to cause to
cease, put an end to, do away with, annul, abolish; 1a) to cause a
person or thing to have no further efficiency; 1b) to deprive of force,
influence, power; 2a) to cease, to pass away, be done away; 2b) to be
severed from, separated from, discharged from, loosed from any one; 2c)
to terminate all intercourse with one; #80, #100, #1, #10, #70, #200 =
praos (G4235): 1) gentle, mild, meek; #80, #100, #10, #200, #20, #1, #50
= Priska (G4251): 1) a Christian woman, the wife of Aquila;
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #417 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #81, #12} has 20
Categories: #400, #5, #6, #2, #4 = 'abad (Aramaic) (H7): 1) to perish,
vanish; 1a) (P'al) shall perish; 1b) (Aphel) destroy; 1c) (Hophal) be
destroyed; #1, #50, #300, #10, #50, #6 = 'enowsh (H582): 1) man, mortal
man, person, mankind; 1a) of an individual; 1b) men (collective); 1c)
man, mankind; #2, #400, #10, #5 = Bithyah (H1332): 1) a daughter of a
Pharaoh and wife of Mered of Judah; #6, #400, #3, #8 = giyach (H1518):
1) to burst forth; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to burst forth; 1a2) to draw forth;
1a3) to bring forth; 1b) (Hiphil) to break forth; #6, #300, #10, #90,
#10, #1 = yetsa' (Aramaic) (H3319): 1) (Shaphel) to bring to an end,
finish, bring out to an end; #20, #40, #7, #200, #100, #10, #40 = mizraq
(H4219): 1) bowl, basin; 1a) bowl (for wine); 1b) basin (vessel for
throwing or tossing a liquid); #6, #30, #40, #10, #300, #1, #30 =
Miysha'el (H4332): 1) the godly friend of Daniel who Nebuchadnezzar
renamed Meshach; one of the three friends who with Daniel refused to
make themselves unclean by eating food from the king's table which went
against the dietary laws which God had given the Jews; also one of the
three who were thrown into the fiery furnace for refusing to bow down to
a graven image of Nebuchadnezzar and who were saved by the angel of the
Lord; 2) a son of Uzziel and a cousin of Moses and Aaron; 3) one of
those who stood at the left hand of Ezra when he read the law to the
people; #40, #300, #2, #70, #5 = soba` (H7648): 1) satiety, abundance,
fullness; 1a) satiety; 1b) abundance; #6, #300, #40, #70, #1 = Shim`a'
(H8092): 1) son of David by Bathsheba; 2) brother of David, the 3rd son
of Jesse; 3) a Gershonite Levite, father of Berachiah, and grandfather
of Asaph; 4) a Merarite Levite, son of Uzzah, and father of Haggiah; 2a)
also 'Shammah', 'Shimma', and 'Shimeah'; #300, #50, #1, #6, #50, #10 =
sin'ah (H8135): 1) hating, hatred, hate; 1a) hatred; 1a1) of man, God;
#5, #400, #6, #6 = tavah (H8428): 1) (Hiphil) to pain, wound, trouble,
cause pain; 1a) meaning probable; #1, #50, #1, #9, #5, #40, #1, #300,
#10 = anathema (G331): 1) a thing set up or laid by in order to be kept;
2) a thing devoted to God without hope of being redeemed, and if an
animal, to be slain; therefore a person or thing doomed to destruction;
1a) specifically, an offering resulting from a vow, which after being
consecrated to a god was hung upon the walls or columns of the temple,
or put in some other conspicuous place; 2a) a curse; 2b) a man accursed,
devoted to the direst of woes; #2, #70, #8, #9, #8, #200, #70, #50 =
boetheo (G997): 1) to help, succour, bring aid; #5, #50, #1, #50, #300,
#10, #1 = enantios (G1727): 1) over against, opposite; 2) metaph.; 1a)
of place, opposite, contrary (of the wind); 2a) opposed as an adversary,
hostile, antagonistic in feeling or act; 2b) an opponent; #5, #80, #10,
#2, #1, #100, #8, #200, #1, #10 = epibareo (G1912): 1) to put a burden
upon, to load; 2) to be burdensome; #20, #1, #20, #70, #80, #1, #9, #5,
#10, #1, #200 = kakopatheia (G2552): 1) the suffering of evil, ie.
trouble, distress, afflicted; #40, #1, #10, #50, #5, #300, #1, #10 =
mainomai (G3105): 1) to be mad, to rave; 1a) of one who so speaks that
he seems not to be in his right mind; #70, #3, #4, #70, #70, #200 =
ogdoos (G3590): 1) the eighth; #80, #100, #70, #8, #30, #9, #70, #50 =
proerchomai (G4281): 1) to go forward, go on; 2) to go before; 2a) to go
before, precede; 2b) to go before, in the advance of another; #5, #300,
#1, #60, #1, #50 = tasso (G5021): 1) to put in order, to station; 1a) to
place in a certain order, to arrange, to assign a place, to appoint;
1a1) to assign (appoint) a thing to one; 1b) to appoint, ordain, order;
1b1) to appoint on one's own responsibility or authority; 1b2) to
appoint mutually, ie. agree upon;
@memeBrain [Telos: #56, Super: #56 - Abstruse Mysterious Virtuosity;
I-Ching: H55 - Abundance, Abounding, Fullness; Tetra: 46 - Enlargement,
Ego: #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining from Desire;
I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra: 25 -
Contention]
Nous:#13
Time:22:55 hrs
Date:2017.3.4
Torah:#200 #1 #5 %81 = #44
Dao:Status, Loathing Shame
Tetra:#17 - Holding Back
I-Ching:H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving
Latin: Compatiens {God who sees all} Alt: Salyah {Measure Out the Law of
God} {
1. HELPS FIND LOST OR STOLEN OBJECTS & MAKE KNOWN WHO REMOVED THEM
2. RENOWN, FORTUNE & SUCCESSION
3. LAWS & JUDGES
4. Chontare
}
#1105 CE
SUN [6X6 = #36 / #111 CE / #666 / PYTHAGOREAN SUM OF LINE REDUCTION #7 -
{ie. 10. MANIFESTING NORM (NORMA DENUNTIANS) / *DO* *NOT* *COVET*
{122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2}}
***@zen: 4, row: 9, col: 7, nous: 13 [Super: #341 / #23 -
Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 -
Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has been
spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 26 - Endeavor, Ego: #440 / #13
- Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending,
Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #341 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #17} has 15 Categories: #1,
#40, #300 = 'emesh (H570): 1) yesterday, last night; 2) recently (fig.);
#40, #5, #40, #6, #200, #10, #40 = yarah (H3384): 1) to throw, shoot,
cast, pour; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to throw, cast; 1a2) to cast, lay, set; 1a3)
to shoot arrows; 1a4) to throw water, rain; 1b) (Niphal) to be shot; 1c)
(Hiphil); 1c1) to throw, cast; 1c2) to shoot; 1c3) to point out, show;
1c4) to direct, teach, instruct; 1c5) to throw water, rain; #40, #90,
#6, #200, #5 = metsuwrah (H4694): 1) siege-works, stronghold, rampart;
1a) siege-works; 1b) rampart; #5, #40, #200, #6, #90 = merowts (H4793):
1) running, race, course; #6, #50, #70, #200, #10, #5 = Ne`aryah
(H5294): 1) one of the 6 sons of Shemaiah in the line of the royal
family of David of the tribe of Judah in the time after the captivity;
2) son of Ishi and one of the captains of the 500 Simeonites who, in the
days of king Hezekiah of Judah, drove out the Amalekites from Mount
Seir; #60, #80, #200, #1 = capher (Aramaic) (H5613): 1) scribe,
secretary; #6, #5, #70, #10, #200, #10, #40 = `ayir (H5895): 1) he-ass,
male ass; #5, #80, #6, #200, #10, #40 = Puwr (H6332): 1) lot; 1a) a
special feast among the post-exilic Jews, to celebrate their deliverance
from Haman's destruction through queen Esther's heroic actions; #6, #5,
#200, #20, #60, #10, #40 = rekec (H7406): 1) roughness or bound up,
impeded, the impassable or mountain chain, rough place; 1a) meaning
dubious; #5, #300, #1, #30, #5 = she'elah (H7596): 1) request, thing
asked for, demand; 1a) request, petition; 1b) thing asked for; #30,
#300, #3, #3, #5 = shegagah (H7684): 1) sin, sin of error or
inadvertence, inadvertent sin; 1a) error; #1, #60, #10, #70, #200 =
axios (G514): 1) weighing, having weight, having the weight of another
thing of like value, worth as much; 2) befitting, congruous,
corresponding to a thing; 3) of one who has merited anything worthy; 3a)
both in a good and a bad sense; #2, #30, #1, #2, #5, #100, #1, #200 =
blaberos (G983): 1) hurtful, injurious; #5, #80, #70, #50, #70, #40, #1,
#7, #8, #10 = eponomazo (G2028): 1) to put a name upon, name; 2) to be
named; #20, #70, #10, #30, #10, #1, #200 = koilia (G2836): 1) the whole
belly, the entire cavity; 2) the lower belly, the lower region, the
receptacle of the excrement; 3) the gullet; 4) the womb, the place where
the foetus is conceived and nourished until birth; 5) the innermost part
of a man, the soul, heart as the seat of thought, feeling, choice; 1a)
the upper [ie. stomach] and the lower belly are distinguished; 3a) to be
given up to the pleasures of the palate, to gluttony; 4a) of the uterus
of animals;
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #440 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #81, #35} has 19
Categories: #3, #30, #6, #400, #1 = galuwth (Aramaic) (H1547): 1) exile;
#400, #8, #2, #30 = chabal (H2254): 1) to bind; 2) to take a pledge, lay
to pledge; 3) to destroy, spoil, deal corruptly, offend; 4) to bring
forth, travail; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to bind; 2a) (Qal) to hold by a pledge,
take in pledge, hold in pledge; 2b) (Niphal) to give a pledge, become
pledged; 3a) (Qal) to spoil, corrupt, offend; 3b) (Niphal) to be ruined;
3c) (Piel) to destroy, ruin; 3d) (Pual) to be ruined, be broken; 4a)
(Piel) to writhe, twist, travail; #30, #10, #5, #6, #300, #80, #9 =
Yehowshaphat (H3092): 1) son of king Asa and himself king of Judah for
25 years; one of the best, most pious, and prosperous kings of Judah; 2)
son of Nimshi and father of king Jehu of the northern kingdom of Israel;
3) son of Ahilud and chronicler under David and Solomon; 4) son of
Paruah and one of the 12 commissary officers under Solomon; 5) a priest
and trumpeter in the time of David; 6) symbolical name of a valley near
Jerusalem which is the place of ultimate judgment; maybe the deep ravine
which separates Jerusalem from the Mount of Olives through which the
Kidron flowed; #30, #40, #20, #50, #300 = kanash (Aramaic) (H3673): 1)
to gather; 1a) (P'al) to gather; 1b) (Ithpael) gathered (participle);
#40, #40, #20, #40, #300 = Mikmac (Ezra 2:27 (H4363): 1) a city in
Benjamin lying near Ramah and approximately 10 miles (16 km) north of
Jerusalem; probably modern 'Mukhmas'; #40, #300, #100 = mesheq (H4943):
1) acquisition, possession, son of possession, heir; #30, #100, #10,
#300 = Qiysh (H7027): 1) a Benjamite of the family of Matri, father of
king Saul; 2) an ancestor of Mordecai; 3) son of Gibeon and brother of
Abdon, Zur, Baal, Ner, Nadab, Gedor, Ahio, Zechariah, and Mikloth; uncle
of Kish the father of king Saul; 4) a Merarite Levite, son of Mahli and
grandson of Merari the progenitor of the family; 5) a Merarite Levite,
son of Abdi in the time of king Hezekiah of Judah; #40, #300, #30, #20,
#10, #40 = shalak (H7993): 1) to throw, cast, hurl, fling; 1a) (Hiphil);
1a1) to throw, cast, throw away, cast off, shed, cast down; 1a2) to cast
(lots) (fig); 1b) (Hophal); 1b1) to be thrown, be cast; 1b2) to be cast
forth or out; 1b3) to be cast down; 1b4) to be cast (metaph); #300, #80,
#10, #10, #40 = shephiy (H8205): 1) bareness, smooth or bare height,
bare place, high places, barren height; 1a) bareness; 1b) bare place,
bare height; #400, #40 = tam (H8535): 1) perfect, complete; 1a)
complete, perfect; 1a1) one who lacks nothing in physical strength,
beauty, etc; 1b) sound, wholesome; 1b1) an ordinary, quiet sort of
person; 1c) complete, morally innocent, having integrity; 1c1) one who
is morally and ethically pure; #1, #50, #5, #9, #5, #300, #70 =
anatithemi (G394): 1) to set forth (in words), communicate; #1, #80,
#70, #30, #1, #40, #2, #1, #50, #70, #40, #5, #50 = apolambano (G618):
1) to receive; 2) to take again or back, to recover; 3) to take from
others, take apart or aside; 4) to receive any one hospitably; 1a) of
what is due or promised; 2a) to receive by way of retribution; #40, #70,
#50, #70, #10, #200 = monos (G3441): 1) alone (without a companion),
forsaken, destitute of help, alone, only, merely; #50, #70, #5, #10,
#300, #5 = noeo (G3539): 1) to perceive with the mind, to understand, to
have understanding; 2) to think upon, heed, ponder, consider; #50, #70,
#200, #70, #50 = nosos (G3554): 1) disease, sickness; #70, #100, #70,
#200 = oros (G3735): 1) a mountain; #80, #1, #9, #8, #40, #1, #300, #1 =
pathema (G3804): 1) that which one suffers or has suffered; 2) an
enduring, undergoing, suffering; 1a) externally, a suffering,
misfortune, calamity, evil, affliction; 1a1) of the sufferings of
Christ; 1a2) also the afflictions which Christians must undergo in
behalf of the same cause which Christ patiently endured; 1b) of an
inward state, an affliction, passion; #80, #5, #50, #300, #5 = pente
(G4002): 1) five; #200, #80, #10, #30, #70, #50 = spilos (G4696): 1) a
spot; 2) a fault, moral blemish; 2a) of base and gluttonous men;
@memeBrain [Telos: #17, Super: #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 -
Marriageable Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner, Ego:
#35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence; I-Ching: H17 -
Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following]
----------
But let me just say that like the Chinese #81 x 4.5 day = 364.5 natural
year calendar had a Grand Inception on the midnight new moon as solstice
of 21 December 103 BCE.
Upon which hangs your Scientific Opinion of the Pythagorean TETRAD
METHODOLOGY as (binary) HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER, being the Western
orientation of the year and our millennium, century and decade calendar
to this day.
DOES HE DENY THIS HISTORICAL FACT?
The alternate hom*oIOS (ternary as TETRAGRAMMATON) THEORY OF NUMBER is a
22/7 = RATIONAL PI perspective as being ipso facto: 7 x 24 x 13 (2184
days / 364 day solar year = 6 or 2184 / 354 day lunar year + 2 x 30 day
lunar intercalated months) x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364 days or 365.2423 x 293
tropical years which was always superior to the Julian calendar.
SO WHAT IS YOUR BOAST?
This view of the cosmogony suggests that the Big Bang occurred as
instantiation at some point in temporal relativity of the Equinox of
Wednesday 20 March / New Moon on Thursday 21 March and from whence our
notion of infinity is derived.
That the perspective of 6,000 years is not as Lawrence Krauss suggests
by a straw man argument as being concerned with the age of earth /
universe but of temporal relativity within infinity and by which we
ANCHOR and apply our MIND understanding of the meta-descriptor
prototypes as the (Gk.) COURSE-trouchos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]
for ALL TIME as ETERNITY.
"Verily, verily, I say unto thee, We speak that we do know, and testify
that we have seen; and ye receive not our witness.
If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye
believe, if I tell you of heavenly things?
And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from
heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.
And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the
Son of man be lifted up:
That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that
whosoever believeth in him should not perish [as you will perish
Lawrence Krauss], but have *EVERLASTING* *LIFE*.
For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that
the world through him might be saved.
He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is
condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only
begotten Son of God.
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men
loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the
light, lest his deeds should be reproved.
But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made
manifest, that they are wrought in God." [John 3:11-21 (KJV)]
That the 6,000 year reprise of this understanding of (Gk.)
NATURE-genesis occurred on the Equinox of Wednesday 20 March 1996 / New
Moon of 21 March 1996.
For a visualisation of this see the following HEBREW CALENDAR link:
-
http://www.hebcal.com/hebcal/?v=1&maj=on&min=on&nx=on&i=off&year=1996&month=x&yt=G&lg=s&c=off&geo=geoname&zip=&city=&geonameid=&b=18&m=50&.s=Create+Calendar
FRED ESPENAK'S NASA 50 YEAR ECLIPSE COMPUTATIONS SHOW REPEATED SOLAR
ECLIPSE GEO-LOCATIONS AS HAVING A SUFFICIENTLY CLOSE APPROXIMATION
SUGGESTING THIS BASE-7 (7^2 = JUBILEES, 7^1 = WEEKS, 7^0 = DAYS) VIEW OF
THE COSMOGONY THEORY IS CORRECT.
In that, according to FRED ESPENAK'S computations, the Solar Eclipse of
4 December 2002 will have a geo-location reprise within 28 years.
In order to disprove this theory of 6,000 year relativity within
infinity as occurred on the equinox of Wednesday 20 March 1996 / New
Moon on Thursday 21 March 1996 as I have shown, you must demonstrate
that this cosmological conjunction did not occur 6,000 years prior as
like the Chinese present day calendar had a Grand Inception upon the
midnight of 21 December 103 BCE, in being a consciousness of that
cosmological reality which you have not only continually ignored the
asserted facts but denied the reality as having no plausibility.
WHAT SORT OF IMPARTIAL SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY IS THAT?
-----------
And within his journal entry for Tuesday 25 December 1770, Cook was too
pre-occupied at Batavia to record whether he celebrated Christmas Day.
He was busy preparing the repaired {ie.
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #397 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #73} = #50, #1, #300, #40,
#6 = 'asham (H816): 1) *TO* *OFFEND*, *BE *GUILTY*, *TRESPASS*; 2)
(TWOT) *TO* *BE* *DESOLATE*, *ACKNOWLEDGE* *OFFENSE*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
*TO* *DO* *WRONG*, *OFFEND*, *TRESPASS*, *COMMIT* *AN* *OFFENSE*, *DO*
*INJURY*; 1a2) *TO* *BE* *OR* *BECOME* *GUILTY*; 1A3) *TO* *BE* *HELD*
*GUILTY*; 1A4) *TO* *BE* *INCRIMINATED*; 1b) (Niphal) *TO* *SUFFER*
*PUNISHMENT*; 1c) (Hiphil) *TO* *DECLARE* *GUILTY*;
#6, #1, #300, #40, #10, #40 = 'ashem (H818): 1) *GUILTY*, *FAULTY*
(*AND* *OBLIGED* *TO* *OFFER* *A* *GUILT*-*OFFERING*)}
Endeavour for sea and its return voyage to England.
But he did find the time to record in his journal the details of a
squabble {ie.
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #397 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #73} = #5, #300, #2, #90 =
shabats (H7661): 1) *CRAMP*, *AGONY*, *ANGUISH*; 1a) *MEANING* *DUBIOUS*;
#1, #80, #70, #4, #5, #4, #5, #10, #3, #40, #5, #50, #70, #50 =
apodeiknumi (G584): 1) *TO* *POINT* *AWAY* *FROM* *ONE'S* *SELF*, *TO*
*POINT* *OUT*, *SHOW* *FORTH*, *TO* *EXPOSE* *TO* *VIEW*, *EXHIBIT*; 2)
*TO* *DECLARE*, *TO* *SHOW, *TO* *PROVE* *WHAT* *KIND* *OF* *PERSON*
*ANYONE* *IS*, *TO* *PROVE* *BY* *ARGUMENTS*, *DEMONSTRATE*;
} with Dutch Naval Officers over a seaman who had run from one of their
ships and joined Endeavour.
According to the Dutch, the runner was a Danish seaman {i.e..
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #397 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #73} = #1, #30, #30, #70,
#3, #5, #50, #8, #200 = allogenes (G241): 1) *SPRUNG* *FROM* *ANOTHER*
*RACE*, *A* *FOREIGNER*, *ALIEN*;
}, and Cook agreed that he would deliver the man back to them if he
found they were correct.
When the runner was not returned to them the Dutch General sent one of
his captains over to see Cook with evidence that the man was Danish as
the entry in their ship's book stated that he was from Elsinore. Cook
told the Dutch captain that he considered {ie.
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #397 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #73} = #6, #30, #300, #50,
#10, #1 = lishshan (Aramaic) (H3961): 1) *TONGUE*, *LANGUAGE*; 1a)
*TONGUE*, *LANGUAGE*; 1b) *PEOPLE* (*FIGURATIVE*);
#5, #40, #80, #1, #10, #60, #1, #200 = empaizo (G1702): 1) *TO* *PLAY*
*WITH*, *TRIFLE* *WITH*; 1a) *TO* *MOCK*; 1b) *TO* *DELUDE*, *DECEIVE*;
} the man to be English and as such he refused to give him up.
It's just that the record of this *MEANDERER* {ie.
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #359 = #300, #6, #3, #10, #40 = shagah (H7686): 1)
*TO* *GO* *ASTRAY*, *STRAY*, *ERR*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO* *ERR*, *STRAY*;
1a2) *TO* *SWERVE*, *MEANDER*, *REEL*, *ROLL*, *BE* *INTOXICATED*, *ERR*
(*IN* *DRUNKENNESS*); 1a3) *TO* *GO* *ASTRAY* (*MORALLY*); 1a4) *TO*
*COMMIT* *SIN* *OF* *IGNORANCE* *OR* *INADVERTENCE*, *ERR*
(*IGNORANTLY*); 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) *TO* *LEAD* *ASTRAY*; 1b2) *TO*
*LEAD* *ASTRAY*, *MISLEAD* (*MENTALLY*); 1b3) *TO* *LEAD* *ASTRAY*
(*MORALLY*)
} event from the Irish sailor jumping on board his ship occurs on the
Christmas Day conveys several CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING for this day of
25 December 1770, and the consideration as to what priority emphasis is
given to the following notions:
@1) - SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #359 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #35} = #5, #300, #40,
#9, #5 = shemittah (H8059): 1) *LETTING* *DROP* *OF* *EXACTIONS,
(*TEMPORARY*) *REMITTING*, *RELEASE* (*FROM* *DEBT*)
@2) - SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #359 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #35} = #4, #5, #60,
#10, #70, #10, #200 = dexios (G1188): 1) *THE* *RIGHT*, *THE* *RIGHT*
*HAND*; 2) *METAPHOR*; 2a) *A* *PLACE* *OF* *HONOUR* *OR* *AUTHORITY*;
@3 - SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #359 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #35} = #20, #5, #50,
#70, #4, #70, #60, #70, #10 = kenodoxos (G2755): 1) *GLORYING* *WITHOUT*
*REASON*, *CONCEITED*, *VAIN* *GLORIOUS*, *EAGER* *FOR* *EMPTY* *GLORY*;
@4 - SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #359 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #35} = #5, #200, #8,
#40, #1, #50, #5, #50 = semaino (G4591): 1) *TO* *GIVE* *A* *SIGN*, *TO*
*SIGNIFY*, *INDICATE*; 2) *TO* *MAKE* *KNOWN*;
@5 - #50, #1, #300, #40, #6 = 'asham (H816): 1) *TO* *OFFEND*, *BE
*GUILTY*, *TRESPASS*; 2) (TWOT) *TO* *BE* *DESOLATE*, *ACKNOWLEDGE*
*OFFENSE*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO* *DO* *WRONG*, *OFFEND*, *TRESPASS*,
*COMMIT* *AN* *OFFENSE*, *DO* *INJURY*; 1a2) *TO* *BE* *OR* *BECOME*
*GUILTY*; 1A3) *TO* *BE* *HELD* *GUILTY*; 1A4) *TO* *BE* *INCRIMINATED*;
1b) (Niphal) *TO* *SUFFER* *PUNISHMENT*; 1c) (Hiphil) *TO* *DECLARE*
*GUILTY*;
@6 - EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #397 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #73} #6, #1, #300,
#40, #10, #40 = 'ashem (H818): 1) *GUILTY*, *FAULTY* (*AND* *OBLIGED*
*TO* *OFFER* *A* *GUILT*-*OFFERING*);
@7 - EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #397 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #73} = #1, #80, #70,
#4, #5, #4, #5, #10, #3, #40, #5, #50, #70, #50 = apodeiknumi (G584): 1)
*TO* *POINT* *AWAY* *FROM* *ONE'S* *SELF*, *TO* *POINT* *OUT*, *SHOW*
*FORTH*, *TO* *EXPOSE* *TO* *VIEW*, *EXHIBIT*; 2) *TO* *DECLARE*, *TO*
*SHOW, *TO* *PROVE* *WHAT* *KIND* *OF* *PERSON* *ANYONE* *IS*, *TO*
*PROVE* *BY* *ARGUMENTS*, *DEMONSTRATE*;
@8 - EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #397 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #73} = #5, #40, #80,
#1, #10, #60, #1, #200 = empaizo (G1702): 1) *TO* *PLAY* *WITH*,
*TRIFLE* *WITH*; 1a) *TO* *MOCK*; 1b) *TO* *DELUDE*, *DECEIVE*;
@9 - EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #397 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #73} = #80, #30, #8,
#9, #70, #200 = plethos (G4128): 1) *A* *MULTITUDE*; 1a) *A* *GREAT*
*NUMBER*, *OF* *MEN* *OR* *THINGS*; 1b) *THE* *WHOLE* *NUMBER*, *THE*
*WHOLE* *MULTITUDE*, *THE* *ASSEMBLAGE*; 1B1) *THE* *MULTITUDE* *OF*
*THE* *PEOPLE*;
Banks also entered the details of this incident in his journal. His
account contains one detail that is missing from Cook's journal.
According to Banks, Cook knew from the runner's accent which country he
came from, and it was not Denmark - it was Ireland!
So who was this man who decided to jump ship on the other side of the
world? The Muster Roll of the Endeavour lists 19 men who were taken on
board at Batavia. They were initially taken on as Supernumeraries but,
as so many of the ship's crew died during its passage across the Indian
Ocean, Cook enlisted these 19 men as part of the ship's complement. Only
one of these men had a country of origin against his name - John Marra,
from Cork, Ireland. So it seems reasonable to assume that it was Marra
who ran from the Dutch ship to join the Endeavour at Batavia; to date
this has been merely an assumption.
The Dutch Naval Officers who met with Captain Cook were from the Dutch
East India Company, known in Dutch as the Vereenigde Oostindische
Compagnie or VOC. This was an international trading company with
colonies around the world including extensive possessions in what is now
known as Malaysia.
The records of the VOC are preserved by the Dutch National Archives,
which recently has completed a project to make them accessible via the
Internet. The VOC website allows visitors to search for a particular
ship, or for the name of a crew member.
The records of the VOC are preserved by the Dutch National Archives,
which recently has completed a project to make them accessible via the
Internet. The VOC website allows visitors to search for a particular
ship, or for the name of a crew member.
A search of this website for the names of all of the "Batavia 19"
resulted in only one "hit", and that was for John Marra - or Jan Mara as
he appears on the records of the ship Schoonzigt. He had enlisted at
Rotterdam as a seaman on 10 April 1770, claiming that he was from the
Danish port of Elseneur (Elsinore). This declaration was needed to get
around one of the orders that had been issued by the "Bewindhebbers"
(the Board of Directors) of the VOC *WHICH* *HAD* *AS* *A*
*CORPORATION*, *NO* *LESS* *A* *SOVEREIGN* *AUTHORITY* *THAN* *DID*
*CAPTAIN* *JAMES**COOK* *AS* *A* *BRITISH* *NAVAL *OFFER*.
The VOC was a private commercial corporation operating free from the
direct Control of the government of the United Netherlands, yet it would
have the authority to make decisions in the name of that government. The
VOC could:
1) Make treaties and declare war or peace in the name of the States General,
2) Construct forts and arm them with cannons, hire troops,
3) *Establish* *colonies,
4) Dispense justice, and
5) Enact laws,
6) Even issue its own currency--its coins were not stamped with the
symbol of a nation or head of state, but with the company insignia.
*THE* *VOC* *WOULD* *ESSENTIALLY* *OPERATE* *AS* *A* *STATE* *WITHIN*
*A* *STATE*.
That the specific order given assent to by the VOC was that ships were
not allowed "to contract people from the East, or Norwegians, nor
Frenchmen, Englishmen or Scotsmen" which is understood to have been
issued by the "Bewindhebbers" (the Board of Directors) of the VOC, which
one can than argue that is a lawful order relating to several CATEGORIES
OF UNDERSTANDING on that specific day which are equivalent to
mathematical theoretical noumenon defined the meta-descriptor prototypes
which are prerequisite to the BEING of hom*o[IOS] SAPIEN[T] as EXISTENCE:
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #397 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #73} = #1, #30, #30, #70,
#3, #5, #50, #8, #200 = allogenes (G241): 1) *SPRUNG* *FROM* *ANOTHER*
*RACE*, *A* *FOREIGNER*, *ALIEN* / #6, #30, #300, #50, #10, #1 =
lishshan (Aramaic) (H3961): 1) *TONGUE*, *LANGUAGE*; 1a) *TONGUE*,
*LANGUAGE*; 1b) *PEOPLE* (*FIGURATIVE*)}
That our present day Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43
of Act 2006 defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is,
if it is permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A
HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF hom*o[IOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS
INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING
AND RATIONALITY.”
Furthermore, when the redacted (ie. as not by the mystical Pythagorean
esoteric reduction, but by a modulo value:
#81 - PROPOUNDING THE ESSENTIAL; I-CHING: H11 - PEACE, PERVADING,
GREATNESS; TETRA: 15 - REACH;
And by ipso facto its #CENTRE:
#41 - PLAYING WITH REVERSAL, SAMENESS IN DIFFERENCE; I-CHING: H26 -
RESTRAINING FORCE; TETRA: 60 - ACCUMULATION
As being not being derived from the ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE USE OF THE
PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER AS BINOMIAL (bifurcated gender and
spermatic attributes) NOMENCLATURE, BUT RATHER THE JEWISH-GREEK-DAOist
[BARBARIAN {SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #486 = #2, #1, #100, #2, #1, #100, #70,
#10, #200 = barbaros (G915)}] hom*oIOS NOMENCLATURE IS THEN:
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ 1, 2, 3 {ie. Formula of Progression of individual phenomena}
H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41 as #CENTRE
H54 + H18 + H6 + H3 = #81 as #WAN WU
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS hom*oIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
Computations applied to the conduct of the Dutch General are observed as
being relative and having fidelity to the theoretical mathematical
noumenon. In that Dutch General had sent {
@memeBrain [Telos: #35, Super: #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of
Benevolence; I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 -
Following, Ego: #73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46 -
Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent]
} one of his captains over to see Cook with evidence that the man was
Danish as the entry in their ship's book {
***@zen: 4, row: 7, col: 9, nous: 15 [Super: #359 / #1 - To Guide
with Names, Reason's Realisation; I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra:
24 - Joy, Ego: #397 / #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of
Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning;
Tetra: 1 - Centre]
} stated that he was from Elsinore.
That there is exhibits an intellectual intuition which is complaint with
the "COURSE-trouchos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] and is therefore in
accord with a VOC organisation having a SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY and
exercising its POWERS in accord the Nature, law, order and fair and
equitable justice.
As expressed in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (published in 1781),
human understanding is structured by "concepts of the understanding", or
pure categories of understanding found prior to experience in the mind,
and which make outer experiences possible as counterpart to the rational
faculties of the mind.
By Kant's account, when one employs a concept to describe or categorize
noumena (the objects of inquiry, investigation or analysis of the
workings of the world), one is employing a way of describing or
categorizing phenomena (the observable manifestations of those objects
of inquiry, investigation or analysis). Kant posited methods by which
human understanding makes sense of and thus intuits phenomena that
appear to the mind: the concepts of the transcendental aesthetic, as
well as that of the transcendental analytic, transcendental logic and
transcendental deduction. Taken together, Kant's "categories of
understanding" are the principles of the human mind which necessarily
are brought to bear in attempting to understand the world in which we
exist (that is, to understand, or attempt to understand, "things in
themselves"). In each instance the word "transcendental" refers to the
process that the human mind must exercise to understand or grasp the
form of, and order among, phenomena. Kant asserts that to "transcend" a
direct observation or experience is to use reason and classifications to
strive to correlate with the phenomena that are observed.[citation
needed] Humans can make sense out of phenomena in these various ways,
but in doing so can never know the "things-in-themselves", the actual
objects and dynamics of the natural world in their noumenal dimension -
this being the negative correlate to phenomena and that which escapes
the limits of human understanding. By Kant's Critique, our minds may
attempt to correlate in useful ways, perhaps even closely accurate ways,
with the structure and order of the various aspects of the universe, but
cannot know these "things-in-themselves" (noumena) directly. Rather, we
must infer the extent to which the human rational faculties can reach
the object of "things-in-themselves" by our observations of the
manifestations of those things that can be perceived via the physical
senses, that is, of phenomena, and by ordering these perceptions in the
mind infer the validity of our perceptions to the rational categories
used to understand them in a rational system, this rational system
(transcendental analytic), being the categories of the understanding as
free from empirical contingency.
According to Kant, objects of which we are cognizant via the physical
senses are merely representations of unknown somethings—what Kant refers
to as the transcendental object—as interpreted through the a priori or
categories of the understanding. These unknown somethings are manifested
within the noumenon—although we can never know how or why as our
perceptions of these unknown somethings via our physical senses are
bound by the limitations of the categories of the understanding and we
are therefore never able to fully know the "thing-in-itself"
Kant also makes a distinction between positive and negative noumena:
If by 'noumenon' we mean a thing so far as it is not an object of our
sensible intuition, and so abstract from our mode of intuiting it, this
is a noumenon in the negative sense of the term.
But if we understand by it an object of a non-sensible intuition, we
thereby presuppose a special mode of intuition, namely, the
intellectual, which is not that which we possess, and of which we cannot
comprehend even the possibility. This would be 'noumenon' in the
positive sense of the term.
The positive noumena, if they existed, would be immaterial entities that
can only be apprehended by a special, non-sensory faculty: "intellectual
intuition". Kant doubts that we have such a faculty, because for him
intellectual intuition would mean that thinking of an entity, and its
being represented, would be the same. He argues that humans have no way
to apprehend positive noumena:
What is observed is Governance undertaken by the VOC which is complaint
with a Natural / Common Law derived SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY {ie. Realm of
its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law: + 0, #27, #54 = #81} by
which such Corporation has properly CONSTITUTED, ORDERED, AND DECLARED
PUBLICLY such a racial exclusion law within their realm: {ie. System's
Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity: + 0, 9, 18} and that there
were properly in effect racial constraints placed upon the {Self
identity - Formula of Autonomy: + 0, #3, #6 = #9} as expressing a valid
{Formula of Progression of individual phenomena: + #1, #2, #3 = #6}
Since, it was a contemporaneous perspective however, that such a type of
intuition, intellectual intuition, forms no part whatsoever of our
faculty of knowledge, it follows that the employment of the categories
can never extend further than to the objects of experience. Doubtless,
indeed, there are intelligible entities corresponding to the sensible
entities; there may also be intelligible entities to which our sensible
faculty of intuition has no relation whatsoever; but our concepts of
understanding, being mere forms of thought for our sensible intuition,
could not in the least apply to them. That, therefore, which we entitle
'noumenon' must be understood as being such only in a negative sense.
That Captain James Cook was intentionally engaging within a deceptive,
derisive as defrauding conduct {ie.
@8 - EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #397 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #73} = #5, #40, #80,
#1, #10, #60, #1, #200 = empaizo (G1702): 1) *TO* *PLAY* *WITH*,
*TRIFLE* *WITH*; 1a) *TO* *MOCK*; 1b) *TO* *DELUDE*, *DECEIVE*}
"Now I would not have you ignorant, brethren, that oftentimes I purposed
to come unto you, (but was let hitherto,) that I might have some fruit
among you also, even as among other Gentiles.
I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians {
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #486 = #2, #1, #100, #2, #1, #100, #70, #10, #200 =
barbaros (G915): 1) *ONE* *WHOSE* *SPEECH* *IS* *RUDE*, *ROUGH* *AND*
*HARSH*; 2) *ONE* *WHO* *SPEAKS* *A* *FOREIGN* *OR* *STRANGE* *LANGUAGE*
*WHICH* *IS* *NOT* *UNDERSTOOD* *BY* *ANOTHER*; 3) *USED* *BY* *THE*
*GREEKS* *OF* *ANY* *FOREIGNER* *IGNORANT* *OF* *THE* *GREEK*
*LANGUAGE*, *WHETHER* *MENTAL* *OR* *MORAL*, *WITH* *THE* *ADDED*
*NOTION* *AFTER* *THE* *PERSIAN* *WAR*, *OF* *RUDENESS* *AND*
*BRUTALITY*. *THE* *WORD* *IS* *USED* *IN* *THE* *NEW* *TESTAMENT*
*WITHOUT* *THE* *IDEA* *OF* *REPROACHFULNESS*
} both to the wise, and to the unwise. So, as much as in me is, I am
ready to preach the gospel to you that are at Rome also.
For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God
unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also
to the Greek.
For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as
it is written, The just shall live by faith.
For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and
unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath
showed it unto them.
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are
clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his
eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither
were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish
heart was darkened.
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like
to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping
things.
Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of
their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the
creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
Excerpts from the T'AI HSUAN CHING (CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY) as
commentary on Tetragram #16 - CONTACT as meta-descriptor (outside time)
prototypes as published within 4 BCE, it specifically states '*THE*
*WISE* *PERSON* (ie. hom*o[IOS] SAPIEN[T]) *AVOIDS* *CONTACT* *WITH*
*LESSER*, *BESTIAL* (ie. HETEROS: #15 (9) - SATURN ... #34 (16) -
JUPITER ... #65 (25) - MARS as MALEFICIENT IN BEING FASCIST AS IDEA
SOURCE FOR THE *SWASTIKA* WHICH IS SHOWN BELOW) *MEN*, *LEST* *HE* *BE*
*INFLUENCED *FOR* *THE* *WORSE*':
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indcXA0OWJZWnBhc1k
MALEFICENT (adjective)
- literary causing harm or destruction, especially by supernatural means.
- Astrology relating to the planets Saturn and Mars, traditionally
considered to have an unfavourable influence.
MALFEANCE (noun)
- (LAW) the performance by a public official of an act that is legally
unjustified, harmful, or contrary to law; wrongdoing used especially of
an act in violation of a public trust; Word of the Day for 1 March 2017;
www.dictionary.com
As encapsulated knowledge, it concerns a perspective of the
SOVEREIGN/MARRIAGE and the supposed peace dynamic as the microcosm being
expressed by a Natural / Common law syllogism and an egalitarian
SOVEREIGN AUTONOMOUS RIGHT aligned to time and associated with a
rational conception of PI (3W1D as ipso facto: 7 x 24 x 13 x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2423 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / New Moon Thursday 21 March 1996) as then distinctly, a
different septet macrocosm perspective of the decalogue as a
circ*mscribing of consciousness being fundamental to existence
articulated by the hom*oIOS THEORY OF NUMBER:
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indMGV4Qks3RmctVVU
And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave
them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not
convenient; Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication,
wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate,
deceit, malignity; whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, despiteful,
proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
without understanding, covenant-breakers, without natural affection,
implacable, unmerciful: Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which
commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have
pleasure in them that do them." [Romans 1:13-25; 28-32 (KJV)]
In the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant abandons the attempt to prove the
existence of God although Kant's real intention is to attempt to
disprove the non-existence of God. Rather than proving the existence of
God, Kant is really trying to disprove the non-existence of God since no
one can prove the non-existence of God. In abandoning any attempt to
prove the existence of God, Kant declares the three proofs of rational
theology known as the ontological, the cosmological and the
physico-theological as quite untenable.
This specific order relating to the enlistment of sailors stated that
ships were expressly prohibited "to contract people from the East, or
Norwegians, nor Frenchmen, Englishmen or Scotsmen". Irrespective of
whether it was more than likely that Marra was recruited by a
"Zielverkooper" - a naval agent who was paid for enlisting people for
duty on VOC ships.
That in Cook dishonestly telling the "the Dutch captain that he
considered the man to be English and as such he refused to give him up"
and that this action , seeks to invalidated and release the sailor from
his contractual obligations and indebtmess {#5, #300, #40, #9, #5 =
shemittah (H8059): 1) *LETTING* *DROP* *OF* *EXACTIONS, (*TEMPORARY*)
*REMITTING*, *RELEASE* (*FROM* *DEBT*)} to the Dutch VOC State Authority:
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #397 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #73} = #50, #1, #300, #40,
#6 = 'asham (H816): 1) *TO* *OFFEND*, *BE *GUILTY*, *TRESPASS*; 2)
(TWOT) *TO* *BE* *DESOLATE*, *ACKNOWLEDGE* *OFFENSE*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
*TO* *DO* *WRONG*, *OFFEND*, *TRESPASS*, *COMMIT* *AN* *OFFENSE*, *DO*
*INJURY*; 1a2) *TO* *BE* *OR* *BECOME* *GUILTY*; 1A3) *TO* *BE* *HELD*
*GUILTY*; 1A4) *TO* *BE* *INCRIMINATED*; 1b) (Niphal) *TO* *SUFFER*
*PUNISHMENT*; 1c) (Hiphil) *TO* *DECLARE* *GUILTY*;
#6, #1, #300, #40, #10, #40 = 'ashem (H818): 1) *GUILTY*, *FAULTY*
(*AND* *OBLIGED* *TO* *OFFER* *A* *GUILT*-*OFFERING*)}
@3 - SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #359 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #35} = #20, #5, #50,
#70, #4, #70, #60, #70, #10 = kenodoxos (G2755): 1) *GLORYING* *WITHOUT*
*REASON*, *CONCEITED*, *VAIN* *GLORIOUS*, *EAGER* *FOR* *EMPTY* *GLORY*;
@4 - SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #359 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #35} = #5, #200, #8,
#40, #1, #50, #5, #50 = semaino (G4591): 1) *TO* *GIVE* *A* *SIGN*, *TO*
*SIGNIFY*, *INDICATE*; 2) *TO* *MAKE* *KNOWN*;
Thereby, such wilful and incriminating unlawful acts of dishonesty
renders Captain James Cook, not only submissive to any penalty which
can be lawfully imposed by this SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY, but by his
unbridged attempt to circumvent the non-permissibility of "contracting
people from the East, or Norwegians, nor Frenchmen, Englishmen or
Scotsmen", that it not only disqualifies his glorying within the claim,
that he has a legitimate entitlement any new discovery if indeed any at
all as he has falsely stated within his 22 August 1770 journal entry,
"[since I] sic. may land no more upon this Eastern coast of New Holland,
and on the Western side I can make no new discovery the honour {ie.
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #359 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #35} = #4, #5, #60, #10,
#70, #10, #200 = dexios (G1188): 1) *THE* *RIGHT*, *THE* *RIGHT* *HAND*;
2) *METAPHOR*; 2a) *A* *PLACE* *OF* *HONOUR* *OR* *AUTHORITY*
} of which belongs to the Dutch navigators and as such they may lay
Claim to it as their property." [Journal, 22 August 1770 p 387, n. 4]
And neither can Captain Cook be said to have and merit of BRITISH
SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY by his acting as it's right hand as to be capable by
the POWER of the sentiment encapsulated by sovereign battle cry and
judicial motto: DEIU ET MON DROIT, of invalidating DUTCH SOVEREIGN
ENTITLEMENT.
Captains of the VOC's ships may have turned a blind eye to the above
order, as their ships had a constant need for new crew due to the high
mortality {SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #359 = #80, #3, #200, #10, #20, #40 =
peger (H6297): 1) *corpse*, *carcass*, *monument*, *stela*; 1a) *corpse*
(*of* (*man*); 1b) *carcass* (*of* *animals*);} rate on long voyages."
-
http://www.captaincooksociety.com/home/detail/who-was-the-runner-at-batavia
Nous:#14
Time:
Date:2017.4.4
Torah:#10 #5 #5 %81 = #20
Dao:Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics)
Tetra:#9 - Branching Out
I-Ching:H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest
Latin: Refugium {Supreme Being} Alt: Chamyah {In the Midst of God} {
1. HELPS OBTAIN WISDOM & KNOWLEDGE
2. PHILOSOPHERS & THE ENLIGHTENED
3. VIRTUE IN SOLITUDE FROM WORLDLY CONCERNS
4. Oroasoer
}
#65 CE
- http://www.grapple369.com?zen:5,row:1,col:5,nous:14
***@zen: 5, row: 1, col: 5, nous: 14 [Date: 2017.4.2, Time: 0236
hrs, Super: #486 / #76 - Strength's Warning Signs, Revealers of Virtue;
I-Ching: H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 64 -
Sinking, Ego: #219 / #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics);
I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 -
Branching Out]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #486 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #81, #81} has 28
Categories: #30, #3, #2, #6, #30, #400, #10, #5 = gebuwlah (H1367): 1)
border, boundary; #6, #40, #4, #30, #6, #400 = dallah (H1803): 1) hair,
threads, thrum (threads of warp hanging in loom); 2) poor (usually coll
of helpless people); 3) (TWOT) poorest, lowest; #30, #10, #6, #400, #40
= Yowtham (H3147): 1) son of king Uzziah of Judah by Jerushah; king of
Judah for 16 years and contemporary with Isaiah and king Pekah of
Israel; 2) son of Jahdai and a descendant of Caleb and Judah; 3)
youngest son of Gideon who escaped from the massacre of his brothers;
#400, #10, #30, #10, #30, #6 = yalal (H3213): 1) (Hiphil) to howl, wail,
make a howling; #10, #60, #6, #4, #400, #6 = yecuwdah (H3248): 1)
foundation; 1a) founding of city; #400, #20, #60, #6 = kacac (H3699): 1)
(Qal) to estimate, reckon, compute; #6, #40, #20, #200, #20, #200 =
karar (H3769): 1) (Pilpel) to whirl, dance; 1a) whirling, dancing
(participle); #6, #30, #40, #8, #2, #400 = machabath (H4227): 1) flat
plate, pan, griddle; 1a) for baking; #300, #80, #100, #6 = cepheq
(H5607): 1) handclapping, mocking, mockery, scorn; 1a) meaning dubious;
#6, #400, #70, #3, #2, #5 = `agab (H5689): 1) (Qal) to have inordinate
affection or lust; 1a) lust (participle); 1b) paramours (participle as
subst); #70, #10, #6, #400 = `Aviyth (H5762): 1) the city of Hadad
Ben-Bedad, one of the kings of Edom; #70, #6, #400, #10 = `Uwthay
(H5793): 1) son of Ammihud and a descendant of Pharez of Judah; 2) one
of the sons of Bigvai who returned from exile with the 2nd caravan with
Ezra; #6, #70, #40, #300, #60, #10 = `Amashcay (H6023): 1) a priest, son
of Azareel in the time of Nehemiah; #6, #70, #400, #10 = `Attay (H6262):
1) a Judaite, grandson of Sheshan the Jerahmeelite by daughter Ahlai
whom he gave in marriage to Jarha, his Egyptian slave; his grandson
Zabad was one of David's mighty warriors; 2) one of the lion-faced
warriors of Gad, captains of the host, who joined David in the
wilderness; 3) the 2nd son of king Rehoboam of Judah by Maachah, the
daughter of Absalom; #100, #30, #300, #6, #50 = qilleshown (H7053): 1)
forks, three-pronged pitchfork, goad; 1a) meaning dubious; #50, #400,
#30, #6 = talah (H8518): 1) to hang; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to hang; 1a1a) to
hang up (any object); 1a1b) to put to death by hanging; 1b) (Niphal) to
be hanged; 1c) (Piel) to hang, hang up (for display); #6, #400, #30,
#40, #10 = Talmay (H8526): 1) one of the 3 sons of the giant Anak who
were slain by the men of Judah; 2) son of Ammihud, king of Geshur, later
king of Geshur himself, and father of Maacah, the mother of Absalom and
wife of David; #1, #3, #1, #30, #30, #10, #1, #200, #10, #200 =
agalliasis (G20): 1) exultation, extreme joy, gladness At feasts, people
were anointed with the oil of gladness. Paul, in He. 1:9, is alluding to
this inaugural ceremony of anointing, and uses it as an emblem of the
divine power and majesty to which to which the Son of God has been
exalted.; #2, #1, #100, #2, #1, #100, #70, #10, #200 = barbaros (G915):
1) one whose speech is rude, rough and harsh; 2) one who speaks a
foreign or strange language which is not understood by another; 3) used
by the Greeks of any foreigner ignorant of the Greek language, whether
mental or moral, with the added notion after the Persian war, of
rudeness and brutality. The word is used in the N.T. without the idea of
reproachfulness.; #3, #100, #1, #40, #40, #1, #300, #1 = gramma (G1121):
1) a letter; 2) any writing, a document or record; 3) letters, ie.
learning; 2a) a note of hand, bill, bond, account, written
acknowledgement of a debt; 2b) a letter, an epistle; 2c) the sacred
writings (of the OT); 3a) of sacred learning; #5, #10, #200, #10, #1,
#200, #10, #50 = eiseimi (G1524): 1) to go into, enter; #5, #60, #1,
#100, #5, #10, #300, #5 = exairo (G1808): 1) to lift up or take away out
of a place; 2) to remove; #10, #30, #1, #200, #20, #5, #200, #9, #1, #10
= hilaskomai (G2433): 1) to render one's self, to appease, conciliate to
one's self; 2) to expiate, make propitiation for; 1a) to become
propitious, be placated or appeased; 1b) to be propitious, be gracious,
be merciful; #20, #1, #300, #70, #10, #20, #5, #10, #50 = katoikeo
(G2730): 1) to dwell, settle; 2) to dwell in, inhabit; 1a) metaph.
divine powers, influences, etc., are said to dwell in his soul, to
pervade, prompt, govern it; 2a) God is said to dwell in the temple, ie.
to be always present for worshippers For Synonyms see entry 5854; #20,
#100, #8, #300, #8, #50 = Krete (G2914): 1) the largest and most fertile
island of the Mediterranean archipelago or Aegean Sea, now the modern
Candia; #80, #1, #10, #4, #1, #100, #10, #70, #10, #200 = paidarion
(G3808): 1) little boy, a lad; #200, #1, #10, #50, #5, #200, #9, #1, #10
= saino (G4525): 1) to wag the tail; 2) metaph.; 1a) of dogs; 2a) to
flatter, fawn upon; 2b) to move (the mind of one); 2b1) agreeably; 2b2)
to agitate, disturb, trouble; #300, #1, #40, #10, #5, #10, #70, #50 =
tameion (G5009): 1) a storage chamber, storeroom; 2) a chamber esp. an
inner chamber; 3) a secret room;
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #219 {#81, #81, #57} has 7 Categories: #6, #3, #4,
#6, #200 = Gedor (H1446): 1) a son of Penuel; 2) a son of Jered; 3) a
Benjamite of Gibeon; 4) a town in the mountainous part of Judah a few
miles north of Hebron; #8, #6, #100, #100, #5 = Chuqqog (H2712): 1) a
town on the boundary of Naphtali; #2, #8, #200, #9 = cheret (H2747): 1)
an engraving tool, stylus, chisel, graving tool; 1a) graving tool; 1b)
stylus; #9, #6, #200, #4 = tarad (H2956): 1) to pursue, chase, be
continuous; 1a) (Qal) dripping (participle); #10, #80, #3, #70, #6, #50
= paga` (H6293): 1) to encounter, meet, reach, entreat, make
intercession; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to meet, light upon, join; 1a2) to meet
(of kindness); 1a3) to encounter, fall upon (of hostility); 1a4) to
encounter, entreat (of request); 1a5) to strike, touch (of boundary);
1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to cause to light upon; 1b2) to cause to entreat;
1b3) to make entreaty, interpose; 1b4) to make attack; 1b5) to reach the
mark; #5, #200, #6, #4, #4 = radad (H7286): 1) to beat down, beat out,
subdue; 1a) (Qal) to beat down (fig); 1b) (Hiphil) to beat out; #3, #1,
#7, #8, #200 = gaza (G1047): 1) the royal treasury, treasure, riches;
@memeBrain [Telos: #81, Super: #81 - Propounding the Essential; I-Ching:
H11 - Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 15 - Reach, Ego: #57 - Laissez
Faire Politics, Simplicity In Habits; I-Ching: H37 - The Family (the
clan), Dwelling People, Family members; Tetra: 39 - Residence]
If you take the Grapple model of the 'hom*oIOTIC KABBALISTIC NOUMENON' as
outlined, then being an applicable paradigm for an acceptable common
mindset between professional bodies and industry for the governance of
values, change and knowledge cohesion, ideas methodology and information
presentation. You ought to also recognise, that in having such
prototyping tools of cognition and consciousness, the intrusions of the
past may not necessarily need to occur.
Consensus ad idem: Meeting of the minds (also referred to as mutual
agreement, mutual assent or consensus ad idem) is a phrase in contract
law used to describe the intentions of the parties forming the contract.
In particular it refers to the situation where there is a common
understanding in the formation of the contract. This condition or
element is often considered a necessary requirement to the formation of
a contract. [Ref: Wikipedia 2012: Consensus ad idem]
TRANSFORMATIVE IMPERATIVE AS 'CHAD' GOVERNANCE (c² (25 as #65 - MARS /
SOLDIER) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN / MARRIAGE/SOVEREIGN DYNAMIC) + b² (16
as #34 - JUPITER) v's JEWISH-GREEK-DAOist hom*oIOIS TRINOMIAL NOMENCLATURE):
Nous:#67
Time:18:00 hrs
Date:2017.12.22
Torah:
Dao:Three Treasures
Tetra:#48 - Ritual
I-Ching:H10 - Treading (conduct), Tread Carefully, Continuing
***@zen: 1, row: 7, col: 9, nous: 67 [Time: 1800 hrs, Super: #291
/ #67 - Three Treasures; I-Ching: H10 - Treading (conduct), Tread
Carefully, Continuing; Tetra: 48 - Ritual, Ego: #471 / #67 - Three
Treasures; I-Ching: H10 - Treading (conduct), Tread Carefully,
Continuing; Tetra: 48 - Ritual]
@memeBrain [Telos: #48, Super: #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35
- Advance, Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance, Ego: #66 -
Strategic Reversal, Putting Oneself Behind; I-Ching: H41 - Diminution,
Decrease, Diminishing; Tetra: 55 - Diminishment]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #291 {#81, #81, #81, #48} has 17 Categories: #1, #20,
#200, #10, #20, #40 = 'ikkar (H406): 1) plowman, husbandman, farmer; 1a)
working the land, yet not owning any of it; #1, #30, #60, #200 =
'Ellacar (H495): 1) a town in Babylonia, c. 28 miles (50 km) E of Ur;
#10, #1, #200, #10, #20, #50 = 'arak (H748): 1) to be long, prolong; 1a)
(Qal) to be long; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to prolong (days); 1b2) to make
long (tent cords); 1b3) to grow long, continue long; #20, #1, #200, #20,
#50 = 'orek (H753): 1) length; 2) forbearance, self-restraint (of
patience); 1a) physical length; 1b) of time; #1, #200, #40, #10, #40 =
'Arammiy (H761): 1) a thing or a person from Syria or Aram; #30, #3, #2,
#6, #200, #10, #40 = gibbowr (H1368): 1) strong, mighty n m; 2) strong
man, brave man, mighty man; #30, #4, #200, #1, #6, #50 = dera'own
(H1860): 1) aversion, abhorrence; #30, #10, #5, #6, #200, #40 = Yehowram
(H3088): 1) son of king Jehoshaphat of Judah and himself king of Judah
for 8 years; his wife was the wicked Athaliah who was probably the
instigator for his returning the nation of Judah to the worship of Baal;
2) son of king Ahab of the northern kingdom of Israel and king of Israel
himself for 12 years; he was murdered by Jehu on the plot of land for
which his father had murdered Naboth thus fulfilling the prophecy of
Elijah to the very letter; 3) a priest in the reign of Jehoshaphat; #6,
#10, #70, #200, #5 = Ya`rah (H3294): 1) a descendant of Saul, son of
Micah, great grandson of Mephibosheth; #40, #40, #1, #10, #200 = ma'ar
(H3992): 1) (Hiphil) to pain, prick, irritate, be in pain; #80, #6,
#200, #5 = puwrah (H6333): 1) winepress; #6, #80, #200, #5 = Purah
(H6513): 1) the servant of Gideon, probably his armour-bearer; #200, #1,
#40, #10, #40 = re'em (H7214): 1) probably the great aurochs or wild
bulls which are now extinct. The exact meaning is not known.; #200, #40,
#30, #10, #5, #6 = Remalyahuw (H7425): 1) father of king Pekah of the
northern kingdom of Israel; #200, #6, #40, #40, #5 = ramam (H7426): 1)
to be exalted, be lifted up; 1a) (Qal) to be exalted; 1b) (Niphal) to
lift oneself; #6, #200, #80, #5 = rapheh (H7504): 1) slack; #40, #50,
#1, #200 = mna (G3414): 1) in the OT, a weight of 300 shekels was one
pound; 2) In the NT, a weight and sum of money equal to 100 drachmae,
one talent was 100 pounds, a pound equalled 10 1/3 oz. (300 gm);
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #471 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #81, #66} has 18
Categories: #6, #1, #8, #10, #40, #6, #400 = 'Achiymowth (H287): 1) a
son of Elkanah, a Levite; #30, #1, #40, #400 = 'emeth (H571): 1)
firmness, faithfulness, truth; 2) in truth, truly; 1a) sureness,
reliability; 1b) stability, continuance; 1c) faithfulness, reliableness;
1d) truth; 1d1) as spoken; 1d2) of testimony and judgment; 1d3) of
divine instruction; 1d4) truth as a body of ethical or religious
knowledge; 1d5) true doctrine adv; #30, #40, #400, #1 = 'athah (Aramaic)
(H858): 1) to come, arrive; 2) used in the NT in the phrase 'maranatha'
- 'Lord come'; 1a) (P'al) to come; 1b) (Aphel) to bring; 1c) (Hophal) to
be brought; #6, #10, #400, #3, #50, #2 = ganab (H1589): 1) to steal,
steal away, carry away; 1a) (Qal) to steal; 1b) (Niphal) to be stolen;
1c) (Piel) to steal away; 1d) (Pual) to be stolen away, be brought by
stealth; 1e) (Hithpael) to go by stealth, steal away; #5, #10, #20, #30,
#6, #400 = heykal (H1964): 1) palace, temple, nave, sanctuary; 1a)
palace; 1b) temple (palace of God as king); 1c) hall, nave (of Ezekiel's
temple); 1d) temple (of heavenly temple); #20, #5, #40, #6, #400 = hamah
(H1993): 1) to murmur, growl, roar, cry aloud, mourn, rage, sound, make
noise, tumult, be clamorous, be disquieted, be loud, be moved, be
troubled, be in an uproar; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to growl; 1a2) to murmur
(fig. of a soul in prayer); 1a3) to roar; 1a4) to be in a stir, be in a
commotion; 1a5) to be boisterous, be turbulent; #10, #400, #5, #6, #50 =
yath (Aramaic) (H3487): 1) (mark of the direct object or the accusative
and not translated); #6, #40, #300, #70, #50, #5 = mish`enah (H4938): 1)
support (of every kind), staff; #10, #400, #50, #3, #8 = nagach (H5055):
1) to push, thrust, gore; 1a) (Qal) to gore; 1b) (Piel) to push or
thrust at; 1c) (Hithpael) to engage in thrusting, wage war; #50, #20,
#1, #400 = neko'th (H5219): 1) a spice; 1a) perhaps tragacanth gum; #60,
#6, #400, #5 = cuwth (H5497): 1) garment, vesture; #5, #60, #400, #6 =
cethav (H5638): 1) winter, rainy season; #5, #40, #80, #200, #6, #90,
#10, #40 = parats (H6555): 1) to break through or down or over, burst,
breach; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to break or burst out (from womb or enclosure);
1a2) to break through or down, make a breach in; 1a3) to break into;
1a4) to break open; 1a5) to break up, break in pieces; 1a6) to break out
(violently) upon; 1a7) to break over (limits), increase; 1a8) to use
violence; 1a9) to burst open; 1a10) to spread, distribute; 1b) (Niphal)
to be broken through; 1c) (Pual) to be broken down; 1d) (Hithpael) to
break away; #1, #50, #5, #10, #30, #5, #300, #70 = anaireo (G337): 1) to
take up, to lift up (from the ground); 2) to take away, abolish; 1a) to
take up for myself as mine; 1b) to own (an exposed infant); 2a) to do
away with or abrogate customs or ordinances; 2b) to put out of the way,
kill slay a man; #20, #1, #100, #80, #70, #200 = karpos (G2590): 1)
fruit; 2) that which originates or comes from something, an effect,
result; 1a) the fruit of the trees, vines, of the fields; 1b) the fruit
of one's loins, ie. his progeny, his posterity; 2a) work, act, deed; 2b)
advantage, profit, utility; 2c) praises, which are presented to God as a
thank offering; 2d) to gather fruit (ie. a reaped harvest) into life
eternal (as into a granary), is used in fig. discourse of those who by
their labours have fitted souls to obtain eternal life; #20, #30, #10,
#200, #10, #1, #200 = klisia (G2828): 1) a hut erected to pass the night
in; 2) a tent; 3) anything to recline on; 4) a company reclining; 3a) a
chair in which to lean back the head; 3b) a reclining chair; 4a) a row
or party of persons reclining at meal; #70, #200, #1, #200 = hosos
(G3745): 1) as great as, as far as, how much, how many, whoever; #70,
#400, #1 = oua (G3758): 1) ah! ha! an interjection of wonder and amazement;
PLANE 7 (vYELLOW): (#361) #59 - A Sensible Guide, Hold Fast To Reason /
(#140) #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity
3 {*TERCE* @ 0900 hours} / a² (9 as #15 - SATURN / MARRIAGE/SOVEREIGN
DYNAMIC)
Nous:#40
Time:09:00 hrs
Date:2017.8.7
Torah:#40 #10 #20 %81 = #70
Dao:Reversal, Avoiding Activity
Tetra:#68 - Dimming
I-Ching:H36 - Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light,
Brilliance injured, Intelligence hidden
Latin: Justitia {Virtue of God, House of God, Like unto God} Alt: Keliel
{Vessel for God} {
1. HELPS & PROTECTS THE SAFETY OF DECISIONS
2. MONARCH, NOBLES, GOVERNORS
3. UNCOVERS CONSPIRACIES
4. Arpien
}
Ahaz {One that takes or possesses}
***@zen: 1, row: 4, col: 6, nous: 40 [Time: 0900 hrs, Super: #396
/ #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 - Suppression of the
Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured, Intelligence hidden;
Tetra: 68 - Dimming, Ego: #275 / #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity;
I-Ching: H36 - Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light,
Brilliance injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming]
@memeBrain [Telos: #72, Super: #72 - Self-Love, Holding Oneself Dear;
I-Ching: H39 - Adversity, Obstacles, Limping, Obstruction, Afoot; Tetra:
79 - Difficulties, Ego: #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness;
I-Ching: H44 - Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting;
Tetra: 43 - Encounters]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #396 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #72} has 18 Categories: #5,
#6, #300, #70, #10, #5 = Howsha`yah (H1955): 1) a prince of Judah who
assisted in the dedication of the wall of Jerusalem in the time of
Nehemiah; 2) the father of Jezaniah (or Azariah) who was a man of note
after the destruction of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar in the time of
Jeremiah; #30, #10, #200, #100, #6, #50 = yeraqown (H3420): 1) mildew,
paleness, lividness; 1a) mildew, rust; 1b) paleness; #6, #10, #300, #70,
#10 = Yish`iy (H3469): 1) son of Appaim, one of the line of Jerahmeel of
the house of Hezron; 2) a chief of Manasseh and head of a family on the
east of Jordan; 3) a chief of Judah, father of Zoheth; 4) a chief of
Simeon and head of a family; #20, #40, #300, #30, #6 = moshel (H4915):
1) dominion from 04911; TWOT - 1258c; n m; 2) likeness, one like,
similitude; #6, #10, #50, #300, #30 = nashal (H5394): 1) to slip off,
drop off, clear away, draw off; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slip or drop off;
1a2) to draw off; 1a3) to clear away; 1b) (Piel) to clear out
completely, clear entirely; #6, #70, #80, #200, #40 = `aphar (H6083): 1)
dry earth, dust, powder, ashes, earth, ground, mortar, rubbish; 1a) dry
or loose earth; 1b) debris; 1c) mortar; 1d) ore; #6, #90, #80, #10,
#200, #10 = tsaphiyr (H6842): 1) he-goat; #10, #300, #2, #8, #6, #50,
#20 = shabach (H7623): 1) to soothe, still, stroke; 2) to laud, praise,
commend; 1a) (Piel) to soothe, still; 1b) (Hiphil) stilling
(participle); 2a) (Piel); 2a1) to laud, praise (God); 2a2) to commend,
congratulate (the dead); 2b) (Hithpael) to boast; #40, #300, #1, #10,
#5, #40 = show' (H7722): 1) ravage n f; 2) devastation, ruin, waste; 2a)
devastation, ruin; 2b) ruin, waste (of land); #30, #300, #6, #50, #10 =
Shuwniy (H7764): 1) son of Gad and progenitor of the family of Shunites;
#300, #6, #70, #20 = shuwa` (H7769): 1) cry, cry for help, cry out; 2)
opulence; 2a) meaning dubious; #30, #300, #50, #10, #1, #5 = saniy'
(H8146): 1) hated, held in aversion; #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #200,
#70, #50 = anagkazo (G315): 1) to necessitate, compel, drive to,
constrain; 1a) by force, threats, etc.; 1b) by permission, entreaties,
etc.; 1c) by other means; #1, #80, #300, #5, #10 = hapto (G681): 1) to
fasten to, adhere to; 1a) to fasten fire to a thing, kindle, set of
fire; #3, #1, #30, #1, #300, #10, #1, #50 = Galatia (G1053): 1) the
Roman province of Galatia my be roughly described as the central region
of the peninsula of Asia Minor, bounded on the north by Bithynia and
Paphlagonia; on the east by Pontus; on the south by Cappadocia and
Lycaonia; on the west by Phrygia; #10, #1, #5, #10, #100, #70, #200 =
Iaeiros (G2383): 1) a ruler of a synagogue, probably near the western
shore of the Sea of Galilee; #40, #5, #30, #1, #50, #70, #200 = melan
(G3188): 1) ink; #80, #5, #100, #3, #8, #200 = Perge (G4011): 1) a town
in Pamphylia, on the river Cestius, at a distance of 7 miles (10 km)
from its mouth, and famous in antiquity for the worship of Artemis (Diana);
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #275 {#81, #81, #81, #32} has 10 Categories: #6, #30,
#2, #200, #7, #30 = barzel (H1270): 1) iron; 2) tool of iron; 3)
harshness, strength, oppression (fig.); 1a) iron; 1a1) iron ore; 1a2) as
material of furniture, utensils, implements; #2, #8, #200, #10, #5, #50
= chowr (H2356): 1) hole, cave; #5, #20, #200, #10, #40 = kar (H3733):
1) howdah, palanquin, basket saddle; 2) pasture, meadow; 3) ram, lamb,
he-lamb; 4) battering-ram; 1a) an enclosed riding space erected on a
camel's saddle; #5, #20, #200, #40, #10 = Karmiy (H3757): 1) the
descendants of Carmi, the 4th son of Reuben; #6, #2, #40, #200, #20, #2,
#5 = merkabah (H4818): 1) chariot; #5, #50, #20, #200 = nekar (H5236):
1) foreign, alien, foreignness, that which is foreign; 1a) foreignness,
foreign gods; 1b) alien, foreigner; 1c) foreign (vanities); #6, #30,
#70, #9, #30, #80, #10, #40 = `atalleph (H5847): 1) bat; #100, #90, #10,
#70, #5 = Qetsiy`ah (H7103): 1) the 2nd of the daughters born to Job
after his trial; #6, #10, #200, #4, #50, #5 = radah (H7287): 1) to rule,
have dominion, dominate, tread down; 2) to scrape out; 1a) (Qal) to have
dominion, rule, subjugate; 1b) (Hiphil) to cause to dominate; 2a) (Qal)
to scrape, scrape out; #30, #200, #40, #5 = rimmah (H7415): 1) maggot,
worm (as cause and sign of decay);
PLANE 8 (vCYAN): (#429) #68 - Coinciding with Nature, Complying With
Heaven / (#149) #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing Placidity
6 {*SEXT* @ 1200 hours} b² (16 as #34 - JUPITER)
Nous:#25
Time:12:00 hrs
Date:2017.9.24
Torah:#70 #50 #6 %81 = #45
Dao:What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious
Tetra:#10 - Defectiveness, Distortion
I-Ching:H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing
Latin: Advitor {Infinitely good God} Alt: Rah'el {Friend of God} {
1. PROTECTS AGAINST ACCIDENTS, MAINTAINS HEALTH & HEALS
2. TRADE & BUSINESSMEN
3. BUSINESS
4. Asau
}
#111 CE
@memeBrain [Super: #51 - Natural Guides and Nursing Virtuosity; I-Ching:
H47 - Oppression (exhaustion), Confining, Entangled; Tetra: 69 -
Exhaustion, Ego: #69 - Profound Use, Function of the Mysterious;
I-Ching: H34 - Great Strength, Great Invigorating, The power of the
great, Great maturity; Tetra: 22 - Resistance]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #456 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #81, #51} has 33
Categories: #6, #30, #50, #300, #10, #20, #40 = 'ishshah (H802): 1)
woman, wife, female; 1a) woman (opposite of man); 1b) wife (woman
married to a man); 1c) female (of animals); 1d) each, every (pronoun);
#2, #3, #400, #50, #1 = Bigthan (H904): 1) a eunuch in king Ahasuerus'
(Xerxes) court; #6, #30, #3, #1, #10, #6, #400 = gay' (H1516): 1)
valley, a steep valley, narrow gorge; #3, #200, #3, #200, #10, #40 =
gargar (H1620): 1) berry, olive berry; #6, #10, #30, #4, #6, #400 =
yaldah (H3207): 1) girl, damsel, marriageable girl; #6, #50, #20, #300,
#30, #10, #40 = kashal (H3782): 1) to stumble, stagger, totter; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to stumble; 1a2) to totter; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to stumble;
1b2) to be tottering, be feeble; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to cause to stumble,
bring injury or ruin to, overthrow; 1c2) to make feeble, make weak; 1d)
(Hophal) to be made to stumble; 1e) (Piel) bereave; #30, #6, #400, #20 =
levath (Aramaic) (H3890): 1) to, at, beside, near, with; #6, #30, #400,
#20 = lethek (H3963): 1) barley-measure; 1a) uncertain measurement but
thought to be half an homer - 5 ephahs; #6, #30, #40, #300, #30, #10,
#40 = mashal (H4912): 1) proverb, parable; 1a) proverb, proverbial
saying, aphorism; 1b) byword; 1c) similitude, parable; 1d) poem; 1e)
sentences of ethical wisdom, ethical maxims; #6, #40, #300, #40, #70 =
Mishma` (H4927): 1) one of the 12 sons of Ishmael; 2) son of Mibsam of
the family of Simeon; #6, #40, #300, #70, #40 = Mish`am (H4936): 1) a
Benjamite, son of Elpaal and descendant of Shaharaim; #5, #2, #9, #400,
#40 = nabat (H5027): 1) to look, regard; 1a) (Piel) to look; 1b)
(Hiphil); 1b1) to look; 1b2) to regard, show regard to, pay attention
to, consider; 1b3) to look upon, regard, show regard to; #1, #80, #300,
#70, #5 = pasa` (H6585): 1) (Qal) to step, march, step forward; #5,
#100, #300, #1, #10, #40 = qishshu' (H7180): 1) cucumber; #6, #30, #200,
#100, #10, #100, #10 = raqiyq (H7550): 1) thin cake, wafer; #5, #300,
#1, #50, #50, #10, #40 = sha'anan (H7600): 1) at ease, quiet, secure; 2)
security, pride, arrogance; 1a) at ease, secure; 1b) at ease, careless,
wanton, arrogant subst; 2a) one at ease; 2b) arrogance; #10, #300, #6,
#80, #50, #10 = shuwph (H7779): 1) to bruise, crush, gape upon, desire?,
seize?, strike out?; 1a) (Qal) to fall upon, bruise; #6, #40, #300, #20,
#10, #30, #10, #40 = sakal (H7919): 1) to be prudent, be circ*mspect,
wisely understand, prosper; 2) (Piel) to lay crosswise, cross (hands);
1a) (Qal) to be prudent, be circ*mspect; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to look at
or upon, have insight; 1b2) to give attention to, consider, ponder, be
prudent; 1b3) to have insight, have comprehension; 1b3a) insight,
comprehension (subst); 1b4) to cause to consider, give insight, teach;
1b4a) the teachers, the wise; 1b5) to act circ*mspectly, act prudently,
act wisely; 1b6) to prosper, have success; 1b7) to cause to prosper; #6,
#30, #300, #40, #70, #10 = Shim`iy (H8096): 1) a Benjamite, son of Gera
of the house of Saul in the time of David; 2) a Benjamite, son of Elah
and commissariat officer in the time of Solomon; 3) the Ramathite in
charge of the vineyards of David; 4) son of Gershon and grandson of
Levi; 5) a Levite, son of Jeduthun and chief of the 10th division of
singers in the time of David; 6) a Levite of the sons of Heman who took
part in the purification of the temple in the time of king Hezekiah of
Judah; 7) a Levite, brother of Cononiah in charge of receiving the
tithes and offerings in the reign of king Hezekiah of Judah; 8) a Levite
who had a foreign wife in the time of Ezra; 9) a Judaite, son of Pedaiah
and brother of Zerubbabel; 10) a Simeonite, son of Zacchur; 11) a
Reubenite, son of Gog and father of Micah; 12) one of the sons of Hashum
who had a foreign wife in the time of Ezra; 13) one of the sons of Bani
who had a foreign wife in the time of Ezra; 14) a Benjamite, son of
Kish, father of Jair, and grandfather of Mordecai in the time of Esther;
15) a Levite, son of Jahath, grandson of Gershon, and great grandson of
Levi; 16) Benjamite, father of Adaiah, Beraiah, and Shimrath. Spelled
'Shimhi'; #300, #50, #6, #50, #10, #40 = shanan (H8150): 1) to sharpen,
whet; 1a) (Qal) to whet, sharpen; 1b) (Piel) to sharpen, teach
(incisively); 1c) (Hithpolel) to be pierced; #6, #10, #300, #60, #80 =
shacaph (H8158): 1) (Piel) to hew in pieces, cut in pieces; 1a) meaning
dubious; #6, #300, #70, #80 = Sha`aph (H8174): 1) son of Jahdai of the
family of Caleb, the brother of Jerahmeel; 2) son of Caleb, the brother
of Jerahmeel, by his concubine Maachah and father of Madmannah; #6, #10,
#300, #80, #20, #40 = shaphak (H8210): 1) to pour, pour out, spill; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to pour, pour out; 1a2) to shed (blood); 1a3) to pour out
(anger or heart) (fig); 1b) (Niphal) to be poured out, be shed; 1c)
(Pual) to be poured out, be shed; 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to be poured out;
1d2) to pour out oneself; #5, #400, #1, #10, #40 = ta' (H8372): 1)
chamber, guardroom; #1, #50, #5, #300, #5, #10, #30, #5, #50 = anatello
(G393): 1) rise; 1a) to cause to rise; 1a1) of the earth bring forth
plants; 1b) to rise, arise, to rise from, be descended from; 1b1) of sun
moon and stars); #1, #50, #5, #400 = aneu (G427): 1) without one's will
or intervention; #5, #80, #10, #300, #10, #40, #10, #1 = epitimia
(G2009): 1) punishment; #5, #400, #1, #50 = Eua (G2096): 1) first woman
in the scriptures, mother of the human race; #40, #5, #100, #10, #40,
#50, #1, #10, #200 = merimna (G3308): 1) care, anxiety; #40, #5, #200,
#8, #40, #2, #100, #10, #1, #50 = mesembria (G3314): 1) as respects to
time: noon; 2) as respects to locality; 2a) the south; #50, #5, #1, #50,
#10, #200, #20, #70, #50 = neaniskos (G3495): 1) a young man, youth; 1a)
used of a young attendant or servant; #80, #1, #100, #9, #5, #50, #10,
#1, #200 = parthenia (G3932): 1) virginity; #80, #70, #10, #40, #5, #50,
#1, #200 = poimen (G4166): 1) a herdsman, esp. a shepherd; 2) metaph.;
1a) in the parable, he to whose care and control others have committed
themselves, and whose precepts they follow; 2a) the presiding officer,
manager, director, of any assembly: so of Christ the Head of the church;
2a1) of the overseers of the Christian assemblies; 2a2) of kings and
princes;
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #393 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #69} has 9 Categories:
#300, #10, #7, #70, #6 = zuwa` (H2111): 1) to tremble, quiver, quake, be
in terror; 1a) (Qal) to tremble, quake; 1b) (Pilpel); 1b1) to shake
violently; 1b2) to cause to tremble; #8, #80, #300, #5 = chuphshah
(H2668): 1) freedom; #8, #90, #90, #200, #5 = chatsotserah (H2689): 1)
trumpet, clarion; #10, #5, #6, #300, #2, #70 = Yehowsheba` (H3089): 1)
daughter of king Joram of Judah and wife of the high priest Jehoiada;
1a) alternate spelling 'Jehoshabeath' - 03090; #40, #300, #1, #2, #10,
#40 = mash'ab (H4857): 1) drawing place of water, place to draw water;
#5, #300, #8, #80 = shachaph (H7828): 1) a ceremonially unclean bird;
1a) cuckow, gull, seagull, sea-mew; 1b) maybe an extinct bird, exact
meaning unknown; #1, #20, #1, #9, #1, #100, #200, #10, #1, #50 =
akatharsia (G167): 1) uncleanness; 1a) physical; 1b) in a moral sense:
the impurity of lustful, luxurious, profligate living; 1b1) of impure
motives; #1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #8, #200 = harpage (G724): 1) the act of
plundering, robbery; 2) plunder spoil; #40, #5, #30, #10, #300, #8 =
Melite (G3194): 1) the name of an island in the Mediterranean, lying
between Africa and Sicily, now called Malta;
PLANE 9 (vCORAL): (#486) #57 - Laissez Faire Politics, Simplicity In
Habits / (#219) #70 - Difficulty in Knowing How, Obtuse
9 {*NONE* @ 1500 hours} / c² (25 as #65 - MARS / SOLDIER)
Nous:#19
Time:15:00 hrs
Date:2017.11.8
Torah:#10 #8 #6 %81 = #24
Dao:Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to Simplicity
Tetra:#58 - Gathering In
I-Ching:H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground, Calculations
Latin: Recordabilis {God who knows all things} Alt: Haziel {Seeing of God} {
1. PROTECTOR OF PRINCES, SERVES TO UNCOVER PLOTS & TRAITORS
2. IN UNDOING THEIR PLANS
3. JUST RULERS
4. Ouestucati
}
David {Well-beloved, dear}
@memeBrain [Telos: #33, Super: #33 - Achievable Goals, Virtue of
Discrimination; I-Ching: H9 - Lesser Domestication, Minor Restraint,
Small Accumulating, The taming power of the small, Small harvest; Tetra:
35 - Gathering,#66 - Strategic Reversal, Putting Oneself Behind;
I-Ching: H41 - Diminution, Decrease, Diminishing; Tetra: 55 - Diminishment]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #357 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #33} has 13 Categories: #6,
#1, #40, #200, #80, #30 = 'Amraphel (H569): 1) the king of Shinar
(Babylon) (perhaps Hammurabi c 2100 BC); #1, #50, #6, #300 = 'Enowsh
(H583): 1) son of Seth; #1, #300, #20, #6, #30 = 'Eshkol (H812): 1) an
area of Hebron, the valley of Eshcol; 2) an Amorite, the brother of
Mamre, dwelling in Hebron; #40, #3, #4, #10, #300 = gadiysh (H1430): 1)
heap, stack, pile; 2) tomb; #7, #200, #100, #10, #40 = zaraq (H2236): 1)
to scatter, sprinkle, toss, throw, scatter abundantly, strew; 1a) (Qal)
to scatter, sprinkle, toss; 1b) (Pual) to be sprinkled; #6, #10, #300,
#40, #1 = Yishma' (H3457): 1) a Judaite descended from Hur; #6, #5,
#200, #40, #6, #50, #10, #40 = rimmown (H7416): 1) pomegranate; 1a) as
tree; 1b) as fruit; 1c) as pomegranate shaped ornaments in temple; #30,
#300, #2, #20, #5 = sebakah (H7639): 1) network, lattice-work, net,
netting; 1a) lattice; 1b) net-ornament (on pillars); 1c) network, toils
(for catching animals); #6, #300, #50, #1 = shana (H8132): 1) to change,
alter; 1a) (Qal) to change; 1b) (Piel) to change, alter; 1c) (Pual) to
be changed; #2, #1, #100, #50, #1, #2, #1, #200 = Barnabas (G921): 1)
the surname of Joses or Joseph, a Levite, a native of Cyprus He was a
distinguished Christian teacher and companion and colleague of Paul.;
#2, #1, #100, #200, #1, #2, #1, #50 = Barsabas (G923): 1) the surname of
a certain Joseph (Acts 1:; 2) the surname of a certain Judas (Acts 15:;
22) ; 23) ; #9, #5, #70, #200, #5, #2, #5, #10, #1, #50 = theosebeia
(G2317): 1) reverence towards God's goodness; #20, #70, #30, #1, #20,
#5, #10, #1, #200 = kolakeia (G2850): 1) flattery, flattering discourse;
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #471 {#81, #81, #81, #81, #81, #66} has 18
Categories: #6, #1, #8, #10, #40, #6, #400 = 'Achiymowth (H287): 1) a
son of Elkanah, a Levite; #30, #1, #40, #400 = 'emeth (H571): 1)
firmness, faithfulness, truth; 2) in truth, truly; 1a) sureness,
reliability; 1b) stability, continuance; 1c) faithfulness, reliableness;
1d) truth; 1d1) as spoken; 1d2) of testimony and judgment; 1d3) of
divine instruction; 1d4) truth as a body of ethical or religious
knowledge; 1d5) true doctrine adv; #30, #40, #400, #1 = 'athah (Aramaic)
(H858): 1) to come, arrive; 2) used in the NT in the phrase 'maranatha'
- 'Lord come'; 1a) (P'al) to come; 1b) (Aphel) to bring; 1c) (Hophal) to
be brought; #6, #10, #400, #3, #50, #2 = ganab (H1589): 1) to steal,
steal away, carry away; 1a) (Qal) to steal; 1b) (Niphal) to be stolen;
1c) (Piel) to steal away; 1d) (Pual) to be stolen away, be brought by
stealth; 1e) (Hithpael) to go by stealth, steal away; #5, #10, #20, #30,
#6, #400 = heykal (H1964): 1) palace, temple, nave, sanctuary; 1a)
palace; 1b) temple (palace of God as king); 1c) hall, nave (of Ezekiel's
temple); 1d) temple (of heavenly temple); #20, #5, #40, #6, #400 = hamah
(H1993): 1) to murmur, growl, roar, cry aloud, mourn, rage, sound, make
noise, tumult, be clamorous, be disquieted, be loud, be moved, be
troubled, be in an uproar; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to growl; 1a2) to murmur
(fig. of a soul in prayer); 1a3) to roar; 1a4) to be in a stir, be in a
commotion; 1a5) to be boisterous, be turbulent; #10, #400, #5, #6, #50 =
yath (Aramaic) (H3487): 1) (mark of the direct object or the accusative
and not translated); #6, #40, #300, #70, #50, #5 = mish`enah (H4938): 1)
support (of every kind), staff; #10, #400, #50, #3, #8 = nagach (H5055):
1) to push, thrust, gore; 1a) (Qal) to gore; 1b) (Piel) to push or
thrust at; 1c) (Hithpael) to engage in thrusting, wage war; #50, #20,
#1, #400 = neko'th (H5219): 1) a spice; 1a) perhaps tragacanth gum; #60,
#6, #400, #5 = cuwth (H5497): 1) garment, vesture; #5, #60, #400, #6 =
cethav (H5638): 1) winter, rainy season; #5, #40, #80, #200, #6, #90,
#10, #40 = parats (H6555): 1) to break through or down or over, burst,
breach; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to break or burst out (from womb or enclosure);
1a2) to break through or down, make a breach in; 1a3) to break into;
1a4) to break open; 1a5) to break up, break in pieces; 1a6) to break out
(violently) upon; 1a7) to break over (limits), increase; 1a8) to use
violence; 1a9) to burst open; 1a10) to spread, distribute; 1b) (Niphal)
to be broken through; 1c) (Pual) to be broken down; 1d) (Hithpael) to
break away; #1, #50, #5, #10, #30, #5, #300, #70 = anaireo (G337): 1) to
take up, to lift up (from the ground); 2) to take away, abolish; 1a) to
take up for myself as mine; 1b) to own (an exposed infant); 2a) to do
away with or abrogate customs or ordinances; 2b) to put out of the way,
kill slay a man; #20, #1, #100, #80, #70, #200 = karpos (G2590): 1)
fruit; 2) that which originates or comes from something, an effect,
result; 1a) the fruit of the trees, vines, of the fields; 1b) the fruit
of one's loins, ie. his progeny, his posterity; 2a) work, act, deed; 2b)
advantage, profit, utility; 2c) praises, which are presented to God as a
thank offering; 2d) to gather fruit (ie. a reaped harvest) into life
eternal (as into a granary), is used in fig. discourse of those who by
their labours have fitted souls to obtain eternal life; #20, #30, #10,
#200, #10, #1, #200 = klisia (G2828): 1) a hut erected to pass the night
in; 2) a tent; 3) anything to recline on; 4) a company reclining; 3a) a
chair in which to lean back the head; 3b) a reclining chair; 4a) a row
or party of persons reclining at meal; #70, #200, #1, #200 = hosos
(G3745): 1) as great as, as far as, how much, how many, whoever; #70,
#400, #1 = oua (G3758): 1) ah! ha! an interjection of wonder and amazement;
Under the formalist theory of contract, every contract must have six
elements:
*MANIFEST* *NARRATIVE*:
PLANE 1 (vBRONZE): (#26) #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity /
(#26) #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity
*OFFER*: @memeBrain [Telos: #67, Super: #67 - Three Treasures; I-Ching:
H10 - Treading (conduct), Tread Carefully, Continuing; Tetra: 48 -
Ritual, Ego: #67 - Three Treasures; I-Ching: H10 - Treading (conduct),
Tread Carefully, Continuing; Tetra: 48 - Ritual]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #67 has 19 Categories: #1, #2, #10, #4, #50 =
'Abiydan (H27): 1) a prince (ruler) of Benjamin; #30, #1, #8, #7, #10,
#5, #6 = 'Achazyah (H274): 1) ruler of Israel, son of Ahab; 2) ruler of
Judah, son of Jehoram (Joram); #6, #40, #1, #10, #10 = 'iy (H339): 1)
coast, island, shore, region; #6, #20, #1, #10, #30 = 'ayal (H354): 1)
stag, deer, hart; #6, #2, #9, #50 = Beten (H991): 1) a city in Asher;
#1, #6, #50, #10 = Ben-'Owniy (H1126): 1) the name given to Benjamin by
Rachel; #3, #4, #6, #4, #10, #40 = geduwd (H1416): 1) a band, troop,
marauding band; 1a) marauding band, raiding band; 1b) troop, band (of
divisions of army); 1c) foray, raid; #3, #4, #10, #10, #40 = gediy
(H1423): 1) kid, young male goat; #6, #6, #10, #5, #40 = vav (H2053): 1)
hook, peg, nail, pin; #7, #50, #10 = zan (Aramaic) (H2178): 1) kind,
sort; #30, #10, #5, #6, #1, #8, #7 = Yehow'achaz (H3059): 1) a king of
Judah and son of Josiah; 2) a king of the northern kingdom of Israel and
son of Jehu; 3) a king of Judah and son of Jehoram (Ahaziah); #40, #1,
#6, #10, #10 = ma'avay (H3970): 1) desire; #6, #40, #10, #9, #2 = meytab
(H4315): 1) the best; 1a) as superlative; #50, #2, #8, #7 = Nibchaz
(H5026): 1) a deity of the Avites introduced by them into Samaria in the
time of Shalmaneser; idol had the figure of a dog; #60, #2, #5 = cibbah
(H5438): 1) turn of events, turn of affairs; #60, #3, #4 = cegid
(Aramaic) (H5457): 1) to prostrate oneself, do homage, worship; 1a)
(P'al) to do homage; #60, #6, #1 = Cow' (H5471): 1) a king of Egypt
(perhaps only the vizier of the king); #1, #3, #5, #50, #8 = agenes
(G36): 1) ignoble, coward, mean, base, of no family, that is: low born;
#1, #10, #50, #5, #1 = Aineas (G132): 1) the name of a paralytic cured
by Peter at Lydia;
PLANE 2 (vPURPLE): (#71) #45 - Extremes and Reversals, Greatest Virtue
/ (#45) #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to Simplicity
*ACCEPTANCE*: @memeBrain [Super: #11 - Value and Function of
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding
together, Alliance; Tetra: 33 - Closeness, Ego: #25 - What's behind it
all?, Imaging the Mysterious; I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small
Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing;
Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness, Distortion]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #71 has 26 Categories: #6, #1, #4, #10, #50 = 'edayin
(Aramaic) (H116): 1) then, afterwards, thereupon, from that time; #1,
#4, #6, #50, #10 = 'Adonay (H136): 1) my lord, lord; 2) Lord - title,
spoken in place of Yahweh in Jewish display of reverence; 1a) of men;
1b) of God; #6, #2, #1, #6, #50, #6 = 'own (H202): 1) vigour, generative
power; 2) wealth; 3) physical strength (of men and behemoth); #5, #1,
#20, #10, #30, #5 = 'akiylah (H396): 1) food, a meal, an eating, meat;
#1, #20, #50 = 'aken (H403): 1) surely, truly, indeed; 1a) truly, indeed
(strong assertive force); 1b) but indeed, but in fact (emphasizing a
contrast); #1, #30, #30, #10 = 'alelay (H480): 1) woe! alas!; #1, #30,
#40 = 'illem (H483): 1) mute, silent, dumb, unable to speak; #1, #50,
#20 = 'anak (H594): 1) plummet, plumb, lead-weight; #6, #2, #3, #30, #30
= galal (H1558): 1) on account of, for the sake of; #3, #50, #7, #10, #1
= genaz (Aramaic) (H1596): 1) treasure; #6, #4, #10, #50, #1 = diyn
(Aramaic) (H1780): 1) judgment; #2, #4, #10, #50, #5 = Diynah (H1783):
1) daughter of Jacob by Leah, full sister of Simeon and Levi; #6, #5,
#10, #50 = hiyn (H1969): 1) hin; 1a) a unit of measure, about 5 quarts
(6 l); 1b) a vessel holding a hin of liquid; #6, #50, #10, #5 = Vanyah
(H2057): 1) one of the sons of Bani, in the time of Ezra, who took a
foreign wife; #6, #10, #3, #2, #10, #40 = yageb (H3010): 1) field,
ploughed field; #10, #5, #6, #20, #30 = Yehuwkal (H3081): 1) a son of
Shelemiah and a servant of king Zedekiah whom he sent to Jeremiah to
entreat his prayers and advice; #5, #10, #6, #50 = yaven (H3121): 1)
mire, mirer; #6, #10, #20, #30, #5 = yekel (Aramaic) (H3202): 1) to be
able; 1a) (P'al); 1a1) to be able; 1a2) to prevail; #30, #40, #1 = ma'
(Aramaic) (H3964): 1) what, whatever; 1a) what?; 1b) whatever, what,
whatsoever; 1c) how?, why?, wherefore? (with prefixes); #2, #40, #4,
#20, #5 = medokah (H4085): 1) mortar; #6, #40, #6, #2, #1, #10, #6 =
mowba' (H4126): 1) entrance, entering, in-coming; #6, #40, #7, #10, #8 =
maziyach (H4206): 1) girdle; #20, #40, #8, #2, #1 = machabe' (H4224): 1)
hiding place; 2) (TWOT) bosom; #40, #10, #20, #1 = Miyka' (H4316): 1)
son of Mephibosheth; 2) a Levite who signed the covenant with Nehemiah;
3) father of Mattaniah, a Gershonite Levite and descendant of Asaph; #5,
#30, #30, #1, #4, #1 = Hellas (G1671): 1) a country in southern Europe;
#20, #1, #50 = kan (G2579): 1) and if; 2) also or even if; 2a) of only,
at least; 2b) even if;
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #45 has 7 Categories: #2, #2, #30, #10, #1 = Babliy
(Aramaic) (H896): 1) Babylonian; #30, #2, #6, #7 = buwz (H937): 1)
contempt; 1a) springing from evil; 1b) springing from prosperity; 1c)
springing from judgment; #2, #30, #3, #10 = Bilgay (H1084): 1) a priest
who covenanted with Nehemiah; #6, #7, #2, #30 = Zebul (H2083): 1) chief
man of the city of Shechem at the time of the contest between Abimelech
and the native Canaanites; #6, #30, #2, #2, #5 = lebab (Aramaic)
(H3825): 1) heart, mind; #6, #30, #9 = lot (H3910): 1) myrrh; 1a) an
aromatic gum exuded by the leaves of the rock rose; #2, #5, #30, #8 =
belos (G956): 1) a missile, dart, javelin, arrow;
PLANE 3 (vRED): (#131) #60 - Skill Rulership, Maintain One's Place /
(#60) #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of Virtue
*CONSIDERATION*: @memeBrain [Telos: #67, Super: #67 - Three Treasures;
I-Ching: H10 - Treading (conduct), Tread Carefully, Continuing; Tetra:
48 - Ritual, Ego: #56 - Abstruse Mysterious Virtuosity; I-Ching: H55 -
Abundance, Abounding, Fullness; Tetra: 46 - Enlargement]
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #56 has 16 Categories: #10, #1, #5, #10, #30 = 'ahal
(H166): 1) (Hiphil) to be clear, shine; #1, #8, #7, #40 = 'Achuzzam
(H275): 1) a descendant of Judah through Caleb; #30, #2, #4, #20 = badad
(H910): 1) isolation, withdrawal, separation; 2) alone; 1a) an isolated
city adv; 2a) security (fig.); #2, #4, #50 = Bedan (H917): 1) a judge
who followed Gideon; 2) a Manassite; #6, #40, #3, #7 = gez (H1488): 1) a
shearing, mowing; 1a) shearing, that sheared off; 1b) a mowing, mown
grass; #3, #40, #7, #6 = Gimzow (H1579): 1) a town in Judah south of the
road between Jerusalem and Joppa which with its dependant villages was
captured by the Philistines in the reign of Ahaz; #30, #5, #6, #4, #6,
#5 = Howdevah (H1937): 1) the head of a Levitical family returning from
Exile in the time of Nehemiah; #5, #6, #5, #40 = Howham (H1944): 1) king
of Hebron at the time of the conquest of Canaan; #6, #10, #4, #1, #30,
#5 = Yidalah (H3030): 1) a town in Zebulun between Shimron and
Bethlehem, site unknown; #6, #5, #30, #9, #1, #5 = leta'ah (H3911): 1) a
kind of lizard; 1a) named as being unclean; 1b) perhaps an extinct
animal, exact meaning is unknown; #40, #2, #9, #5 = mabbat (H4007): 1)
expectation, object of hope or confidence; #40, #4, #5, #2, #5 =
madhebah (H4062): 1) boisterous, raging, behaviour, boisterous
behaviour; 2) (CLBL) golden city, exactness of gold; #2, #40, #4, #10 =
Maday (Aramaic) (H4076): 1) an inhabitant of Media; 2) the territory
inhabited by the Medes; 2a) located northwest of Persia proper, south
and southwest of the Caspian Sea, east of Armenia and Assyria, and west
and northwest of the great salt desert of Iram; #50, #4, #2 =
`Ammiynadab (H5992): 1) son of Ram or Aram and father of Nahshon or
Naasson and an ancestor of Jesus; father-in-law of Aaron; 2) a Kohathite
Levite and chief of the sons of Uzziel; 3) a Levite, son of Kohath; also
'Izhar'; #20, #1, #20, #5, #10 = kakei (G2546): 1) and there; 2) there
also; #40, #8, #3, #5 = me (G3361): 1) no, not lest;
PLANE 4 (vBLUE): (#193) #62 - Construing a Guide, Practise Reason /
(#62) #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture
*MEETING* *OF* *MINDS*: @memeBrain [Telos: #1, Super: #1 - To Guide with
Names, Reason's Realisation; I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 -
Joy, Ego: #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of Virtue;
I-Ching: H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning; Tetra: 1 -
Centre]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #1 has 1 Categories: #1 = hos (G3739): 1) who, which,
what, that;
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #15 has 5 Categories: #2, #1, #2, #10 = 'eb (H3): 1)
freshness, fresh green, green shoots, or greenery; #2, #6, #7 = Buwz
(H938): 1) second son of Nahor {hoarse; dry; hot}, Abraham's {father of
a great multitude} nephew; 2) a Gadite {a band; a troop}; #3, #2, #10 =
Gabbay (H1373): 1) the head of an important Benjamite {son of the right
hand} family living in Jerusalem in the time of Nehemiah {consolation;
repentance of the Lord}; #5, #4, #1, #5 = da'ah (H1676): 1) fast-flying
bird of prey (kite?), bird of prey; #4, #10, #1 = dia (G1223): 1)
through; 2) through; 1a) of place; 1a1) with; 1a2) in; 1b) of time; 1b1)
throughout; 1b2) during; 1c) of means; 1c1) by; 1c2) by the means of;
2a) the ground or reason by which something is or is not done; 2a1) by
reason of; 2a2) on account of; 2a3) because of for this reason; 2a4)
therefore; 2a5) on this account;
PLANE 5 (vORANGE): (#269) #76 - Strength's Warning Signs, Revealers of
Virtue / (#76) #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics)
*CAPACITY*: @memeBrain [Telos: #45, Super: #45 - Extremes and Reversals,
Greatest Virtue; I-Ching: H49 - Radical Change, Revolution (moulting),
Skinning, The bridle; Tetra: 28 - Change, Ego: Ego: #44 - Moderate
Values, Setting Up Precepts; I-Ching: H1 - Pure Yang, Creative
Principle/Heaven, Force, Strong action, The key, God; Tetra: 36 - Strength]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #45 has 7 Categories: #2, #2, #30, #10, #1 = Babliy
(Aramaic) (H896): 1) Babylonian; #30, #2, #6, #7 = buwz (H937): 1)
contempt; 1a) springing from evil; 1b) springing from prosperity; 1c)
springing from judgment; #2, #30, #3, #10 = Bilgay (H1084): 1) a priest
who covenanted with Nehemiah; #6, #7, #2, #30 = Zebul (H2083): 1) chief
man of the city of Shechem at the time of the contest between Abimelech
and the native Canaanites; #6, #30, #2, #2, #5 = lebab (Aramaic)
(H3825): 1) heart, mind; #6, #30, #9 = lot (H3910): 1) myrrh; 1a) an
aromatic gum exuded by the leaves of the rock rose; #2, #5, #30, #8 =
belos (G956): 1) a missile, dart, javelin, arrow;
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #44 has 13 Categories: #1, #2, #10, #1, #30 =
'Abiy'el (H22): 1) Saul's grandfather; #1, #3, #30, #10 = 'egel (H96):
1) drop, reserve supply, collections, stores; #6, #1, #4, #2, #1, #30 =
'Adbe'el (H110): 1) third son of Ishmael and grandson of Abraham; #6,
#1, #6, #1, #30 = 'Uw'el (H177): 1) a Judean who had taken a foreign
woman during the exile; #1, #6, #7, #30 = 'Uwzal (H187): 1) sixth son
Joktan; #1, #7, #30, #6 = 'azal (Aramaic) (H236): 1) to go, to go off;
1a) (P'al) to go, go off; #1, #30, #7, #2, #4 = 'Elzabad (H443): 1) a
Gadite warrior who aided David; 2) a Korhite Levite; #30, #2, #7, #5 =
bizzah (H961): 1) spoil, booty; #3, #1, #30, #10 = go'el (H1352): 1)
defilement, defiling; #8, #30, #1, #5 = Chel'ah (H2458): 1) one of the
two wives of Ashur, father of Tekoah; #6, #30, #5, #3 = lahag (H3854):
1) study, studying, devotion to study; #30, #5, #9 = lahat (H3858): 1)
flame (of an angelic sword); #1, #4, #8, #30, #1 = adelos (G82): 1) not
manifest, indistinct, uncertain, obscure;
PLANE 6 (vGREEN): (#302) #33 - Achievable Goals, Virtue of
Discrimination / (#114) #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse
*LEGALITY*: @memeBrain [Telos: #10, Super: #10 - Impossible Advice, What
can Be Done?; I-Ching: H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to
Brightness/Fire, The net; Tetra: 41 - Response, Ego: #46 - Guiding
Contentment, Moderation of Desire; I-Ching: H1 - Pure Yang, Creative
Principle/Heaven, Force, Strong action, The key, God; Tetra: 37 - Purity]]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #10 has 3 Categories: #2, #4, #4 = Bedad (H911): 1)
the father of an Edomite {red, earthy; of blood} chief; #5, #5 = hahh
(H1929): 1) alas!; #7, #3 = zag (H2085): 1) (meaning uncertain); 1a)
name of some insignificant product of the vine, forbidden to Nazarites
{one chosen or set apart}, perhaps the stem or skin of the grape;
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #46 has 9 Categories: #1, #4, #30, #10, #1 = 'Adalya'
(H118): 1) fifth son of Haman, executed at same time; #30, #1, #8, #7 =
'Achaz (H271): 1) king of Judah, son Jotham, father of Hezekiah; 2) a
Benjamite, son of Micah, and great grandson of Jonathan; #6, #1, #20,
#7, #10, #2 = 'Akziyb (H392): 1) a town in the lowland of west Judah; 2)
a town in Asher by the Sea of Galilee; #6, #2, #30, #4, #4 = Bildad
(H1085): 1) the second friend of Job; #40, #3, #2, #1 = gebe (H1360): 1)
cistern, pool; 1a) cistern; 1b) pool, marsh; #6, #3, #7, #30 = gezel
(H1499): 1) *robbery*, *plunder*; #6, #10, #8, #7, #10, #5 = Yachzeyah
(H3167): 1) son of Tikvah, apparently a priest and leader during the
time of Ezra; #6, #30, #6, #4 = Luwd (H3865): 1) the 4th listed son of
Shem and supposed progenitor of the Lydians n patr; 2) descendants of
Lud the son of Shem who settled in northern Africa; #1, #4, #1, #40 =
Adam (G76): 1) Adam, the first man, the parent of the whole human race;
Many other contracts, but not all types of contracts, also must be in
writing and be signed by the responsible party, in an element called
form. The 'forma corporis' as the form of the body are ideas of contract
historically associated [Luke 1:5-13] with Jewish / Christian notions of
the Christian passion and the metaphysical agreement of governance by an
emanated progression of magic squares that was made between sovereign
states, as perhaps a methodology in vogue at the time of the adoption of
the Julian Calendar.
----------
This is an articulation of immutable evidence, as the substantial basis
for my lawful and dignified claim as a public proclamation to a
prerogative as declared a Sovereign Authority over the Commonwealth of
Australia, which in the absence of any gainsay, depreciation, rancour
and redundancy has sought by judicious, prudent and diligent means, the
pursuit of virtue as a precious stone amongst the plethora of pleonasm,
an opportunity to invalidate by superseding, the original
instrumentation known as the Letters Patent to the said Federation of
the Commonwealth of Australia of 1901.
The Sovereign Authority which was bequeathed by Queen Victoria through
the LETTERS PATENT on 29 October 1900 and granted according to the good
word of God as Divine Graciousness, in the bestowal of a "HEAVENLY
(EPOURANIOS) GIFT (DŌREA)" which conveys all the necessary "POWERS
(DUNAMIS) of the WORLD (AIŌN)" [Ephesians 3:1-21 (KV); Hebrews 6:4-12
(KJV)] as expressing the totality of the AUTONOMY OF WILL being the
MATERIA PRIMA to the "Sovereign and Autonomous Right", the "Power to
Rule" and "Dispense Justice" by "Edict as a Divine Authority" being
PRINCIPLES OF THE SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY which can be understood in our
knowledge of God (GODHEAD/Divine Nature as Mind), and having thereby,
invalidated those Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth
of Australia of 1901, as to be then declared, apparent and permitted the
status as authority, powers and privilege accorded to the Sovereign of
the Commonwealth of Australia.
To have also provided, the metempirical (ie. the branch of philosophy
that deals with things existing beyond the realm of experience)
philosophical as the perennialist school of thought and metaphysical
(ie. of things transcending what is physical or natural and the temporal
reality) as Torah Kabbalistic thought interpretation given to an
alternative and tetragrammaton hom*oIOTIC perspective of the THEORY OF
NUMBER and its circ*mscribing as the DECALOGUE which is otherwise known
as the TEN COMMANDMENTS, by a declaration made and comprehensible to
ALL, as for ETERNITY and EXISTENT to an egalitarian, immutable and a
transcendent right of the State of Israel's claim to a Sovereign
AUTONOMY OF WILL, which is made in deference to it's subordinate
historical basal and terrestrial connubial (ie. marriage as a yoke)
ethos as a societal cultivation made upon it's 'self-identity as a
formula of autonomy' and as a vassal perspective of the Pythagorean
binomial as Roman Empire Governance which pervaded and was later adopted
by Islam, the Vatican City/State and German Fascism.
THAT I AM CLAIMING THE LEGAL PRINCIPLE OF *ACCESSIO* WHICH APPLIES THEN
TO THE SUPERFICIES AS AN ENTITLEMENT TO THIS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WHICH
IS DISTINCT AND SUPERCEDES THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CLAIM TO AN INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY BY A nomenclature conforms ONLY to the Pythagorean: c² (25 as
#65 - MARS) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN) + b² (16 as #34 - JUPITER)
Binominal nomenclature as TETRAD (36 as #111 - SOL INVICTUS).
THE LEGAL PRINCIPLE OF *ACCESSIO* WHICH APPLIES THEN TO THE SUPERFICIES
AS AN INTELLECTUAL CLAIM MADE OF THE PYTHAGOREAN BODY AND SOUL AS
INTELLECTUAL TETRAD BEING THEN THE BASIS FOR NATURE AS EXHIBITED BY THE
TOTALITY AS TETRACYTS:
As a #CENTRE AS POINT (YOD = #10) is 1 - *MONAD*, a LINE (radius = 1 -
*MONAD*) is 2 - *DUAD*, a SUPERFICIES (22 / 7 = rational PI being 3W1D
as bifurcated TRIAD microcosm (3-6-9 as Judaeo-Christian custom
associated with the Jerusalem Temple prayer times conveyed within [Acts
10:1-48]) and the logical premise of a SEPTET macrocosm (the inner
TELOS: .142857...) is 3 - *TRIAD*, the solid property then agrees with
the *TETRAD*.
According to Wikipedia, *ACCESSIO* is a legal concept derived from
Ancient Roman property law that decided ownership of an object or work
that is somehow related to another object or work; one thing is
considered the principal, and the other is considered to be an
*ACCESSION* or addition to it. In general the owner of the principal
thing, whichever it is, became the owner of the *ACCESSION* also.
*ACCESSIO* was not a specific rule of law such as "superficies solo
cedit" which could also be reasonably associated to Intellectual
Property matters, instead it was a principle with a number of special
cases that had their own particular guidelines for determination of
ownership.
The person who lost their property by *ACCESSIO* had as a general rule a
right to be indemnified for their loss by the person who acquired the
new property. The exceptions were cases of mala fides as bad faith which
is in this instance, the holding of beliefs in their minds even though
they are directly contradicted by facts. These are beliefs held in bad
faith double mindedness or double heartedness in duplicity, fraud, or
deception. It may involve intentional deceit of others, or self-deception.
The most undisputed kind of *ACCESSIO* arises from the union of a thing
with the ground (ie.
In English, Natural Law is a term is frequently employed as equivalent
to the laws of nature, meaning the order which governs the activities of
the material universe:
1) the logical grounding of infinity on the Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756
2) the subjective grounding of infinity on Septet #41 centric on 13-17
September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762 as 6,000 = 122J3W1D +
9(9²+1)/2 as #369
3) the association of this to further expression as a natural, common
law and an egalitarian as sovereign right to circ*mscribing of human
nature attributed by an Autonomy of Will, rationality, reason and as
consciousness given by an interpretation of the 10 Commandments as the
basis for the Torah.
); and when the union between the ground and the thing is complete, the
thing belongs to whoever owns the ground.
It is possible, to then view the 10 Commandments as compliant with the
Pythagorean *TETRAD* interpretation but as a logical syllogism (as a
*TRIAD* microcosm + 4th as the Sabbath commandment restatement)
conveying a Natural and Common declaration of an egalitarian right which
declares Israel's sovereignty in terms of an unfaltering cosmogonic
basis, but not in terms of either the Roman Empire basis of Governance
(ie. the Julian calendar) or the hybridization of the Chinese Empire
basis of Governance made possible by a cosmological consideration of
there being a Grand Inception on a new moon upon a midnight of 21st
December 103 BCE.
As the relativity and grounding of the Infinite to the temporal reality
(ie. the phenomenology as the deterministic unfolding of history) which
is implied by the notion of rational PI and the cosmogonical Genesis
reprise of the lunar / solar cycle occurring on the equinox of Wednesday
20th March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday 21st March 1996.
As a sophistic opinion perpetuating a HETEROS MARRIAGE ethic through a
mechanical and merciless CANON OF TRANSPOSITION by a pantomimed
contrivance of reality as a faux superiority in a claim of wisdom
comprising the eight elements as only a logical fallacy encapsulation
made of a hybridisation to the DAOist PARADIGM perspective which had
it's Grand Inception at midnight on the new moon of solstice as 21
December 103 BCE to this present day, as the hom*o[IOS] SAPIEN[T] natural
and harmonious equivalent to the COURSE-trochos of NATURE-genesis.
[James 3:6]
Which occurred within King Herod's temple at Jerusalem until it was
raised by Roman military incursion to quell a Jewish revolt within 69
CE, when Vespasian {born in the evening; resembling a wasp} laid siege
to Jerusalem {vision of peace} as the Emperor of Rome and who was the
founder of the Flavian dynasty which consolidated Roman rule in Germany
and Britain and reformed the army and brought prosperity to the empire;
the city of Jerusalem was then captured the following year by his son
Titus {pleasing}.
As encapsulated knowledge, it concerns a perspective of the
SOVEREIGN/MARRIAGE and the supposed peace dynamic as the microcosm being
expressed by a Natural / Common law syllogism and an egalitarian
SOVEREIGN AUTONOMOUS RIGHT aligned to time and associated with a
rational conception of PI (3W1D as ipso facto: 7 x 24 x 13 x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2423 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / New Moon Thursday 21 March 1996) as then distinctly, a
different septet macrocosm perspective of the decalogue as a
circ*mscribing of consciousness being fundamental to existence
articulated by the hom*oIOS THEORY OF NUMBER:
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indMGV4Qks3RmctVVU
I HAVE REPORTING THESE MATTERS OF GREAT GRAVITAS TO THE VICTORIA POLICE
ON 19 MARCH 2017, ABOUT THE DIABOLICAL CIRc*msTANCE WHEREBY RELIGIOUS
PIETY IS MASQUERADING AS PANTOMIMED BELLIGERENT IMPERTINENCE *ALLEGEDLY*
*A* *TRAITOROUS* *CONDUCT* *SEEKING* *TO* *IMPOSE* *A* *SUBSTITUTED*
*VIRTUE* *UPON* *OUR* *ANZAC* *TRADITION* *AND* *PERVERT* *STATE*
*AUTHORITY* *AND* *SOVEREIGNTY* *OF* *THE* *COMMONWEALTH*, WHEN
ESPECIALLY GIVEN SUCH CONDUCT HAS BLASPHEMED THE NAME OF YHWH AS GOD
ALMIGHTY.
MONAD - #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE: {ALEPH (*MOTHER* - SCALES OF MERIT)
/ SERAPHIM (Heb. Saraph Gk. Ophis - burning, that is, (figuratively)
poisonous (serpent); specifically a fiery (serpent) or symbolical
creature (from their copper color))} {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: {1 + 2 + 3 +
4 = 10}}
According, I have derived an alternative perspective of the *JEWISH*
*CHRONOLOGICAL* / *MATHEMATICAL* *VIEW* *OF* *NATURAL* / *COMMON* *AND*
*UNIVERSAL* *LAW* *AS* *SYLLOGISTIC* MICROCOSM being constituted by the
three higher numbers of the Decade and which stand for the invisible and
metempirical philosophical and metaphysical theology as the Torah's
which is an Intellectual Property to an AUTONOMY OF WILL conveying the
claim of Natural and Common Law as the Universal basis to an
egalitarian right derived from a legitimate cosmogonic perspective
establishing the existence of a sovereign autonomous right to govern
which is expressed lawfully by a logical syllogism by the first three
ordinance statements of the 10 Commandments.
In English, Natural Law is a term is frequently employed as equivalent
to the laws of nature, meaning the order which governs the activities of
the material universe:
- PURPLE FORBIDDEN ENCLOSURE (紫微垣) / MONAD - #1 - NATURE CONTAINS
NATURE: {ALEPH (#1) / (*MOTHER* - SCALES OF MERIT): SERAPHIM (Heb.
Saraph Gk. Ophis - burning, that is, (figuratively) poisonous (serpent);
specifically a fiery (serpent) or symbolical creature (from their copper
color))} {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA {1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 10}
Northern Pole (北極 - Běijí)
Four Advisors (四輔 - Sìfǔ)
Right Wall (紫微左垣 - Zǐwēiyòuyuán)
Chief Judge (大理 - Dàlǐ)
Six Jia (六甲 - Liùjiá)
Canopy Support (杠 - Gāng)
Guest House (傳舍 - Chuánshě)
Eight Kinds of Crops (八穀 - Bāgǔ)
Celestial Boat (天船 - Tiānchuán) and the Stomach (胃宿 as Wèi Xiù -
Stomach, fingers and granary/Aries) is one of the twenty-eight mansions
of the Chinese constellations and was associated with White Tiger of the
West (西方白虎).
22/7 as 3W1D ...
THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of*
*priests* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated
to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day
intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days
"And God spake all these words, saying, 'I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {that troubles or oppresses;
anguish}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]
And whereas We did on the 17th day of September, 1900, by and with the
advice of Our Privy Council declare by proclamation that, on and after
the 1st day of January, 1901, the people of New South Wales, Victoria,
South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania and also Western Australia,
should be united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia: And whereas by
the said recited Act certain *POWERS*, *FUNCTIONS*, *and* *AUTHORITIES*
*were* *declared* to be vested in the Governor General: And whereas We
are *desirous* *of* *making* *effectual* *and* *permanent* *provision*
for the office of Governor General and Commander in chief in and over
Our said Commonwealth of Australia, without making new Letters Patent on
each demise of the said office. *Now* *know* *ye* *that* *We* *have*
*thought* *fit* *to* *constitute*, *ORDER*, *and* *DECLARE*, *and* *do*
*by* *these* *PRESENTS* *CONSTITUTE* *ORDER*, *and* *DECLARE*, that
there shall be a Governor General and *Commander* *in* *Chief*
(hereinafter called the Governor General) in and over Our Commonwealth
of Australia (hereinafter called Our said Commonwealth), and that the
person who shall fill the said office of *Governor* *General* *shall*
*be* *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME* *APPOINTED* by Commission under Our Sign
Manual and Signet.
It was said that the white tiger (western mansions) would only appear
when the emperor ruled with absolute virtue, or if there was peace
throughout the world)
- SUPREME PALACE ENCLOSURE (太微垣) / DUAD - #13 - *NATURE* *CONTAINS*
*NATURE*: {MEM (#40) / *MOTHER* - *THE* *TONGUE* *OF* *DECREE*
*DECIDING* *BETWEEN* *THEM*: 10 paragraphs of the Letters Patent of the
Australian Constitution 1 January 1901}
THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
AS BEING A LOGICAL GROUNDING OF INFINITY;
"... Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the
LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon
the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my
commandments..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]
I - And *we* *do* *hereby* *authorize* *and* *command* *Our* *said*
*Governor* *General* *to* *do* *and* *execute*, *in* *due* *manner*,
*all* *things* *that* *shall* *belong* *to* *his* *said* *command*,
*and* *to* *the* *trust* *We* *have* *reposed* *in* *him*, *according*
*to* *the* *several* *POWER* and *AUTHORITIES* *granted* *or*
*APPOINTED* *him* *by* *VIRTUE* of 'The Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution Act, 1900', *and* *of* *these* *present* *Letters* *Patent*
and of such Commission as may be issued to him under Our Sign Manual and
Signet, or by Order in Our Privy Council, or by Us through one of Our
Principal Secretaries of State, and to such laws as shall hereafter be
in *FORCE* in Our said Commonwealth.
- HEAVENLY MARKET ENCLOSURE (天市垣) / TRIAD - #21 - *AUTONOMOUS* *NATURE*:
{SHIN (#300) / *MOTHER* - *SCALES* *OF* *LIABILITY*: bequeathed in
perpetuity to its sovereign descendants)
THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.
AS BEING A SUBJECTIVE GROUNDING OF INFINITY AS ETERNITY.
"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the
LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus
20:7 (KJV)]
IX - And We do hereby *reserve* *to* *Ourselves* *Our* *heirs* *and*
*SUCCESSORS*, *FULL* *POWER* *AND* *AUTHORITY* *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*
*TO* *REVOKE*, *ALTER*, *OR* *AMEND* *these* *Our* *Letters* *Patent*,
*as* *to* Us or *THEM* *SHALL* *SEEM* *MEET*.
CHANGE TO:
IX - And we do hereby reserve to the Lieutenant Governor as Speaker of
the Council, together in a Council comprising 8 Senate Ministers, 8
House of Representative Ministers and 8 Judicial members, from each
State appointed by the Governor General, who are given full power and
authority from time to time to revoke, alter, or amend these our Letters
Patent, as to us or them shall seem meet.
THE LAWS OF NATURE: THE THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS
The phrase 'law of nature' appears to have begun to be used
systematically during the early eighteenth century. It is generally
agreed that the phrase reflects the widely-held notion, prevalent within
both orthodox Christianity and Deism, that the world was ordered by a
divine law-giver, who laid down the manner in which the creation should
behave. A 'law of nature' was thus held to be more than a descriptive
or summary of observation features of the world; it reflected a divine
decision that the world was intended to behave in this manner. With the
widespread secularisation of western culture, this general belief has
been eroded, both inside and outside the scientific community. The
phrase 'laws of nature' remained, nevertheless, although it has acquired
something of the status of a dead metaphor. It remains, however, a
concept with profound theological implication.
The Book of Jubilees was found amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls and was
otherwise translated in 1917 by R. H. Charles and published on behalf of
the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge within London. It
suggests that the giving of the Law at Sinai was a milestone and clearly
dependent upon the earlier religious aspirations as conveyed by the Book
of Enoch, as being related to nomenclature and the representation of
structured time by cosmological principles as understood within nature
and were articulated by meta-descriptor prototypes for all occurrence of
time: "And the angel of the presence, who went before the camp of Israel
[Exodus 14:19], took the TABLETS OF THE DIVISION OF YEARS FROM THE TIME
OF CREATION OF THE LAW AND TESTIMONY ACCORDING TO THEIR WEEKS (OF
YEARS), ACCORDING TO THE JUBILEES, year by year throughout the full
number of Jubilees, from the DAY OF CREATION UNTIL THE DAY OF THE NEW
CREATION WHEN THE HEAVEN AND EARTH AND ALL OF THEIR CREATURES SHALL BE
RENEWED ACCORDING TO THE POWERS OF HEAVEN AND ACCORDING TO THE WHOLE
NATURE OF EARTH, until the sanctuary of the LORD is created in Jerusalem
upon Mount Zion.
And all of the lights will be renewed for healing and peace and
*BLESSING* for all of the elect of Israel and in order that it might be
thus from that day and unto all the days of the earth." [Book of
Jubilees 1:29]
We may being by attempting to clarify what a 'law of nature' might be.
The term is used widely, and consequently with a degree of imprecision,
not least on account of the variety of nuanced meanings associated with
the word 'law'. It can be used to refer to universally true statements
of non-limited scope that embody only qualitative predicates. Examples
of this might include 'all metals conduct electricity' or 'at constant
pressure any gas expands with increasing temperature.' This approach to
a definition excludes what might be termed 'accidental laws,' such as
'all the animals in my garden the afternoon are cats,' or "vacuously
true generalizations," such as "all solid gold spheres are less than ten
meters in diameter," or "all unicorns weigh five kilograms" (Ayers 1956;
Carroll 1990, 191-2).
The general consensus on the nature and scope of the "laws of nature"
within the scientific community has been set out by Davies (Davies 1992,
72-92). In general terms, the "laws of nature" can be considered to
have to following features.
1) They are universal. The laws of physics are assumed to be valid at
every place and every time. They are held "to apply unfailingly
everywhere in the universe and at all epochs of cosmic history" (Davies
1992, 82). There is an interesting parallel here with the criterion
introduced in the century by Vincent of Lérins for Christian doctrines,
which were required to be things which were believed "everywhere, always
and by all (quod ubique, quod temper, quod ab omnibus creditum est)."
2) They are absolute -- that is to say, that they do not depend on the
nature of the observer (for example, his or her social status, gender,
or sexual orientation). The state of a system may change over time, and
be related to a series of contingent and circ*mstantial considerations;
the laws, which provide correlation between those states at various
moments, do not change with time. This aspect of the laws of nature
causes serious difficulties for a postmodern worldview, which we shall
examine in a later section of this project.
3) They are eternal, in that they are held to be grounded in the
mathematical structures which are used to represent the physical world.
The remarkable correlation between what we shall loosely term
"mathematical reality" and the observed physical world is of
considerable significance, and we shall return to this matter later. It
is of considerable importance in this context to note that all known
fundamental laws are mathematical in form.
4) They are omnipotent, in that nothing can he held to he outside their
scope.
It will not have escaped the reader’s notice that these attributes which
are, by common agreement and convention, applied to the "laws of
nature", show remarkable affinities with those which are traditionally
applied to God in theistic religious systems, such as Christianity.
Davies' analysis thus raises the question of the relation between God
and the 'last of nature', to which we now turn.
GOD AND THE LAWS OF NATURE
We may take as our Starting point a statement of Davies, who argues that
God cannot “be omnipotent, for he could not act outside the laws of
nature" (Davies 1984, 209). This, however, fails to take account of a
fundamental debate within both Christian theology and the philosophy of
religion, focussing on the question of the power of God (Oakley 1984;
van den Brink 1993; Moonan I994). In what follows, we shall explore this
major discussion, and indicate its relevance to the relation of God and
the laws of nature.
How can God act absolutely reliably, without being subject to some
external agency which compels God to act in this way? This question was
debated with some heat at Paris in the thirteenth century, in response
to a form of determism linked with the writer Averroes. For Averroes,
the reliability of God ultimately rested upon external pressures. God
was compelled to act in certain ways -- and thus acted reliably. This
approach was, however, regarded with intense suspicion by most
theologians, who saw it as a crude denial of the freedom of God. But how
could God be Said to act reliably, unless it was through external
compulsion?
In what follows, we shall consider the answer given during the
thirteenth and fourteenth centuries by writers such as Duns Scotus and
William of Ockham. The fundamental principle which is stated by these
writers is that the reliability of God is ultimately grounded in the
divine nature itself. God does not act reliably because someone or
something makes God act in this way, but because of a deliberate and
free divine decision to act like this. This decision was not a result of
coercion or external constraint, but a free decision reflecting the
nature of God himself.
In his discussion of the opening line of the Apostle’s Creed -- “I
believe in God the Father almighty” -- Ockham asks precisely what is
meant by the word “almighty (omnipotens).” It cannot, he argues, mean
that God is presently able to do anything and everything; rather, it
means that God was once free to act in this way. God has now
established an order of things which reflects a loving and righteous
divine will -- and that order, once established, will remain until the
end of time.
Ockham uses two terms to refer to these different options. The “absolute
power of God (potentia Dei absoluta)” refers to the theoretical
possibilities prior to commitment to any course of action or world
ordering. The “ordained power of God (potentia Dei ordinata)" refers to
the way things now are, which reflects the order established by God their
creator. These do not represent two different sets of options now open
to God. They represent two different moments in the great history of
salvation. And our concern is with the ordained power of God, the way in
which God orders the creation at present.
The distinction is important, yet difficult. In view of this, we shall
explore it in a little more detail. Ockham is inviting us to consider
two very different situations in which we might speak of the
“omnipotence of God." The first is this: God is confronted with a whole
array of possibilities -- such as creating the world, or not creating
the world. God can choose to actualize any of these possibilities. This
is the absolute power of God, which refers to a situation in which God
has not yet acted. (It should be noted that, for the sake of clarity of
explanation of this specific issue, we have disregarded the question of
whether God be said to “create time” or “create within time.” This is an
immensely important debate, which cannot be considered fully at this
point).
We now move away from this scenario, in which we were invited to
consider a range of possibilities which God had the potential to enact.
We now consider the scenario in which God acts -- for example, by
ordering the universe. God has chosen some options, and brought them
into being, with the result that certain potentialities are now
actualities. We are now in the realm of the ordained power of God -- a
realm in which God's power is restricted, by virtue of God's own
decision. Ockham's point is that by choosing to actualize some
potentialities, God has implicitly chosen not to actualize others.
Choosing to do something means choosing not to do something else. Once
God has chosen to create the world, the option of not creating the World
is set to one side. This means that there are certain things which God
could do once that can no longer be done. Although God could have
decided not to create the world, God has now deliberately rejected that
possibility. And that rejection means that this possibility is no longer
open.
This leads to what seems, at first sight, to be a paradoxical situation.
On account of the divine omnipotence, God is not now able to do
everything. By exercising the divine power, God has limited options. For
Ockham, God cannot now do everything. God has deliberately limited the
possibilities. God chose to limit the options which are now open. Is
that a contradiction? No. If God is really capable of doing anything,
then God must be able to become committed to a course of action -- and
stay committed to it. God can thus be said to act according to
established laws — but these are not laws which somehow have their to
origination outside God, or which can be thought of as contrary to the
nature of God. They themselves are the creation of God, and reflect the
nature and character. In acting according to established laws, God is
remaining faithful to an expression of his own nature, brought about by
his own free decision. Ockham expresses this as follows (Ockham 1966,
vol. 9, 585-6):
'God is able to do some things by his ordained power (de potentia
ordinata) and others by his absolute power (de potentia absoluta). This
distinction should not be understood to mean that there are actually in
God too powers, one of which is “ordained” and the other of which is
“absolute,” because there is only one power of God directed towards the
external world, the exercise of which is in all respects God himself.
Nor should this be understood to mean that God can do some things by his
ordained power, and others by his absolute, not his ordained, power, in
that God does nothing without having first ordained it. But it should be
understood in this way: God can do something in a manner which is
established by laws which were ordained and established by God. In this
respect, God acts according to his ordained power."
The relevance of this analysis to Davies’ statement will be clear.
Within a theistic perspective, such as that offered by Christianity, it
is quite misleading to posit a tension between God and the laws of
nature, as if the latter were somehow independent of the former, or in
some way contradicted each other. We could thus say that the absolute
power of God refers to t = 0, whereas the ordained power of God refers
to t > 0. The Christian will hold that God’s nature is somehow
expressed and embodied in the ordering of the world, which underlies the
laws of nature. That God “obeys” such laws cannot conceivably be taken
to mean that God is subservient to another being, or is obligated or
otherwise Constrained to work within an alien framework which is not of
his own making. There is a fundamental line of continuity between the
creator, the regularity of the creation, and the human perception and
expression of this regularity in the form of “laws of nature.”
&&&&
ORDERING AND MECHANISM: FROM NEWTON TO PALEY
It is a simple matter of historical fact that the relationship between
“natural theology” and the “natural sciences” has been remarkably
ambivalent in terms of its intentions and outcomes. One the one hand, a
strategy originally devised by religious writers to heighten the
awareness of a religious dimension to nature ended up offering new
opportunities for a purely secular interpretation of the world; on the
other, one intended to accentuate a purely naturalistic interpretation
of the world has proved remarkably amenable to a religious position
(Brooke 1989). Nevertheless, it can be shown without difficulty that one
of the most distinctive features of British intellectual life from the
late seventeenth to the late nineteenth centuries was a pervasive belief
that science was allied to the cause of religion.
The origins of this trend are generally agreed to lie particularly with
the use made of Newton’s Principia by the Anglican apologists of the
late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries (Metzger 1938; Jacob
1976; Jacob and Jacob 1980). The factors which led to this development
are not fully understood, although there is agreement that they probably
include the following (Gascoigne 1988, 222-4):
1) A focus on natural theology led to public interest in the
interpretation of the natural world, rather than the more controversial
matter of the interpretation of the Bible (see further below) or matters
of doctrinal disagreement between various church groupings or
theological schools.
2) The nature of ecclesiastic politics in England following the
post—1688 constitution favoured that section of the Church of England
which placed an emphasis on the role of reason, rather than those which
stressed the transcendental character of divine revelation (Jacob 1976).
3) The Newtonian concept of gravity, interpreted within a theological
framework which stressed the operation of divine providence, seemed to
offer a means by which divine involvement in the World could be
maintained without lapsing into monism or dualism.
Yet it was not long before what had seemed to be a promising alliance
between science and religion led to a growing and potentially
irreversible estrangement (Odom 1966). The Newtonian system seemed to
many to suggest that the world was a self-sustaining mechanism which had
no need for divine governance or sustenance for its day-to-day
operation. By the end of the eighteenth century, it seemed to many that
Newton's system actually led to atheism or agnosticism, rather than to
faith. This can be seen reflected both in Laplace’s Treatise of
Celestial Mechanics, which effectively eliminated the need for God
(either as explanatory hypothesis or as active sustainer) in cosmology
(Odom 1966; Hahn 1981), and in the writings of the poet William Blake,
in which the Newtonian worldview is occasionally equated with Satan
(Ault l974). Percy Bysshe Shelley famously remarked that “the consistent
Newtonian is necessarily an atheist,” while Samuel Taylor Coleridge
conceded that Newton's general approach obviated the need for God (Force
1985, 155; Gascoigne 1988, 234).
Yet the rise of a mechanistic view of the world offered another approach
to natural theology, which was seized upon by some of the leading
apologists of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century (Bennett
1986). The metaphor of the universe as clockwork had already been
deployed before the advent of its most famous exponent (Mayr 1986);
nevertheless, it was in the writings of William Paley that it found its
most celebrated presentation (Clarke 1974; LeMahieu 1976; Gillespie
1990). For Paley, the Newtonian image of the world as a mechanism
immediately suggested the metaphor of a clock or watch, raising the
question of who constructed the intricate mechanism which was so
evidently displayed in the functioning of the world. Although it is
currently fashionable to deride Paley’s natural theology, this generally
rests on a failure to recognize how he managed to transform the
“clockwork” metaphor from an icon of scepticism and atheism to an
apologetic affirmation of the existence of God. As Mayr has
demonstrated, the English tradition of natural theology had, up to this
point, shied away from an appeal to mechanism, apparently for fear of
its philosophical implications (Mayr 1986, 9O~lUl). Paley saw an
apologetic opening, and seized it.
One of Paley’s most significant arguments is that mechanism implies
contrivance. Writing against the backdrop of the emerging Industrial
Revolution, Paley sought to exploit the apologetic potential of the
growing interest in machinery -- such as “watches, telescopes,
stocking-mills, and steam engines" -- within England’s literate classes
(Gillespie 1990, 216-17). For some, the mechanistic model of the
universe implied a lifeless deity (famously derided by Blake as
“Nonbodaddy”). For Paley, the model offered a new defense of the
existence of God.
The general thrust of this defense is well known, Noting the
proliferation of machinery in the England of his time, Paley argues that
only someone who is mad would suggest that such complex mechanical
technology came into being by purposeless chance. Mechanism presupposes
contrivance -- that is to say, a sense of purpose and an ability to
design and fabricate. Both the human body in particular, and the world
in general, could be seen as mechanisms which had been designed and
constructed in such a manner as to achieve harmony of both means and
ends. It must be stressed that Paley is not suggesting that there
exists an analogy between human mechanical devices and nature. The
force of his argument rests on an identity: nature is a mechanism, and
hence was possessed of an intelligent design (Gillespie 1990, 722-7).
In the end, Paley's defence of divine design may be Judged to have
failed, partly on account of the rise of Darwinism in the second part of
the nineteenth century. It is, nevertheless, an interesting episode in
natural theology, which cannot be seen simply as part of the traditional
cosmological argument (which antedated the mechanical revolution) nor
traditional natural theology (which focused ‘on natural history,
following a pattern established by John Ray in his classic Wisdom of God
Manifested in the Works of Creation (1691)). It also illustrates the
manner in which “order” and “mechanism” were seen as closely related,
for theological reasons." [The Quest For Order, The Foundations of
Dialogue In Science & Religion, Alister E. McGrath, p 59-69]
c) SEVEN ASTERISM (Within each of the four symbols there are seven
astrological mansions (pinyin), or positions, of the moon) / #2 - DUAD
(FORM as World of Creation - BRIYAH) as 7 DOUBLE expressing the
following meta-principles:
Seven Chinese constellations are contained in the area of the sky
identified with one of the western mansions of the White Tiger.
TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 - NATURE
CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM (Gk.
Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy seat
to the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God communed
with Israel)}
PENTAD - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:--seat,
throne)}
HEXAD - #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE / #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE:
{DALETH (DOUBLE - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE {#6 - FORM OF NATURE}) /
*DOMINIONS* (Gk. Kuriotes - mastery, that is, (concretely and
collectively) rulers:--dominion, government)}
HEPTAD - #11 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE {KAF (DOUBLE - #4 - NATURE
AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: {#7 - ENGENDERING NATURE}) / Government &
Non-Government Organisations}
OGDOAD - #17 / #5 - ACT OF NATURE: {PE / DOUBLE - #5 - ACT OF NATURE (#8
- TRANSFORMING NATURE)}
ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL*
*OTHER* *THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE*
*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General,
or, *in* *the* *event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to
such person or persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the*
*PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE*
*GOVERNMENT* of Our said Commonwealth.
.
DECAD - #22 / #10 - *TOTALITY* *OF* *NATURE*: {TAU / DOUBLE - #9 -
ENGENDERING NATURE (TOTALITY OF NATURE)}
X - And We do *further* *direct* *and* *enjoin* *that* *these* *Our*
*Letters* *Patent* *shall* *be* *read* *and* *proclaimed* *at* *such*
*place* *or* *places* *as* Our said Governor General *shall* *think*
*fit* within Our said Commonwealth of Australia.
*GENTILE* (*ROMAN*/*GREEK*) *HYMENEAL* V'S *TORAH* (*JEWISH*) HUMAN
RATIONAL NATURE AS REASONED *VIEW* *OF* *NATURAL* *LAW*
(a) The natural law is universal, that is to say, it applies to the
entire human race, and is in itself the same for all. Every man, because
he is a man, is bound, if he will conform to the universal order willed
by the Creator, to live conformably to his own rational nature, and to
be guided by reason.
(b) The natural law is immutable in itself and also extrinsically. Since
it is founded in the very nature of man and his destination to his
end—two bases which rest upon the immutable ground of the eternal law—it
follows that, assuming the continued existence of human nature, it
cannot cease to exist. The natural law commands and forbids in the same
tenor everywhere and always. We must, however, remember that this
immutability pertains not to those abstract imperfect formulae in which
the law is commonly expressed, but to the moral standard as it applies
to action in the concrete, surrounded with all its determinate conditions.
ORDERING AND MECHANISM: FROM NEWTON TO PALEY
It is a simple matter of historical fact that the relationship between
“natural theology” and the “natural sciences” has been remarkably
ambivalent in terms of its intentions and outcomes. One the one hand, a
strategy originally devised by religious writers to heighten the
awareness of a religious dimension to nature ended up offering new
opportunities for a purely secular interpretation of the world; on the
other, one intended to accentuate a purely naturalistic interpretation
of the world has proved remarkably amenable to a religious position
(Brooke 1989). Nevertheless, it can be shown without difficulty that one
of the most distinctive features of British intellectual life from the
late seventeenth to the late nineteenth centuries was a pervasive belief
that science was allied to the cause of religion.
The origins of this trend are generally agreed to lie particularly with
the use made of Newton’s Principia by the Anglican apologists of the
late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries (Metzger 1938; Jacob
1976; Jacob and Jacob 1980). The factors which led to this development
are not fully understood, although there is agreement that they probably
include the following (Gascoigne 1988, 222-4):
1) A focus on natural theology led to public interest in the
interpretation of the natural world, rather than the more controversial
matter of the interpretation of the Bible (see further below) or matters
of doctrinal disagreement between various church groupings or
theological schools.
2) The nature of ecclesiastic politics in England following the
post—1688 constitution favoured that section of the Church of England
which placed an emphasis on the role of reason, rather than those which
stressed the transcendental character of divine revelation (Jacob 1976).
3) The Newtonian concept of gravity, interpreted within a theological
framework which stressed the operation of divine providence, seemed to
offer a means by which divine involvement in the World could be
maintained without lapsing into monism or dualism.
Yet it was not long before what had seemed to be a promising alliance
between science and religion led to a growing and potentially
irreversible estrangement (Odom 1966). The Newtonian system seemed to
many to suggest that the world was a self-sustaining mechanism which had
no need for divine governance or sustenance for its day-to-day
operation. By the end of the eighteenth century, it seemed to many that
Newton's system actually led to atheism or agnosticism, rather than to
faith. This can be seen reflected both in Laplace’s Treatise of
Celestial Mechanics, which effectively eliminated the need for God
(either as explanatory hypothesis or as active sustainer) in cosmology
(Odom 1966; Hahn 1981), and in the writings of the poet William Blake,
in which the Newtonian worldview is occasionally equated with Satan
(Ault l974). Percy Bysshe Shelley famously remarked that “the consistent
Newtonian is necessarily an atheist,” while Samuel Taylor Coleridge
conceded that Newton's general approach obviated the need for God (Force
1985, 155; Gascoigne 1988, 234).
Yet the rise of a mechanistic view of the world offered another approach
to natural theology, which was seized upon by some of the leading
apologists of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century (Bennett
1986). The metaphor of the universe as clockwork had already been
deployed before the advent of its most famous exponent (Mayr 1986);
nevertheless, it was in the writings of William Paley that it found its
most celebrated presentation (Clarke 1974; LeMahieu 1976; Gillespie
1990). For Paley, the Newtonian image of the world as a mechanism
immediately suggested the metaphor of a clock or watch, raising the
question of who constructed the intricate mechanism which was so
evidently displayed in the functioning of the world. Although it is
currently fashionable to deride Paley’s natural theology, this generally
rests on a failure to recognize how he managed to transform the
“clockwork” metaphor from an icon of scepticism and atheism to an
apologetic affirmation of the existence of God. As Mayr has
demonstrated, the English tradition of natural theology had, up to this
point, shied away from an appeal to mechanism, apparently for fear of
its philosophical implications (Mayr 1986, 9O~lUl). Paley saw an
apologetic opening, and seized it.
One of Paley’s most significant arguments is that mechanism implies
contrivance. Writing against the backdrop of the emerging Industrial
Revolution, Paley sought to exploit the apologetic potential of the
growing interest in machinery -- such as “watches, telescopes,
stocking-mills, and steam engines" -- within England’s literate classes
(Gillespie 1990, 216-17). For some, the mechanistic model of the
universe implied a lifeless deity (famously derided by Blake as
“Nonbodaddy”). For Paley, the model offered a new defense of the
existence of God.
The general thrust of this defense is well known, Noting the
proliferation of machinery in the England of his time, Paley argues that
only someone who is mad would suggest that such complex mechanical
technology came into being by purposeless chance. Mechanism presupposes
contrivance -- that is to say, a sense of purpose and an ability to
design and fabricate. Both the human body in particular, and the world
in general, could be seen as mechanisms which had been designed and
constructed in such a manner as to achieve harmony of both means and
ends. It must be stressed that Paley is not suggesting that there
exists an analogy between human mechanical devices and nature. The
force of his argument rests on an identity: nature is a mechanism, and
hence was possessed of an intelligent design (Gillespie 1990, 722-7).
In the end, Paley's defence of divine design may be Judged to have
failed, partly on account of the rise of Darwinism in the second part of
the nineteenth century. It is, nevertheless, an interesting episode in
natural theology, which cannot be seen simply as part of the traditional
cosmological argument (which antedated the mechanical revolution) nor
traditional natural theology (which focused ‘on natural history,
following a pattern established by John Ray in his classic Wisdom of God
Manifested in the Works of Creation (1691)). It also illustrates the
manner in which “order” and “mechanism” were seen as closely related,
for theological reasons." [The Quest For Order, The Foundations of
Dialogue In Science & Religion, Alister E. McGrath, p 59-69]
c) SEVEN ASTERISM (Within each of the four symbols there are seven
astrological mansions (pinyin), or positions, of the moon) / #2 - DUAD
(FORM as World of Creation - BRIYAH) as 7 DOUBLE expressing the
following meta-principles:
Seven Chinese constellations are contained in the area of the sky
identified with one of the western mansions of the White Tiger.
TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 - NATURE
CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM (Gk.
Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy seat
to the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God communed
with Israel)}
PENTAD - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:--seat,
throne)}
HEXAD - #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE / #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE:
{DALETH (DOUBLE - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE {#6 - FORM OF NATURE}) /
*DOMINIONS* (Gk. Kuriotes - mastery, that is, (concretely and
collectively) rulers:--dominion, government)}
HEPTAD - #11 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE {KAF (DOUBLE - #4 - NATURE
AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: {#7 - ENGENDERING NATURE}) / Government &
Non-Government Organisations}
OGDOAD - #17 / #5 - ACT OF NATURE: {PE / DOUBLE - #5 - ACT OF NATURE (#8
- TRANSFORMING NATURE)}
ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL*
*OTHER* *THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE*
*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General,
or, *in* *the* *event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to
such person or persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the*
*PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE*
*GOVERNMENT* of Our said Commonwealth.
.
DECAD - #22 / #10 - *TOTALITY* *OF* *NATURE*: {TAU / DOUBLE - #9 -
ENGENDERING NATURE (TOTALITY OF NATURE)}
X - And We do *further* *direct* *and* *enjoin* *that* *these* *Our*
*Letters* *Patent* *shall* *be* *read* *and* *proclaimed* *at* *such*
*place* *or* *places* *as* Our said Governor General *shall* *think*
*fit* within Our said Commonwealth of Australia.
*GENTILE* (*ROMAN*/*GREEK*) *HYMENEAL* V'S *TORAH* (*JEWISH*) HUMAN
RATIONAL NATURE AS REASONED *VIEW* *OF* *NATURAL* *LAW*
(a) The natural law is universal, that is to say, it applies to the
entire human race, and is in itself the same for all. Every man, because
he is a man, is bound, if he will conform to the universal order willed
by the Creator, to live conformably to his own rational nature, and to
be guided by reason.
(b) The natural law is immutable in itself and also extrinsically. Since
it is founded in the very nature of man and his destination to his
end—two bases which rest upon the immutable ground of the eternal law—it
follows that, assuming the continued existence of human nature, it
cannot cease to exist. The natural law commands and forbids in the same
tenor everywhere and always. We must, however, remember that this
immutability pertains not to those abstract imperfect formulae in which
the law is commonly expressed, but to the moral standard as it applies
to action in the concrete, surrounded with all its determinate conditions.
It is also possible to view this consensus ad idem as dispensational
basis of governance shown above by memetic specific colour attributions
{ie. vBeige/vBronze: #69, vPurple: #9, vRed: #32, vBlue: #20, vOrange:
#61, vGreen: #73, vYellow: #35, vTurquoise/vCyan: #58, vCoral: #41}
accompanying the conception of Pythagorean Number and Platonic solids as
also capable of being conveyed in terms of stages, tectonics of
knowledge or process, states or provinces, or phases of a cycle or
development {eg: the Indigenous Australian Aboriginal regard (mythical
or otherwise) for seven climatic zones comprising the seasonal year},
historically, as a milestone, by covenant, as authority and power, or
simply as specific daemons provided by the temporal / nomenal reality
mapping at the chronological 4th plane of the Grapple paradigm.
*MANIFEST* *NARRATIVE*:
#69 - PROFOUND USE, FUNCTION OF THE MYSTERIOUS; I-CHING: H34 - STRENGTH
OF GREATNESS; TETRA: 22 - RESISTANCE;
1) The Stomach (胃宿 as Wèi Xiù - Stomach, fingers and granary/Aries)
comprising 3 stars is one of the twenty-eight mansions of the Chinese
constellations / TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (#2)
(DOUBLE - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) /
CHERUBIM (Gk. Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered
the mercy seat to the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from
where God communed with Israel)}
@4. FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW AS SOVEREIGNTY / *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
{3W1D}
-- The union of a man and a woman
#9 - INCONSTANCY OF ACHIEVEMENT, PRACTICING PLACIDITY; I-CHING: H7 -
ARMY; TETRA: 32 - LEGION;
2) Celestial Foodstuff (天廩 - The barn/Taurus) comprising 4 stars /
PENTAD - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (#3) (DOUBLE - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:--seat,
throne)}
@5. (MOTHER) FORMULA OF HUMANITY AS HEAD OF STATE / *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
-- to the exclusion of all others,
#32 - NATURAL GUIDE, VIRTUE OF HOLINESS; I-CHING: H44 - COMING ON;
TETRA: 43 - ENCOUNTERS;
3) Circular Celestial Granary (天囷 - The round barn/Cetus) comprising 13
stars; / HEXAD - #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE / NATURE CONTAINS
NATURE: {DALETH (#4) (DOUBLE - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE {#6 - FORM OF
NATURE}) / *DOMINIONS* (Gk. Kuriotes - mastery, that is, (concretely and
collectively) rulers:--dominion, government)}
@6. FORMULA OF AUTONOMY AS INDIVIDUAL / *DO* *NOT* *KILL*
-- voluntarily
#20 - LEFT WITHOUT LANGUAGE, DIFFERENT FROM THE VULGAR; I-CHING: H33 -
WITHDRAWAL; TETRA: 50 - VASTNESS/WASTING;
Four Chinese constellations are contained in the area of the sky
identified with Perseus in the West:
4) Tiānchuán (天船, Perseus constellation), the Celestial Boat (General
big warships, or the ship has sailed galaxy) / HEPTAD - #11 -
TRANSFORMING NATURE {KAF (#20) (DOUBLE - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE:
{#7 - ENGENDERING NATURE}) / Government & Non-Government Organisations}
@7. FORMULA OF PROGRESSION / *AVOID* *SPIRITUAL* *ADULTERY* *AS*
*HETERONOMY* *AGAINST* *AUTONOMY* {CIRCA 49J7W} [John 5:43-47]
-- entered into for life.
#61 - VIRTUOUS HUMILITY AT USING 'BENEATH'; I-CHING: H64 - BEFORE
COMPLETION; TETRA: 78 - ON THE VERGE;
Comprising 9 stars, was the third paranatellon (A star or constellation
which rises at the same time as another star or object) of the third
house of the White Tiger of the West, representing the boats that
Chinese people were reminded to build in case of a catastrophic flood
season. Incorporating stars from the northern part of the constellation,
it contained Mu/M (#40), Delta/D (#4), Psi/Y (#700), Alpha/A (#1),
Gamma/C (#3) and Eta/H Persei.
5) Jīshuǐ (積水, Perseus constellation), the Swollen/Stored Waters
(stored-water ship) / OGDOAD - #17 - ACT OF NATURE: {PE (#80) / DOUBLE -
ACT OF NATURE (TRANSFORMING NATURE)}
@8. DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN NATURE) AS OBJECTIVE GROUNDING OF
INFINITY / *DO* *NOT* *STEAL* {72J + 3(3²+1)/2}
-- How is Australian Fascism as a 'formal definition of mono-gamous
gamo-genesis' and piety 'monogenes' [John 1:17-18] any different from
German Fascism?
Strictly speaking, our nature is the proximate discriminating norm or
standard. The remote and ultimate norm, of which it is the partial
reflection and application, is the Divine nature itself, the ultimate
groundwork of the created order.
Marriage was defined within our Australian Constitution of 1901 by the
single term: 'Marriage' and therefore it's interpretation is reliant
upon Natural and Common Law representations.
Until 2004 when it was more clearly and improperly defined as a fascist
values based hymenealism within our Australian legislation and is still
not presently lawful for me.
"In 15 September 1935, the first Nuremberg Law (so-called because they
were announced at the first great Nazi rally held at Nuremberg)
proclaimed the Reich Citizenship Law which meant Jews could no longer
call themselves Germans and had no political rights.
A second Nuremberg Law was called the Law for the Protection of German
Blood and German Honor, which banned marriage and sex between those
defined as Germans and those defined as Jews." [Wikipedia
2016:Nuremberg_Laws]
"Infinity itself is the actual Logos as concept. Both the 'logical' and
the 'subjective' grounding of infinity--as we call them in short--are
already carried out in the thoroughly concrete investigation ... [and
found that] everything [was] still at the beginning and is more within
the scope of a confrontation with tradition; it has not yet found its
own necessary shape.
This happens for the first time in the 'System of Science' {ie. The
science, whose system is at issue, is the totality of the highest and
most essential knowledge as philosophy--The way in which philosophy
unfolds itself as absolute knowledge. By providing all sciences with
their foundation, philosophy must certainly be a science}, whose first
part, the Phenomenology, represents the grounding we mentioned as our
2nd point (the grounding of infinity in the subject and as subject),
while the second part, the Logic, implements the 1st grounding that we
mentioned above (the logical grounding), which is inherently and
necessarily grounded in the 2nd one." [Martin Heidegger (1889-1976 CE),
'Mediatedness & the Dialectical Movement' on 'Hegel’s Phenomenology of
Spirit', p 78]
#73 - EMPLOYING DEEMING, DARING TO ACT; I-CHING: H46 - MOVING UPWARD;
TETRA: 7 - ASCENT;
Comprising 1 star, was the fourth paranatellon of the aforementioned
house, representing the potential of unusually high floods during the
end of August and beginning of September at the beginning of the flood
season. Lambda and possibly Mu Persei lay within it.
6) Dàlíng (大陵, Perseus constellation), the Great Trench/Mausoleum (The
mausoleum) / ENNEAD - #20 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH (#200) / DOUBLE -
FORM OF NATURE (AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
@9. BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS - MARRIAGE?), AS FAUX LOGICAL GROUNDING
OF INFINITY / *DO* *NOT* *BEAR* *FALSE* *WITNESS* {AUGUSTUS (27 BCE -
#14 CE) - #15CE - TIBERIUS (#14 – #37 CE)... #34CE - CALIGULA (#37 - #41
CE) ... #65CE - NERO (#666: #54 - #68 CE) ... #2000CE < --- Holy
Catholic 'Satanic' Tradition et al as faux-sophistic wisdom}
The binding or obligatory norm is the Divine authority, imposing upon
the rational creature the obligation of living in conformity with his
nature, and thus with the universal order established by the Creator.
Contrary to the Kantian theory that we must not acknowledge any other
lawgiver than conscience, the truth is that reason as conscience is only
immediate moral authority which we are called upon to obey, and
conscience itself owes its authority to the fact that it is the
mouthpiece of the Divine will and imperium.
With regard to the possibility of any change by abrogation or
dispensation, there can be no question of such being introduced by any
authority except that of God Himself. But reason forbids us to think
that even He could exercise such power, because, given the hypothesis
that He wills man to exist, He wills him necessarily to live conformably
to the eternal law, by observing in his conduct the law of reason. The
Almighty, then, cannot be conceived as willing this and simultaneously
willing the contradictory, that man should be set free from the law
entirely through its abrogation, or partially through dispensation from
it. It is true that some of the older theologians, followed or copied by
some later ones, hold that God can dispense, and, in fact in some
instances, has dispensed from the secondary precepts of the natural law,
while others maintain that the bearing of the natural law is changed by
the operation of positive law. However, an examination of the arguments
offered in support of these opinions shows that the alleged examples of
dispensation are: (a) cases where a change of conditions modifies the
application of the law, or (b) cases concerning obligations not imposed
as absolutely essential to the moral order, though their fulfilment is
necessary for the full perfection of conduct, or (c) instances of
addition made to the law.
#35 - GREAT GUIDING SIGNS?, VIRTUE OF BENEVOLENCE; I-CHING: H17 -
ALLEGIANCE; TETRA: 19 - FOLLOWING;
7) Jīshī (積屍, *Algol*, Perseus/Camelopardalis constellation), the
Pile/Heap of Corpses prior to their interment (The body within the
tomb) / DECAD - #22 - *TOTALITY* *OF* *NATURE*: {TAU (#400) / DOUBLE -
ENGENDERING NATURE (TOTALITY OF NATURE)}
@10. MANIFESTING NORM (NORMA DENUNTIANS) / *DO* *NOT* *COVET* {122J3W1D
+ 9(9²+1)/2}
The manifesting norm (norma denuntians), determines the moral quality of
actions tried by the discriminating norm, is reason. Through this
faculty we perceive what is the moral constitution of our nature, what
kind of action it calls for, and whether a particular action possesses
this requisite character.
As the fundamental and all-embracing obligation imposed upon man by the
Creator, the natural law is the one to which all his other obligations
are attached. The duties imposed on us in the supernatural law come home
to us, because the natural law and its exponent, conscience, tell us
that, if God has vouchsafed to us a supernatural revelation with a
series of precepts, we are bound to accept and obey it. The natural law
is the foundation of all human law inasmuch as it ordains that man shall
live in society, and society for its constitution requires the existence
of an authority, which shall possess the moral power necessary to
control the members and direct them to the common good. Human laws are
valid and equitable only in so far as they correspond with, and enforce
or supplement the natural law; they are null and void when they conflict
with it. The United States system of equity courts, as distinguished
from those engaged in the administration of the common law, are founded
on the principle that, when the law of the legislator is not in harmony
with the dictates of the natural law, equity (æquitas, epikeia) demands
that it be set aside or corrected.
Catholic Encyclopedia, Natural Law @
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09076a.htm
DOLF: "WHY IS IT, THE MOMENT THAT ADOLF HITLER'S LEADERSHIP AND WAR
INTEGRITY IS BROUGHT INTO QUESTION, that all these anonymous Usenet
trolls want to give you a gang-bang as collective kicking?
They are after all on the wrong side of our Australia's ANZAC tradition
and this is evidence of it...
Hark now, is that a soldier I hear turning in their grave?
Note that this ought to be understood in the terms of the
prognostication of the day given prior to 0800 hours: "Liar, Liar pants
on fire."
"A bus driver was killed in horror attack after man sets him on fire
while he was picking up passengers.
Mr Manmeet Alisher (29yo) was 'covered in flames' when a 48-year-old man
ran onto the bus as it was picking up passengers on Beaudesert Road in
Moorooka and doused him in accelerant before setting him alight.
Witnesses told 7 News they heard passengers scream, trying to bang on
the glass to get out with a local cab driver hailed as a hero after
breaking in the back window to free those trapped inside." [1045 hours
on October 28, 2016, by Caity Stone and Niamh Hannon - Yahoo7]
-
https://au.news.yahoo.com/a/33032700/pictured-bus-driver-killed-in-horror-attack-after-man-sets-him-on-fire-while-he-was-picking-up-passengers
PETER JASON (***@JOSTLE.COM): "So RUDE! Why don't you inveigh against
WALL ST? There the enemy lies (yes, it's a pun)."
DOLF: "Read the sentence just prior and which said '… my AUTONOMY OF
WILL as a SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE which is defined reasonably and rationally
as an egalitarian right by a chronological/mathematical statement of a
theoretical nomonen in accordance with Universal Natural and Common Law…'
If it is a foundational, framework and enabling technology associated to
the originating Letters Patent instigating the Federation of the
Commonwealth of Australia of 1901 which is related to human rationality,
reasoning, language and coherence as expression of an instantiated
consciousness within the temporal reality.
There isn't a human activity which won't benefit from it.
All those endless licensing, transaction and services fees--the
immeasurable wealth as the economy of the future.
***@ckwit!"
PETER JASON (***@JOSTLE.COM): "A year in military school will teach you
RESPECT for your betters! You sticky-fingered teen troll!
Now is this splinter of a malcontent. Made a real Bummer by another Dork!
Run off now, before I come on over & STOMP on your CAT!"
DOLF: "I had a year in the police school and they taught me all I need
to know about systematic bastardisation:
- Phase 1
- Phase 2
- Phase 3
Don't complain about rudeness when your opening remark was 'Can/may we
get a concise synopsis?' as an implied lack of coherence on my part..."
Having provided the intellectual means for:
- World war II <-- defined fascist categorical imperative/modus operandi
- Vietnam War
- Afghanistan War
- Iraqi War
I don't see any virtue in that you can claim any authentic association
to our ANZAC tradition--could you explain it?
Don't tell me--you claim a jingoistic superior preservation of
*blood*-line association and a marriage virtue as fascist ideology by
any other name."
FRAN {free} SNORTILUS (***@ITSAHOOT.COM): "I won't. Nothing anyone
could ever say would penetrates your skull. You're off with the pixies
and as crazy as a loon."
DOLF: "As a rabid dog why don't you go 'piss on' or go 'give the hump to
someone' else's leg since you can't find a tire (ie. It's the US
spelling of tyre as a real intellectualism and clever PUN).
PISS ON:
- to disrespect and give attitude to someone who deserves it
GET (OR HAVE OR GIVE SOMEONE) THE HUMP:
- [British informal]: become, be, or make someone annoyed or moody.
TIRE/TYRE {strength; rock; sharp}:
- [no objective] (tire of) lose interest in; become bored with: she will
stay with him until he tires of her.
- [with objective] exhaust the patience or interest of;
Unlike you, I'm kind to animals.
However, I will NOT condescend to your FASCIST ***@NT {ie. an unpleasant
or stupid person} EGO."
FRAN {free} SNORTILUS (***@ITSAHOOT.COM): "Oh looky there dolt! Do you
notice a pattern emerging? How many people in the last 24 hours have
implied that you have a problem?
I repeat, you are a loon and you should seek medical help.
Go back through the thread and see how many OTHER people whose names
you've posted under who also very obviously think you have a problem."
DOLF: "Again you are being selective in your perverse characterisation
as an attempt to self-justify yourself by any means, than to provide
anything factual as to the unreasonableness and irrationality of any of
my past summarised statements."
FRAN {free} SNORTILUS (***@ITSAHOOT.COM): "I know you're barking mad but
as you're pretending to be me, put some effort into writing intelligible
English rather than your usual string on dribble.
DOLF: "The person in question whom you are sharing equivalent values,
admits to engaging within animal cruelty which is held by some to be a
psychiatric symptom of violence towards another person's self identity
as formula of autonomy."
FRAN {free} SNORTILUS (***@ITSAHOOT.COM): ":-)) No surprise there.
Everyone else he's ever threatened is also still waiting. He's crazy as
a loon and bays at the moon each month."
JEBUS (***@J.NET): "I've known a few genuine fruit-loops on Usenet over
the past 18 years or so, dolt is definitely up there with the best of
them. :-)"
DOLF: "I do think, that given Fran {free} Snortilus' nihilism which is
readily on display and her loony recourse to a phrenologist pun:
'Nothing anyone could ever say would penetrates your skull' as fascist
pseudo-science.
Phrenology (from Greek φρήν (phrēn), meaning 'mind', and λόγος (logos),
meaning 'knowledge') is a pseudo-medicine primarily focused on
measurements of the human skull, based on the concept that the brain is
the organ of the mind, and that certain brain areas have localized,
specific functions or modules.
Is evidence enough, that both she and Jebus can't now categorically
refute the claim that their ANZAC identity is essentially FASCIST: 'a
jingoistic superiority in the preservation of *blood-line as an
association to a marriage virtue as being fascist ideology by any other
name.'
And it is this feral fascist idealism as a substituted virtue which is
imposed upon the authentic ANZAC identity characteristic which is the
cause of their unreasoned animosity as Internet conduct.
To put it simply: You are fascist?"
FRAN {free} SNORTILUS (***@ITSAHOOT.COM): "LOL. Yet another string of
unintelligible dribble falls into cyber space from the keyboard of the dolt…
You're working the insult way too hard dolt."
DOLF: "That you are incapable of answering such a question with any
meaningful integrity is sufficient for me to derive the informed and
reasonable opinion that you are neither capable of recognising virtue in
another's actions, nor able to fulfill your accountability to the
AUTONOMY OF WILL as a SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE under the Letters Patent to
the Federation of the Commonwealth of Australia 1901."
BDK (***@WORLDCONTROL.COM): "I don't care. I don't live in, never
been to, and am not a citizen of Australia. And so?
Do you think YOU are the Governor General? If not, why are you raving
about this?
And I'm [now] beaming myself onboard the invisible starship [which has
all this time been] orbiting the earth…
Energize!"
DOLF: "You failed to adequately respond by 24hrs and thus a complaint
has already gone to the American FBI and mine eye also shall see my
desire on mine enemies."
TED&ALICE (alt.usenet.kooks) @ 0730 HOURS ON 29 OCTOBER 2016: "I've come
to realize that one can generally trust dolf about these sorts of
things. You may just be in denial, Fran.”
DOLF: "Thank you, as you are a virtue of coupling {ie. the sexual action
of dogs}.
I could also resort to reading her entrails as divination if you want..."
DEBRA {*BEE*} DEE MCQUEEN FREEMAN (***@LIVE.COM) @ 0840 HOURS ON
29 MARCH 2017: "HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YOU ARE SO FUNNY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THANK YOU FOR MAKING ME LAUGH SO OFTEN AND SO MUCH !!!!!!!!!!!"
DOLF @ 0906 HOURS ON 29 MARCH 2017: "HAIL GOD OF HYMEN!
#0 CE ... #15 CE (9 as esoteric SUM #45) ... #34 CE (16 as esoteric SUM
#136) ... #65 CE (25 as esoteric SUM #325) ... #111 CE (36 as esoteric
SUM #666 as SUNDAY SACREDNESS) ... #2000 CE < --- Holy Catholic
'Satanic' Tradition as claimed JUBILEE
What do you say to the claim that JUBILEE 2000 celebrations was the
worship of Satanism?
It is an argument between which 'HETEROS' v's 'hom*oIOS' as the Theory of
Number constitutes the mind created in the image of the Creator God as
the Father (Godhead/Divine Nature as Mind) [Luke 4:5-24 (KJV); Romans
1:16-32]?"
TRUTH IS A COSMOGONIC CONSIDERATION AFTER ALL:
1) Telos (6,000) = Arch (0) + c² is a genuine Sabbath based
2) Pythagorean Theorem: a² = b² + c² is fascist (see image below)"
IT OUGHT TO BE APPARENT BY THE *VIRGIN* QUEEN ELIZABETH I'S REIGN FROM
17 NOVEMBER #1558 CE – 24 MARCH #1603 CE, THAT THERE WAS A QUESTION OF
DISTINCT PERSPECTIVES (ie. HETEROS v's hom*oIOS) OF EMPIRE GOVERNANCE
BECAUSE THEY DID NOT ADOPT THE PAPAL GREGORIAN CALENDAR REFORMS OF 1582.
It is also possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the
Gregorian calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made
divisible by 22 to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew
letters in a pattern which has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle
of the Chinese 4 BCE published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the
year into 364.5 days and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a
magic square of #369 having a distinct mathematical property at centre
of #41 for the equivalent date of 13 September.
#0 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400] as 4000 BCE
#400 MOD 22 = 17 [#PE / #80]
#800 MOD 22 = 12 [#LAMED / #30]
#1200 MOD 22 = 7 [#ZAYIN / #7]
#1600 MOD 22 = 2 [#BETH / #2]
#2000 MOD 22 = 19 [#QOPH / #100]
#2400 MOD 22 = 14 [#NUN / #50]
#2800 MOD 22 = 9 [#TETH / #9]
#3200 MOD 22 = 4 [#DALETH / #4]
#3600 MOD 22 = 21 [#SHIN / #300]
"Infinity itself is the actual Logos as concept. Both the 'logical' and
the 'subjective' grounding of infinity--as we call them in short--are
already carried out in the thoroughly concrete investigation ... [and
found that] everything [was] still at the beginning and is more within
the scope of a confrontation with tradition; it has not yet found its
own necessary shape.
This happens for the first time in the 'System of Science' {ie. The
science, whose system is at issue, is the totality of the highest and
most essential knowledge as philosophy--The way in which philosophy
unfolds itself as absolute knowledge. By providing all sciences with
their foundation, philosophy must certainly be a science}, whose first
part, the Phenomenology, represents the grounding we mentioned as our
2nd point (the grounding of infinity in the subject and as subject),
while the second part, the Logic, implements the 1st grounding that we
mentioned above (the logical grounding), which is inherently and
necessarily grounded in the 2nd one." [Martin Heidegger (1889-1976 CE),
'Mediatedness & the Dialectical Movement' on 'Hegel's Phenomenology of
Spirit', p 78]
THE LOGOS AS THE FAUX LOGICAL GROUNDING OF INFINITY
#4000 MOD 22 = 16 [#AYIN / #70 - as 'eye', 'to see', and by extension,
to understand and obey, it represents the primeval light, that is the
spiritual light of God [Genesis 1:3] as distinct to the celestial lights
[Genesis 1:14-18]] = #0 CE as BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS - MARRIAGE?)
AS FAUX LOGICAL GROUNDING OF INFINITY / *DO* *NOT* *BEAR* *FALSE*
*WITNESS* *BY* PYTHAGOREAN [BABYLONIAN] HETEROS (MALE/FEMALE MARRIAGE --
WHAT IS SIN & WICKEDNESS?) being a binary (ie. gender and spermatic as
bifurcated entities) unnatural autonomic transformative prototype
imposed upon the biological natural order and commences the symbolic
associator series as the MACROCOSM:
#15 CE, #34 CE, #65 CE, #111 CE, #175 CE, #260 CE - I CHING, #369 CE -
DAO TE CHING… #2000 Y2K
#4400 MOD 22 = 11 [#KAF / #20] = #400 CE
#4800 MOD 22 = 6 [#VAV / #6] = #800 CE
#5200 MOD 22 = 1 [#ALEPH / #1] = #1200 CE
#5600 MOD 22 = 18 [#TSADE / #90] = #1600 CE
THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.
"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the
LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus
20:7 (KJV)]
#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 as waters, peoples, nations, languages and
tongues; the spring of Torah being the source of knowledge and wisdom] =
#2000 Y2K / Equinox of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * 364) + 182 days
= Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23)
commencing the Sabbath year of 'oth cycle
THE LOGOS AS THE SUBJECTIVE GROUNDING OF INFINITY IN THE SUBJECT AND AS
MY BESTOWED ETERNITY
The ENNEAD of THOTH as Anthropic Cosmological Principle appears
equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
#6400 MOD 22 = 8 [#CHET / #8]
#6800 MOD 22 = 3 [#GIMEL / #3]
#7200 MOD 22 = 20 [#RESH / #200]
#7600 MOD 22 = 15 [#SAMEK / #60]
#8000 MOD 22 = 10 [#YOD / #10]
#8400 MOD 22 = 5 [#HE / #5]
#8800 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400] as 8800 CE
In many instances, the Torah also uses words and phrases in ways that
cannot be understood in their literal sense. There are a number of very
obvious examples of this in the narrative of the Creation, for the
metaphysical events that took place at that time were far removed from
the natural order of the world we know today. They could not have been
accurately described in ways that we can understand, nor in language
that we can relate to. For example, the Torah tells us how God brought
the world into being through speech, when in fact He created the world
through a form of thought. When the Torah describes God's thought
process as speech, it makes it easier for us to grasp the idea on our
own level. [(c) 2001 by Rabbi Daniel Travis and www.Torah.org]
The Jewish Kabbalah seeks to define the nature of the universe and the
human being, the nature and purpose of existence, and various other
ontological questions. It also presents methods to aid understanding of
the concepts and thereby attain spiritual realisation.
By *POOL* boys do mean: #5) The water warrior: Collegium Communionis
Minirum: College of Actors (ie. CYBER WARFARE AND CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BY
MALEFICENT PROPAGANDIST PERFORMERS AS AGENT PROVOCATEURS OF SLANDER AND
TREASON)?"
DOLF: "The other point I would make is my response to this comment by a
Rabbi: "The sex drive itself gave organized religion an opportunity to
amass what was indisputably the greatest power ever lodged in human
hands." [Rabbi Abraham Feinberg]
That is what I assert by the title: "Loins of Your Mind: Sin as religion
in which 'world-rulers of darkness and powers' engage.
As the argument between which "HETEROS" v's "hom*oIOS" as the Theory of
Number constitutes the mind created in the image of the Divine (Godhead)?"
RICHARD L (SOMIS.ORG) MEASURES: "The long route but we agree."
JEBUS (ATHEIST): "God gives head? I knew he was a fa*ggot all along."
DOLF: "Says who? An inbred Tasmanian!
I would draw your attention, to the earlier observation made in my
positional statement: "Number (HETEROS) Mysticism as the Canonical Basis
for Religious Dogma on Marriage as Opposition to Same Sex Marriage",
that marriage has indeed been between a male and female, which in part
is due to a theological/philosophical reliance on the Pythagorean
HETEROS Theory of Number and this (I'll abbreviate the explanation) then
had an association with Roman Empire governance."
JEBUS (ATHEIST): "Yes indeed and it's clear god sucks dick and is a fa*ggot."
DOLF: "The apparent incongruity and inconsistent attribution with this
paradigm is that according to the Pythagorean HETEROS (ie. Gender and
spermatic) basis of the Theory of Number and the foundation of religious
dogma on the sacredness of male/female marriage actually depicts God as
ONE and having IT attributed by being Hermaphrodite (ie. Being both male
and female).
Thus if God has both sexual organs is IT then hom*osexual, lesbian,
bisexual or heterosexual by nature? I've included lesbianism in that
attribution, lest I am wrongly accused of being misogynistic as the
characteristic of your remark.
And lastly within the elements of the Tetragrammaton comprising all
number we have inclusive, the first THREE NUMBERS as the MYSTICAL
SYMBOLIC CANONICAL BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING THE CONTRARY PYTHAGOREAN
THEORY OF NUMBER as HETEROS which is represented by a formula of
progression that is nothing more than an artifice of words as the
contrived sophist theory of symbolic attributions, and the none existent
grounds for a theory of religion as dogma on marriage.
It constitutes an historical metaphysical and a cosmological basis in
support of the notion of there being substantial esoteric evidence of a
Chinese "empirical perspective". And is a refutation of the contrary
academic and mistaken perennialist view as the idea, that esotericism is
a phenomenon unique to the Western world, without any comparable
category as "Eastern" or "Oriental" esotericism.
Even amongst the esoterics who were not part of the Pythagorean society:
"The principal and most efficacious of their Doctrines they kept ever
amongst themselves, as not to be spoken with exact echemythia (silence)
towards extraneous persons, continuing them unwritten and preserved only
by memory to their successors, to whom they delivered them as mysteries
of the gods; by which means, nothing of any moment came abroad from
them. What had been taught and learnt a long time, was only known
within the walls; and if at any time were any extraneous, and as I may
say, profane persons amongst them, the Men (so commonly were the
Pythagoreans termed) signified their meaning to one another by symbols."
[Pythagoras, The History of Philosophy 1687 edition, p 521]
THE PYTHAGOREAN (HETEROS) THEORY OF NUMBER (HETEROS) MYSTICISM AS THE
SYMBOLIC CANONICAL BASIS FOR JEWISH, CHRISTIAN AND ISLAMIC DOGMA ON
HETEROSEXUAL MARRIAGE AND CONVEYS THE FOLLOWING AS ITS TETRAD AS CANON
OF TRANSPOSITION:
ONE (MONAD): This number represents the beginning of all things. In
effect, all number are manifestations of one. Some ancients even argued
against counting one as number, as it is the source of numbers. It is
the initial impulse and the sum of all things. It is the unity of the
Godhead made manifest and the symbol of wisdom.
- Mind: because the Mind is stable, and every way alike, and has
preeminence;
- Hermaphrodite: It is both Male and Female, Odd and Even, it partakes
of both natures, being added to the even, it makes odd, to the odd, even;
- God: because it is the beginning and end of all, it self having
neither beginning nor end;
- Good: for such is the Nature of one;
- Chaos: confusion, contemplation, obscurity;
- Matter: receptacle of all, because it produces Duad, which is properly
matter;
- Tower of Jupiter: Custody of Jupiter, Throne of Jupiter from the great
power which the Centre hath in the Universe, being able to restrain the
general Circular Motion, as if the Custody of the Maker of all things
were constituted therein;
- In Greater and Lesser: Equal, in intention and remission, middle; in
multitude, mean, in time, now, the present because it consists in one
part of time which is always present;
- Seminal Reason: because this one only is one to the retractors, and is
alone, and the rest are procreated of it, and it is the only seminary of
all Numbers. Author of Life;
- Geniture: because without it no number has being;
- Substance: because substance is primary;
- Cause of Truth: Simple Exemplar, Constitution of Symphony;
- Form or Species: because it circ*mscribes. comprehends, and
terminates, and because it produces the rest of the effects;
- Jupiter: because he is the Father and Head of the Gods whence the
Pythagorean verse: "Hear noble Number, Sire of gods and men."
- Mnemosyne: the personification of memory;
- Vesta or Fire: For the nature of Monad, like Vesta, is seated in the
midst of the World, and keeps that Seat, inclining to no side;
TWO (DUAD): The number two represents polarity and duality. By the
power of the Duad the deep was created as a mirror to the heaven above.
It symbolized ignorance, but the Pythagoreans also called it the mother
of wisdom.
- Genius: evil, darkness, sinister, unequal, unstable, moveable;
- Matter: because indefinite; indeterminate Duad, proceeds from Monad as
Matter. The cause of tumor and division;
- Cause of dissimilars;
- Marriage: Juno being both wife and sister to Jupiter;
- Soul: from motion hither and thither;
- Fountain of Distribution:
- Diana: because the Moon takes many settings from all the fixed stars,
and because she is forked, and called half-moon;
- Ignorance:
- Opinion:
- Motion, Generation, Mutation, Division: First longitude, augmentation,
composition, communion, misfortune, sustentation because it first
suffered separation;
- Science: for all demonstration, and credit of science, and all
syllogism collects from some things granted, the things in question, and
easily demonstrates another; the comprehension of which things is science;
THREE (MARRIAGE): It is the FIRST EQUILIBRIUM OF UNITIES. It represents
peace, prudence, temperance, friendship and it is the cause of wisdom
and understanding. The ancients considered the triad sacred, because it
contains the MONAD and DUAD in perfect balance and harmony.
- Coacervation (ie. Latin cum '(together) with' + acervus 'heap') of
Unities:
- Saturnia:
- Marriage: friendship, peace, concord, because it collects and unites,
not similiars, but contraries;
- Justice:
- Prudence, Wisdom: because men order the present, foresee the future,
and learn experience by the past;
- Piety, Temperance: All virtues depend upon this number, and proceed
from it;
- Mind: It is the cause of Wisdom and Understanding. It is Knowledge
which is most proper to Number;
The combined source of this Monad, Duad, Tetrad information was the
Occult Encyclopedia of Magic Squares (Planetary Angels & Spirits of
Ceremonial Magic) (c) 2009 by Nineveh Shadrach; with additional
attributions obtained from the photographic facsimile of the 9th edition
as the 1687 edition of the History of Philosophy [Freemason Stanley
Hall, (c) 1970, Philosophical Research Society]
Of this TETRAD Pythagoras writes that it is the "Root and Principle: for
it is, as we said, the maker and cause of all things; intelligible God,
Author of Celestial and sensible Good. The knowledge of these things
was delivered to Pythagoras by Pythagoras himself.
For this Reason the Word TETRACTYS (#10) was used by Pythagoras, and his
Disciples, as a great Oath, who likewise, out of respect to their
Master, forbearing his Name, did swear by the person that communicated
the TETRACTYS to them:
Eternal Nature's Fountain I attest,
Who the TETRACTYS to our Soul express'
It was called KEY-KEEPER OF NATURE, because the universal cannot be
without it; to these Sciences it confers constitution and settlement,
and reconciles them: yea, it is NATURE itself and TRUTH.
Even amongst the esoterics who were not part of the Pythagorean society:
"The principal and most efficacious of their Doctrines they kept ever
amongst themselves, as not to be spoken with exact echemythia (silence)
towards extraneous persons, continuing them unwritten and preserved only
by memory to their successors, to whom they delivered them as mysteries
of the gods; by which means, nothing of any moment came abroad from
them. What had been taught and learnt a long time, was only known
within the walls; and if at any time were any extraneous, and as I may
say, profane persons amongst them, the Men (so commonly were the
Pythagoreans termed) signified their meaning to one another by symbols."
[Pythagoras, The History of Philosophy 1687 edition, p 521]
Encapsulated knowledge is therefore distinguishable from codified
knowledge primarily along the dimension of observability which has
implications for the appropriability of value. The observability of
explicit, codified knowledge makes it susceptible to misappropriation.
[Wikipedia 2016: Encapsulated_knowledge]
JEBUS (ATHEIST): "So you basically still agree with me? That's a lot of
words just to say you agree with me dolphin."
DOLF: "So boy suck on that wad...
I just wanted you to get the full satisfaction of a mind ***@ck from God."
JEBUS (ATHEIST): "It was truly devastating."
DOLF: "Can you imagine how damaged, wrecked and wretched those
religionists who derived their sacred marriage dogma from the
Pythagorean HETEROS based Theory of Number are going to feel?"
JEBUS (ATHEIST): "Yes, really devastated I would imagine."
DOLF: "This is a moment in history and the warfare of same sex marriage.
Don't gag now. Lol"
JEBUS (ATHEIST): "Yes LOL (I'll try to figure out what I'm LOLing about
later)."
DUKE (CATHOLIC) EARL WEBER: "It's good that God allows you to condemn
yourself thru your own actions."
RICHARD L (SOMIS.ORG) MEASURES: "Chortle."
DUKE (CATHOLIC) EARL WEBER: "Laughing at nutcase dolf is understandable."
RICHARD L (SOMIS.ORG) MEASURES: "I was not laughing at Dolf."
DUKE (CATHOLIC) EARL WEBER: "Yep, which is why I can't believe so many
people reject the concept."
DOLF: "I did not even receive hate mail or an increase in any spam as a
result of posting that quasi-comprehensible statement as a claimed truth."
PATRICK (CATHOLIC) BARKER: "Does this make you proud? That you never
received any hate mail? Did you expect to receive hate mail? Is this
something that you desire?"
DOLF: "I have previously and repeatedly posted my substantiation, but
the inability to read and comprehend them is entirely your
difficulty--as it is written:
"Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom
teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things
with spiritual." [1 Corinthians 2:13 (KJV)]
"But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, [even] those
who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good
and evil." [Hebrews 5:14 (KJV)]
You have exhibited no intellectual or reasoning capacity of your own as
befits a human being who is capable of deploying the higher faculties of
mind.
Such that, you are a human being with a religious belief as a 'co*ck and
bull' story, yet who is absent of a soul as a spirit-filled being,
having no prospect of eternity and whose temporal existence is entirely
driven by an animal nature.
We ought not to be amazed that such a being is speech endowed and can
makeup clever things to say, but as always it is unreasoned, unfounded
and the dishonest means to preserve their own ego as self-identity."
This experience of knowing, instead becomes so unreasonably possessed of
a delusional (ie. an idiosyncratic belief or impression maintained
despite being contradicted by reality or rational argument, typically as
a symptom of mental disorder) state of mind as to be capably diagnosed
of having "a reprobate mind", as a dishonorable (ie. bringing shame or
disgrace on someone or something) human condition, which is implacable
(ie. unable to be stopped; relentless) and without any natural
affection, as an unmerciful (ie. cruel or harsh; showing no mercy)
presence of being. [Romans 1:11-32]
The Apostle's Epistle to the Romans unambiguously concerns an
everlasting wisdom of divine origin, "a Primordial Tradition" as an
argument which is made against the notion of the Godhead sustained by a
sophistic artifice as the HETEROS basis of Number which is an invention
of the Transformative Prototype necessary to overcome inherent dichotomy
within the unity of 1x1 as a diagonal of the square root of 2 which
exhibits as incommensurate characteristic.
Thus the language which the Apostle Paul deploys within the first
Chapter of the Epistle to the Romans, is a precise discussion about
Nature exhibiting the natural order of male/female as a biological
construct and attribution. And against which, is the imposed as a
prerogative claim of Wisdom, an imposition made against its unity: 1x1
by the use of a Transformative Prototype as sacred cross and a sophistic
artifice known as HETEROS that is called the THEORY OF NUMBER.
The Apostle's judgement of it being a state of ignorance which acts
against Nature. As a perspective entirely substantiated by the 4 BCE
publication of the "Canon of Supreme Mysteries" being an alternative as
THEORY OF NUMBER as a treatise made of Nature, establishing a
mathematical basis to each Tetragrammaton comprising each element as a
hom*oIOS conception of Number:
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ *1* - *MONAD*, *2* - *DUAD*, *3* - *TRIAD* {ie. Formula of Progression
of individual phenomena}
= Tetragrammaton hierarchy value as hom*oIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. Organization of the myriad or *number* of
things (Wan Wu) of society and nature}
HOWEVER THIS SACRED TETRAD (#4) has a dependancy upon an alternative and
more equitable as a mathematical basis to it's tetragrammaton schema
hierarchy which comprises the ternary hom*oIOS THEORY OF NUMBER is
already constituted by a TETRAD as it's intrinsic property within each
NUMBER that is formed. So redundantly Pythagoras uses this internal
schema as the mechanics for a METATHESIS AS CANON OF TRANSPOSITION as
the means to effect a substantiation of his binary HETEROS THEORY OF
NUMBER as a substituted TETRAD. And by doing so, it introduces a
counterfactual fallacy, or speculative fallacy and is therefore a
hypothesis contrary to fact made by the demiurge in having no natural
and common law impetus for such ecclesiastical practice as their claimed
piety and hence the 4th magic square as 6x6 = #111 as associated to the
deity Sol Invictus but is considered an anathema because it sums to #666:
"Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the
beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred
threescore and six." [Revelation 13:18 (KJV)].
As offering a poorly supported claim about what might have happened in
the past or future, if (the hypothetical part) circ*mstances or
conditions were different. The fallacy also entails treating future
hypothetical situations as if they are fact.
ACCORDINGLY, I HAVE SHOWN IT (ie. #15CE ... #34CE ... #65CE ... #111CE
... as a Holy Catholic Tradition with #2000 CE proclaimed as Jubilee to
be fraudulent as blasphemy) TO BE A PERVERSE *SECRET* KNOWLEDGE,
FAUX-PIETY AND A FRAUDULENT CLAIM TO RIGHTEOUSNESS:
I did this by conveying specific Scripture (historical and gospel)
readings which were associated to computed 'Categories of
*Understanding*' (ie. SUPER (MALE) IDEA and EGO (FEMALE) IDEA) and
obtained by means of my intellectual property (as a natural endowment)
associated to the GRAPPLE hom*oIOTIC NOUMENON as a theoretical and
metaphysical concept of the Godhead/Divine Nature as Mind, conscious
reality of hom*o[iOS] SAPIEN[TAL] and the COURSE-trouchos OF
NATURE-genesis [Jame 3:6].
By showing a natural comparison between the chronological placement of
the series:
#15 ... #34 ... #65 of the progression of Magic Squares associated with
the traditional Pythagorean mystical HETEROS basis to the THEORY OF
NUMBER as a binary apparatus (ie. gender and spermatic as bifurcated
entities) and the institutional basis for sacred marriage emulating
heaven-earth in union by heiro-gamos, attributed time as the Celestial
Hierarchy which is common to Judaism, Roman Catholicism et al Christian
communities, Freemasons, Islamic religious belief and Roman Empire
governance."
WELCOME TO BABYLON, WHERE PYTHAGORAS HAS TAKEN YOU ALL, AND IT IS NOW
TIME TO DEPART FROM HER, SO THAT YOU MAY NOT SHARE IN HER RECOMPENSE
WHICH HAS BEEN LONG DUE.
*THUS* *HAVING* *LOST* *THEIR* *SOUL* *THEY* *CANNOT* *NOW* *EXIST*.
*CRUSADING* *MATTADORI*
"*JINGO* *BELLS*,
*JINGO* *BELLS*,
*JINGO* *ALL* *THE* *WAY*,
*OH* *WHAT* *FUN* *IT* *IS* *TO* *RIDE*.
*ON* *A* *ONE* *TERSE*--*OPEN* *SLAY*!"
[PAUSING FOR RSL PARADE, AVON STREET, BRIAGOLONG REMEMBRANCE DAY 11
NOVEMBER 2006]
SEE ALSO: "CRUSADING MATTADORI" dated 30 March 2017
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indYzNfZnIwQVdpeFk
In my view, Andrew Bolt has been improperly convicted by the hysteria of
others as being without any substance of reality when the historical
facts support his claim.
That the conviction ought to be overturned, he is financially
compensated and finally I would draw on this Islamic custom:
Take off your sandals for this is indeed Holy Land.
Bare your arse to the sun and prostrate yourselves in submission to our
transcendent will in proffering your sincere apology as you beg for our
forgiveness.
IT IS AFTER ALL OUR NEW HOLLAND AND YOU JUSTIFY YOUR CANOED MAROONED AS
SHIP-WRECKED EXISTENCE HERE AS "WHITE SKINNED ABORIGINALS"?
SEE ALSO: "THE ANATHEMA (INDIGENOUS DUTCH AUSTRALIAN / GENOCIDAL
AFRIKANERS) OF WHAT IS A TRUE AUSTRALIAN IDENTITY"
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indQnpHSTB1cVVESmc
A REVISION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED AS A PDF DOCUMENT FROM THIS URL:
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indekJ3TmVuRWx6WGc
- dolf
